| Literature DB >> 34073820 |
Jian Zhang1,2, Ai Zhao1.
Abstract
Population aging is a global phenomenon. The present study determined the effects of dietary diversity score (DDS) and food consumption on healthy aging. A subset of the data of the China Health and Nutrition Survey was utilized in this study. DDSs were calculated using the dietary data collected in the years 2009 and 2011. A healthy aging score (HAS) was calculated by summing the standardized scores on physical functional limitation, comorbidity, cognitive function, and psychological stress based on the data collected in the year 2015, with a lower HAS indicating a healthier aging process. Life quality was self-reported in the year 2015. This study found that DDS was inversely associated with HAS (T3 vs. T1: β -0.16, 95%CI -0.20 to -0.11, p-trend <0.001). The consumption of meat and poultry, aquatic products, and fruits was inversely associated with HAS, and participants in the highest tertile of staple foods consumption had a higher HAS than those in the lowest tertile. HAS was inversely associated with good self-reported life quality and positively associated with bad life quality. In conclusion, food consumption may influence the aging process, and adherence to a diverse diet is associated with a healthier aging process in elderly people.Entities:
Keywords: cognition; comorbidity; dietary diversity; healthy aging; physical functional limitation; psychological stress
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34073820 PMCID: PMC8225052 DOI: 10.3390/nu13061787
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flow chart of sample selection.
Baseline characteristics of the participants across dietary diversity score tertiles.
| Variables | Dietary Diversity Score a |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | ||
| Number of participants | 991 | 1076 | 1018 | |
| Age (year) | 62.1(5.6) | 61.6(5.5) | 61.9(5.6) | 0.088 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.3(3.8) | 23.9(3.4) | 24.4(3.2) | <0.001 |
| Gender | 0.166 | |||
| Men | 44.1 | 48.2 | 46.7 | |
| Women | 55.9 | 51.8 | 53.3 | |
| Region of residence | <0.001 | |||
| Southern China | 60.9 | 69.1 | 63.0 | |
| Northern China | 39.1 | 30.9 | 37.0 | |
| Residency | <0.001 | |||
| Rural | 84.2 | 65.1 | 36.1 | |
| Urban | 15.8 | 34.9 | 63.9 | |
| Education | <0.001 | |||
| Primary school and below | 80.7 | 61.9 | 35.1 | |
| Middle school and above | 19.3 | 38.1 | 64.9 | |
| Per capita household income | <0.001 | |||
| Low | 54.0 | 32.4 | 11.8 | |
| Middle | 31.1 | 37.7 | 25.3 | |
| High | 14.9 | 29.9 | 62.9 | |
| Marriage status | <0.001 | |||
| Married | 83.9 | 88.4 | 90.2 | |
| Others | 16.1 | 11.6 | 9.8 | |
| Smoking | 0.001 | |||
| Current smoker | 30.1 | 28.0 | 23.1 | |
| Non-smoker | 69.9 | 72.0 | 76.9 | |
| Alcohol use (times/week) | 0.474 | |||
| <1 | 79.8 | 78.0 | 77.8 | |
| ≥1 | 20.2 | 22.0 | 22.2 | |
a Dietary diversity scores were grouped into tertiles from low to high (T1: 1.7–3.3, T2: 3.5–4.3, and T3: 4.4–8.0). Continuous variables are presented as means and standard deviations; categorical variables are presented as percentages. Continuous variables were compared across dietary diversity score tertiles by ANOVA; categorical variables were compared by Chi-square tests.
Association of dietary diversity score with healthy aging.
| Variables | Dietary Diversity Score a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | ||
| Healthy aging score b | ||||
| Crude | Ref | −0.12(−0.16, −0.08) | −0.26(−0.31, −0.22) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | Ref | −0.06(−0.10, −0.02) | −0.15(−0.20, −0.11) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | Ref | −0.06(−0.10, −0.02) | −0.16(−0.20, −0.11) | <0.001 |
| Physical functional limitation c | ||||
| Crude | Ref | 0.77(0.65, 0.90) | 0.58(0.49, 0.68) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | Ref | 0.87(0.73, 1.04) | 0.64(0.52, 0.79) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 0.86(0.73, 1.03) | 0.64(0.52, 0.78) | <0.001 |
| Comorbidity c | ||||
| Crude | Ref | 1.07(0.90, 1.27) | 1.26(1.06, 1.50) | 0.010 |
| Model 1 | Ref | 1.09(0.91, 1.31) | 1.19(0.97, 1.47) | 0.101 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 1.01(0.84, 1.22) | 1.09(0.88, 1.35) | 0.441 |
| Cognitive function c | ||||
| Crude | Ref | 1.58(1.34, 1.85) | 2.88(2.44, 3.39) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | Ref | 1.25(1.05, 1.48) | 1.80(1.48, 2.19) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 1.23(1.04, 1.46) | 1.77(1.46, 2.15) | <0.001 |
| Psychological stress c | ||||
| Crude | Ref | 0.56(0.48, 0.66) | 0.42(0.36, 0.50) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | Ref | 0.63(0.53, 0.74) | 0.59(0.48, 0.71) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 0.63(0.53, 0.75) | 0.59(0.49, 0.72) | <0.001 |
Ref, reference. a Dietary diversity scores were grouped into tertiles from low to high (T1: 1.7–3.3, T2: 3.5–4.3, and T3: 4.4–8.0). b Linear regression models were created to estimate the association of dietary diversity score with healthy aging score; values are β (95% confidence intervals) unless specified. c Ordinal logistic regression models were created to estimate the association of dietary diversity score with physical functional limitation, comorbidity, cognitive function, and psychological stress; values are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) unless specified. Comorbidity and physical functional limitations were classified into categorical variables according to the number of comorbidities or functional limitations (0, 1–2, or ≥3). Scores for cognitive function and psychological stress are grouped into tertiles from low to high. Multivariate models were adjusted for: model 1: age, gender, region of residence, residency, education, income, and marriage status; model 2: additionally included body mass index, smoking, and alcohol use.
