| Literature DB >> 30923556 |
Maryam Abshirini1,2, Fereydoun Siassi1, Fariba Koohdani3, Mostafa Qorbani4,5, Hadis Mozaffari1,2, Zahra Aslani1,2, Mahshid Soleymani1, Mahdieh Entezarian1, Gity Sotoudeh1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal women are at higher risk of mental disorders. Oxidative stress has implication in the development of these disorders. Dietary total antioxidant capacity (DTAC) has been proposed as a tool for assessing dietary antioxidants intake. The relationship between DTAC with depression, anxiety and stress has not been investigated in postmenopausal women. Thus, we aimed to assess the association between DTAC and depression, stress and anxiety as well as oxidative stress biomarkers.Entities:
Keywords: Depression; Menopause; Oxidative stress; Total antioxidant capacity
Year: 2019 PMID: 30923556 PMCID: PMC6423824 DOI: 10.1186/s12991-019-0225-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Gen Psychiatry ISSN: 1744-859X Impact factor: 3.455
Demographic, anthropometric, dietary and psychological characteristics of study participant across the tertiles of energy-adjusted DTAC (n = 175)
| Characteristics | Tertiles of energy-adjusted DTAC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 ( | T2 ( | T3 ( | ||
| Energy-adjusted DTAC, median (μmol/day) | 14,262.79 | 18,462.49 | 23,208.09 | |
|
| ||||
| Age (year)† | 56.0 (8.2) | 55.0 (7.0) | 57.0 (10.0) | 0.4 |
| Education (year)† | 4.0 (6.0) | 5.0 (6.0) | 5.0 (6.0) | 0.1 |
| Menopausal years (year)† | 6.5 (9.7) | 4.0 (6.0) | 8.0 (11.0) | 0.9 |
|
| ||||
| Married | 45 (25.7) | 51 (29.1) | 49 (28.0) | 0.3 |
| Single/divorced/single | 13 (7.4) | 8 (4.6) | 9 (5.1) | |
|
| ||||
| High/average | 18 (10.3) | 22 (12.6) | 21 (12.0) | 0.5 |
| Low | 40 (22.9) | 37 (21.0) | 37 (21.0) | |
|
| ||||
| Dietary supplement use | 33 (18.9) | 36 (20.6) | 42 (24.0) | 0.08 |
| Family history of depression | 14 (25.7) | 15 (25.7) | 15 (25.7) | 0.8 |
| CVD | 25 (14.3) | 16 (9.1) | 15 (8.6) | 0.8 |
| Metabolic disorders | 12 (14.3) | 21 (9.1) | 20 (8.6) | 0.1 |
|
| ||||
| Height (cm)† | 154.0 (6.5) | 155.0 (6.5) | 155.7 (7.6) | 0.1 |
| Weight (kg)† | 72.7 (11.8) | 74.0 (12.6) | 74.6 (12.3) | 0.3 |
| BMI (kg/m2)† | 29.6 (8.4) | 30.4 (5.5) | 30.0 (4.7) | 0.8 |
| WC (cm)† | 103.0 (13.6) | 102.5 (14.0) | 106.0 (13.6) | 0.5 |
| Physical activity (MET min/week)† | 460.0 (462.0) | 471.0 (789.0) | 585.7 (1128.0) | 0.02 |
|
| ||||
| Energy intake (kcal/day)‡ | 2369.4 ± 397.6 | 2138.4 ± 450.6 | 2324.6 ± 511.4 | 0.5 |
| Carbohydrate (g/day)† | 331.6 (110.7) | 306.6 (103.4) | 349.8 (108.4) | 0.2 |
| Protein (g/day)‡ | 83.4 ± 17.5 | 77.2 ± 17.0 | 84.9 ± 20.7 | 0.6 |
| Fat (g/day)† | 74.6 (32.6) | 67.6 (17.6) | 67.0 (33.1) | 0.01 |
| Carbohydrate (%EI) | 57.4 ± 5.8 | 60.3 ± 5.4 | 61.5 ± 4.9 | < 0.001 |
| Protein (%EI) | 14.0 ± 1.9 | 14.5 ± 1.8 | 14.6 ± 1.8 | 0.1 |
| Fat (%EI) | 29.5 (8.7) | 27.3 (6.0) | 27.5 (6.4) | 0.003 |
|
| ||||
| Depression† | 8.5 (10.0) | 6.0 (8.0) | 5.5 (9.0) | 0.03 |
| Stress† | 9.0 (9.0) | 10.0 (9.0) | 9.0 (10.0) | 0.4 |
| Anxiety† | 8.0 (6.0) | 7.0 (6.0) | 5.0 (5.0) | 0.02 |
Socioeconomic status defined as: having 3 or less living items for low status, 4–6 living items for average status, and 7–9 living items at home for high status
DTAC dietary total antioxidant capacity, CVD cardiovascular disease, BMI body mass index, WC waist circumference, MET metabolic equivalents task, EI energy intake, DASS depression, anxiety and stress scale
‡Data are expressed as mean ± SD
†Data are expressed as median (IQR)
* Number of subjects having the characteristic with %
** ANOVA test used for continuous variables and chi-square test used for categorical variables
Correlation of DTAC and serum TAC value with intakes of some dietary antioxidant component
| Dietary antioxidant intake | Partial correlations ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTAC | Serum TAC | |||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Vitamin C (mg/day) | 0.53 | < 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.6 |
