Literature DB >> 15899072

Patient and physician attitudes toward breast cancer clinical trials: developing interventions based on understanding barriers.

Michelle E Melisko1, Fern Hassin, Lauren Metzroth, Dan H Moore, Beth Brown, Kiran Patel, Hope S Rugo, Debu Tripathy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical trials are essential to develop and test novel therapies, yet only 2%-3% of women with breast cancer enroll. We sought to describe patient and physician barriers to trial participation and then implemented targeted interventions to increase awareness and interest in trial participation. Also, with increasing patient interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for cancer, we explored attitudes regarding CAM clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1997 and 2000, questionnaires were offered to patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent breast cancer and to physicians specializing in breast cancer. Programs aimed at patients and physicians from our geographic region to increase their support for breast cancer clinical trials were initiated in 1997. Correlation between perceived barriers and patient and physician demographics were explored. Reluctance to be randomized, extra time, and concerns about worse side effects with the experimental arm were the most significant patient barriers. Physician barriers included randomization, extra staff time, and increased costs of enrollment. Patients and physicians approved of studying CAM in clinical trials, with different scores based on age and type of practice. Physicians and patients developed more favorable views of clinical trials between 1997 and 2000.
RESULTS: Although many barriers still exist, this study suggests that attitudes toward clinical trials are evolving and significantly affected by patient age and stage of disease. Because different patients and some different physicians were surveyed, it is difficult to conclude that the changes occurred as a result of the interventions.
CONCLUSION: Future efforts to improve enrollment should focus on patients' individual concerns and the uneasiness with the randomization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15899072     DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2005.n.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  22 in total

1.  A prospective analysis of the influence of older age on physician and patient decision-making when considering enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials (SWOG S0316).

Authors:  Sara H Javid; Joseph M Unger; Julie R Gralow; Carol M Moinpour; Antoinette J Wozniak; J Wendall Goodwin; Primo N Lara; Pamela A Williams; Laura F Hutchins; Carolyn C Gotay; Kathy S Albain
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-06-20

2.  Research subject enrollment by primary care pediatricians using an electronic health record.

Authors:  Robert W Grundmeier; Marguerite Swietlik; Louis M Bell
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

3.  Incentives and barriers to neurological clinical research participation.

Authors:  Anne S Lindblad; Pam Zingeser; Nil Sismanyazici-Navaie
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2011-12

4.  The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Elise Cook; Eric Tai; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

5.  Assessment of perceived cost to the patient and other barriers to clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Douglas J Weckstein; Christian A Thomas; Ivette F Emery; Barbara F Shea; Alison Fleury; Margaret E White; Elizabeth Chase; Cindy Robinson; Stacey Frazier; Christine Pilar
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 6.  Recommendations for enhancing clinical trials education: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Karen A Stepan; Amy P Gonzalez; Vivian S Dorsey; Debra K Frye; Nita D Pyle; Regina F Smith; Terry A Throckmorton; Louise A Villejo; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Application of best practice approaches for designing decision support tools: the preparatory education about clinical trials (PRE-ACT) study.

Authors:  Linda Fleisher; Dominique G Ruggieri; Suzanne M Miller; Sharon Manne; Terrance Albrecht; Joanne Buzaglo; Michael A Collins; Michael Katz; Tyler G Kinzy; Tasnuva Liu; Cheri Manning; Ellen Specker Charap; Jennifer Millard; Dawn M Miller; David Poole; Stephanie Raivitch; Nancy Roach; Eric A Ross; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-04-21

8.  Enrollment onto breast cancer therapeutic clinical trials: a tertiary cancer center experience.

Authors:  Suzanne Swain-Cabriales; Laura Bourdeanu; Joyce Niland; Tracy Stiller; George Somlo
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.257

9.  Attitudinal barriers to participation in oncology clinical trials: factor analysis and correlates of barriers.

Authors:  S Manne; D Kashy; T Albrecht; Y-N Wong; A Lederman Flamm; A B Benson; S M Miller; Linda Fleisher; J Buzaglo; N Roach; M Katz; E Ross; M Collins; D Poole; S Raivitch; D M Miller; T G Kinzy; T Liu; N J Meropol
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.520

10.  The relationships among knowledge, self-efficacy, preparedness, decisional conflict, and decisions to participate in a cancer clinical trial.

Authors:  S M Miller; S V Hudson; B L Egleston; S Manne; J S Buzaglo; K Devarajan; L Fleisher; J Millard; N Solarino; J Trinastic; N J Meropol
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.