Figure 2Subgroup analysis of the association between dietary diversity score tertiles and healthy aging. Dietary diversity scores were grouped into tertiles from low to high (T1: 1.7–3.3, T2: 3.5–4.3, and T3: 4.4–8.0). Squares and horizontal lines showed the results of T3 vs. T1. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Association of DDS tertiles with healthy aging score (lower score indicated healthier aging) was estimated by a linear regression model. Association of DDS tertiles with physical functional limitation, comorbidity, cognitive function, and psychological stress was estimated by an ordinal logistic regression model. Comorbidity and physical functional limitations were classified into categorical variables according to the number of comorbidities or functional limitations (0, 1–2, or ≥3). Cognition and PSS were grouped into tertiles from low to high. Multivariate models were adjusted for age, gender, region of residence, residency, education, income, marriage status, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol use. Analyses within subgroups were adjusted for all other covariates.
Association between food consumption and healthy aging score.
| Food Groups | Number of Participants | Median (IQR) | Crude | Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95%CI) | β (95%CI) | |||||
| Staple foods | <0.001 | 0.060 | ||||
| Low | 1028 | 130.8 (33.2) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Middle | 1028 | 178.2 (20.5) | 0.05 (0.01, 0.10) | 0 (−0.04, 0.04) | ||
| High | 1029 | 228.2 (41.5) | 0.12 (0.08, 0.16) | 0.04 (0, 0.08) | ||
| Soybeans and nuts | 0.180 | 0.995 | ||||
| Low | 1028 | 0 (2.2) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Middle | 1028 | 8.4 (4.1) | −0.05 (−0.09, −0.01) | −0.03 (−0.07, 0.01) | ||
| High | 1029 | 21.2 (13.5) | −0.03 (−0.08, 0.01) | 0 (−0.04, 0.04) | ||
| Vegetables | 0.585 | 0.167 | ||||
| Low | 1028 | 95.8 (33.5) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Middle | 1028 | 149.6 (26.2) | 0 (−0.05, 0.04) | −0.01 (−0.05, 0.02) | ||
| High | 1029 | 225.0 (70.2) | −0.01 (−0.06, 0.03) | −0.03 (−0.07, 0.01) | ||
| Fruits | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Non-consumer | 1482 | 0 | Ref | Ref | ||
| Low | 802 | 31.2 (20.2) | −0.10 (−0.14, −0.06) | −0.05 (−0.09, −0.01) | ||
| High | 801 | 88.1 (54.0) | −0.13 (−0.18, −0.09) | −0.09 (−0.13, −0.05) | ||
| Meat and poultry | <0.001 | 0.047 | ||||
| Low | 1028 | 16.1 (24.0) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Middle | 1028 | 42.7 (12.2) | −0.08 (−0.13, −0.04) | −0.04 (−0.08, 0) | ||
| High | 1029 | 76.9 (30.6) | −0.13 (−0.17, −0.08) | −0.04 (−0.09, 0) | ||
| Aquatic products | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Non-consumer | 1436 | 0 | Ref | Ref | ||
| Low | 824 | 13.8 (8.9) | −0.12 (−0.16, −0.07) | −0.05 (−0.09, −0.01) | ||
| High | 825 | 38.0 (21.7) | −0.17 (−0.21, −0.13) | −0.10 (−0.14, −0.06) | ||
| Eggs | 0.006 | 0.113 | ||||
| Low | 1028 | 0(5.1) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Middle | 1028 | 14.6 (5.7) | −0.02 (−0.06, 0.02) | 0.01 (−0.03, 0.05) | ||
| High | 1029 | 30.7 (15.3) | −0.06 (−0.10, −0.02) | −0.03 (−0.07, 0.01) | ||
| Milk and dairy products | <0.001 | 0.054 | ||||
| Non-consumer | 2493 | 0 | Ref | Ref | ||
| Low | 296 | 45.9 (30.3) | −0.13 (−0.19, −0.06) | −0.08 (−0.14, −0.02) | ||
| High | 296 | 126.2 (65.4) | −0.13 (−0.19, −0.07) | −0.05 (−0.11, 0.01) | ||
IQR, interquartile range; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference. Consumption of fruits, aquatic products, and milk and dairy products were grouped into non-consumer, low (below the median in consumers), and high (above the median in consumers). Other food groups were grouped into tertiles and labeled as low, middle, and high. Linear regression models were created to estimate the association of food consumption with healthy aging score (a lower score indicates healthier aging). Multivariate models were adjusted for age, gender, region of residence, residency, education, income, marriage status, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol use.
Healthy aging score and self-reported life quality a.
| Self-Reported | Number of | Crude | Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) |
| ||
| Fair | 1148 | Ref | Ref | ||
| Good | 1763 | 0.38 (0.32, 0.44) | <0.001 | 0.38 (0.32, 0.45) | <0.001 |
| Poor | 168 | 4.15 (3.05, 5.66) | <0.001 | 4.41 (3.12, 6.25) | <0.001 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference. a 3079 participants were included in analysis. Multinomial logistic regression models were created to estimate the association of healthy aging score (a lower score indicates healthier aging) with self-reported life quality. Multivariate models were adjusted for age, gender, region of residence, residency, education, income, and marriage status.