| β-Cryptoxanthin (μg/day) | 0.43 | < 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.7 |
| β-Carotene (μg/day) | 0.31 | < 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.8 |
| α-Tocopherol (mg/day) | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.3 |
| Lycopene (μg/day) | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.5 |
| Lutein (μg/day) | 0.20 | 0.007 | 0.08 | 0.2 |
| Zinc (mg/day) | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.8 |
| Selenium (μg/day) | 0.04 | 0.5 | 0.14 | 0.06 |
| Magnesium (mg/day) | 0.41 | 0.001 | 0.11 | 0.1 |
DTAC dietary total antioxidant capacity, TAC total antioxidant capacity
† Partial correlations between DTAC and serum TAC. Dietary antioxidants intakes were adjusted for energy
Multivariate linear regression analyses of the energy-adjusted DTAC and depression, stress, and anxiety scores (n = 175)
| DTAC (μmol/day)† | Depression score | Stress score | Anxiety score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient standard β | P | Coefficient standard β | P | Coefficient standard β | P | |
| Unadjusted model | − 0.14 | 0.053 | − 0.05 | 0.3 | − 0.19 | 0.008 |
| Model 1 | − 0.14 | 0.06 | − 0.06 | 0.3 | − 0.19 | 0.01 |
| Model 2 | − 0.16 | 0.03 | − 0.10 | 0.1 | − 0.21 | 0.007 |
Depression, anxiety, stress scores were log10 transformed
DTAC dietary total antioxidant capacity
Model 1, adjustment for age (year) and years since menopause (year)
Model 2, further adjustment for education (year), waist circumference (cm), physical activity (MET min/week), dietary supplement use (yes/no), dietary intake of fiber (g/day), energy (kcal/day) and coffee (g/day)
†DTAC was adjusted for energy intake by residual method
Adjusted mean values for serum biomarkers of oxidative stress across tertiles of energy-adjusted DTAC (n = 175)
| Variables | Tertiles of energy-adjusted DTAC | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 ( | T2 ( | T3 ( | P-value* | Effect size of ANCOVA test | ||||
| Mean | 95% CI | Mean | 95% CI | Mean | 95% CI | |||
| TAC (mM) | 0.44 | 0.42–0.45 | 0.46 | 0.44–0.47 | 0.44 | 0.42–0.45 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| MDA (µM) | 5.3 | 4.7–6.0 | 4.8 | 4.2–5.4 | 3.4 | 3.0–3.8 | < 0.001 | 0.13 |
| Ox-LDL (ng/l) | 1548.8 | 1339.6–1794.7 | 1655.7 | 1432.1–1918.6 | 1489.3 | 1285.2–1725.8 | 0.6 | 0.03 |
| SOD (U/ml) | 36.0 | 34.1–38.1 | 33.8 | 32.0–35.8 | 33.9 | 31.9–35.7 | 0.1 | 0.02 |
Values are geometric means and 95% CI
DTAC dietary total antioxidant capacity, TAC total antioxidant capacity, MDA malondialdehyde, Ox-LDL oxidized low-density lipoprotein, SOD superoxide dismutase
* ANCOVA test, adjusted for age, time since menopause, education (year), waist circumference (cm), physical activity (MET min/week), dietary supplement use (yes/no), dietary intake of fiber (g/day), energy (kcal/day), and coffee (g/day)
Fig. 1Correlation between dietary total antioxidant capacity (DTAC) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (r = − 0.36, P-value < 0.001)
Multivariate linear regression analyses of the energy-adjusted DTAC and serum biomarkers of oxidative stress (n = 175)
| DTAC (μmol/day)† | Coefficient standard β | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| TAC (mM) | 0.006 | 0.9 |
| MDA (µM) | − 0.37 | < 0.001 |
| Ox-LDL (ng/l) | − 0.04 | 0.5 |
| SOD (U/ml) | − 0.13 | 0.07 |
Adjusted for age (year) and years since menopause (year) education (year), waist circumference (cm), physical activity (MET min/week), dietary supplement use (yes/no), dietary intake of fiber (g/day), energy (kcal/day) and coffee (g/day)
Serum biomarkers of oxidative stress were log10 transformed
DTAC dietary total antioxidant capacity, TAC total antioxidant capacity, MDA malondialdehyde, Ox-LDL oxidized low-density lipoprotein, SOD superoxide dismutase
†DTAC was adjusted for energy intake by residual method