Literature DB >> 11189096

Physician perspectives on increasing minorities in cancer clinical trials: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Initiative.

H A Pinto1, W McCaskill-Stevens, P Wolfe, A C Marcus.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper describes the ECOG-NMA Minority Accrual Initiative to assure minority participation in cancer clinical trials.
METHODS: Focus groups were held to identify physician-reported barriers to the enrollment of minority patients in Cleveland, OH, Indianapolis, IN, Santa Clara County, CA, and Philadelphia, PA. Community physicians affiliated with the National Medical Association (NMA), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) investigators participated in the focus groups. A four-step process consisting of focus group workshops were conducted to (i) identify barriers, (ii) develop potential solutions to the barriers, (iii) define solutions to barriers involving specific clinical trials, and (iv) implement the solutions.
RESULTS: Focus group participants identified physician lack of information, patient fears and suspicion, the fear of losing patients, and distrust of the health care system as the major barriers to enrollment of African Americans. We found significant differences between community physicians and cancer program physicians in several areas. Community physicians emphasized personal contacts to address the lack of information and to overcome patient fears and suspicions, while the cancer program physicians emphasized printed materials. There was no difference by region in the barriers identified in the focus group workshops; however, the proposed solutions to overcoming the barriers were specific to each site.
CONCLUSION: The four-step process developed by the ECOG and the NMA used the focus group methodology to identify and overcome barriers to participation of African Americans in cancer clinical trials. Outreach efforts to educate patients, their families, and community physicians about cancer clinical trials should be directed at overcoming patient suspicions and providing practical information to physicians about specific trials and how to enroll patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11189096     DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00191-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  24 in total

1.  Barriers to recruitment of rural patients in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Shamsuddin Virani; Lola Burke; Scot C Remick; Jame Abraham
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Attitudes of urban American Indians and Alaska Natives regarding participation in research.

Authors:  Dedra Buchwald; Veronica Mendoza-Jenkins; Calvin Croy; Helen McGough; Marjorie Bezdek; Paul Spicer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Recruiting vulnerable populations into research: a systematic review of recruitment interventions.

Authors:  Stacy J UyBico; Shani Pavel; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment in Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Lauren M Hamel; Louis A Penner; Terrance L Albrecht; Elisabeth Heath; Clement K Gwede; Susan Eggly
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.302

5.  Engaging African Americans in Research: The Recruiter's Perspective.

Authors:  Nadine J Barrett; Kearston L Ingraham; Tracey Vann Hawkins; Patricia G Moorman
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.847

6.  Participation of Asian-American women in cancer treatment research: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tung T Nguyen; Carol P Somkin; Yifei Ma; Lei-Chun Fung; Thoa Nguyen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2005

Review 7.  Recruiting underserved populations to dermatologic research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chaya R Spears; Bridgit V Nolan; Jenna L O'Neill; Thomas A Arcury; Joseph G Grzywacz; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.736

8.  A population-based assessment of specialty physician involvement in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Nancy L Keating; Arnold L Potosky; Anita Ambs; Yulei He; Mark C Hornbrook; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Application of best practice approaches for designing decision support tools: the preparatory education about clinical trials (PRE-ACT) study.

Authors:  Linda Fleisher; Dominique G Ruggieri; Suzanne M Miller; Sharon Manne; Terrance Albrecht; Joanne Buzaglo; Michael A Collins; Michael Katz; Tyler G Kinzy; Tasnuva Liu; Cheri Manning; Ellen Specker Charap; Jennifer Millard; Dawn M Miller; David Poole; Stephanie Raivitch; Nancy Roach; Eric A Ross; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-04-21

10.  Clinical trials attitudes and practices of Latino physicians.

Authors:  Amelie G Ramirez; Kimberly Wildes; Greg Talavera; Anna Nápoles-Springer; Kipling Gallion; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.