Literature DB >> 11956272

How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials.

Warren B Sateren1, Edward L Trimble, Jeffrey Abrams, Otis Brawley, Nancy Breen, Leslie Ford, Mary McCabe, Richard Kaplan, Malcolm Smith, Richard Ungerleider, Michaele C Christian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We chose to examine the impact of socioeconomic factors on accrual to National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored cancer treatment trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We estimated the geographic and demographic cancer burden in the United States and then identified 24,332 patients accrued to NCI-sponsored cancer treatment trials during a 12-month period. Next, we examined accrual by age, sex, geographic residence, health insurance status, health maintenance organization market penetration, several proxy measures of socioeconomic status, the availability of an oncologist, and the presence of a hospital with an approved multidisciplinary cancer program.
RESULTS: Pediatric patients were accrued to clinical trials at high levels, whereas after adolescence, only a small percentage of cancer patients were enrolled onto clinical trials. There were few differences by sex. Black males as well as Asian-American and Hispanic adults were accrued to clinical trials at lower rates than white cancer patients of the same age. Overall, the highest observed accrual was in suburban counties. Compared with the United States population, patients enrolled onto clinical trials were significantly less likely to be uninsured and more like to have Medicare health insurance. Geographic areas with higher socioeconomic levels had higher levels of clinical trial accruals. The number of oncologists and the presence of approved cancer programs both were significantly associated with increased accrual to clinical trials.
CONCLUSION: We must work to increase the number of adults who enroll onto trials, especially among the elderly. Ongoing partnership with professional societies may be an effective approach to strengthen accrual to clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11956272     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  195 in total

1.  Quality of life during the course of cancer treatment in older newly diagnosed patients. Results of a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  M T E Puts; J Monette; V Girre; C Wolfson; M Monette; G Batist; H Bergman
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Socioeconomic and clinical factors are key to uncovering disparity in accrual onto therapeutic trials for breast cancer.

Authors:  Carolyn E Behrendt; Arti Hurria; Lusine Tumyan; Joyce C Niland; Joanne E Mortimer
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  "The promise of community-based advocacy and education efforts for increasing cancer clinical trials accrual".

Authors:  Margo Michaels; Elisa S Weiss; John A Guidry; Natasha Blakeney; Liz Swords; Brian Gibbs; Samantha Yeun; Bruce Rytkonen; Robert Goodman; S Lisbeth Jarama; Amanda L Greene; Shilpa Patel
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Clinical trial participation and time to treatment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: does age at diagnosis or insurance make a difference?

Authors:  Helen M Parsons; Linda C Harlan; Nita L Seibel; Jennifer L Stevens; Theresa H M Keegan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Evidence based medicine and justice: a framework for looking at the impact of EBM upon vulnerable or disadvantaged groups.

Authors:  W A Rogers
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Potential pitfalls of crossover and thoughts on iniparib in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Tito Fojo; Laleh Amiri-Kordestani; Susan E Bates
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Can claims-based data be used to recruit black and Hispanic subjects into clinical trials?

Authors:  Ana M Palacio; Leonardo J Tamariz; Claudia Uribe; Hua Li; Ellen J Salkeld; Leslie Hazel-Fernandez; Olveen Carrasquillo
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  A STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING HEALTH AND REDUCING HEALTH DISPARITIES.

Authors:  Claudia R Baquet; Shiraz I Mishra; Patricia Commiskey; Niharika Khanna
Journal:  Md Fam Dr       Date:  2006

9.  Barriers to therapeutic clinical trials enrollment: differences between African-American and white cancer patients identified at the time of eligibility assessment.

Authors:  Lynne Penberthy; Richard Brown; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Bassam Dahman; Gordon Ginder; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 10.  Developing Real-world Evidence-Ready Datasets: Time for Clinician Engagement.

Authors:  James M Snyder; Jacob A Pawloski; Laila M Poisson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.