Literature DB >> 23770118

The influence of ethical values and food choice motivations on intentions to purchase sustainably sourced foods.

Kylie Dowd1, Karena J Burke.   

Abstract

This study examined a three-step adaptation of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) applied to the intention of consumers to purchase sustainably sourced food. The sample consisted of 137 participants, of which 109 were female, who were recruited through a farmers market and an organic produce outlet in an Australian capital city. Participants completed an online questionnaire containing the TPB scales of attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control and intention; measures of positive moral attitude and ethical self identity; and food choice motives. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to examine the predictive utility of the TPB in isolation (step 1) and the TPB expanded to include the constructs of moral attitude and ethical self-identity (step 2). The results indicated the expansion of the TPB to include these constructs added significantly to the predictive model measuring intention to purchase sustainably sourced food. The third step in the adaptation utilised this expanded TPB model and added a measure of retail channel (where consumers reported buying fresh produce) and 9 food choice motives, in order to assess the predictive utility of the inclusion of choice motivations in this context. Of the 8 food choice motives examined, only health and ethical values significantly predicted intention to purchase sustainably sourced food. However, with the addition of food choice motives, ethical self-identity was no longer a significant predictor of intention to purchase sustainably sourced food. Overall the adapted TPB model explained 76% of the variance in intention to purchase sustainably sourced food.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; Ethical values; Food choice; Food motivations; Sustainable food; Theory of Planned Behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23770118     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  23 in total

1.  Genetically modified food and consumer risk responsibility: The effect of regulatory design and risk type on cognitive information processing.

Authors:  Ashkan Pakseresht; Anna Kristina Edenbrandt; Carl Johan Lagerkvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Psychological determinants of consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition in 9 European countries.

Authors:  Rui Poínhos; Ivo A van der Lans; Audrey Rankin; Arnout R H Fischer; Brendan Bunting; Sharron Kuznesof; Barbara Stewart-Knox; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Capturing health and eating status through a nutritional perception screening questionnaire (NPSQ9) in a randomised internet-based personalised nutrition intervention: the Food4Me study.

Authors:  Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Carlos Celis-Morales; Katherine M Livingstone; Barbara Stewart-Knox; Audrey Rankin; Anna L Macready; Rosalind Fallaize; Clare B O'Donovan; Hannah Forster; Clara Woolhead; Marianne C Walsh; Christina P Lambrinou; George Moschonis; Yannis Manios; Miroslaw Jarosz; Hannelore Daniel; Eileen R Gibney; Lorraine Brennan; Thomas E Gundersen; Christian A Drevon; Mike Gibney; Cyril F M Marsaux; Wim H M Saris; Julie A Lovegrove; Lynn J Frewer; John C Mathers; J Alfredo Martinez
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Dilemma between health and environmental motives when purchasing animal food products: sociodemographic and nutritional characteristics of consumers.

Authors:  Sandrine Péneau; Philippine Fassier; Benjamin Allès; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Serge Hercberg; Caroline Méjean
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  To Buy or Not to Buy? Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Suboptimal Food.

Authors:  Song-Lin Wong; Cheng-Chin Hsu; Han-Shen Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Relationships between Motivations for Food Choices and Consumption of Food Groups: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Survey in Manufacturing Workers in Brazil.

Authors:  Anissa M Souza; Ingrid W L Bezerra; Gabriela S Pereira; Karina G Torres; Raiane M Costa; Antonio G Oliveira
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Healthy Foods as Proxy for Functional Foods: Consumers' Awareness, Perception, and Demand for Natural Functional Foods in Pakistan.

Authors:  Akhter Ali; Dil Bahadur Rahut
Journal:  Int J Food Sci       Date:  2019-05-02

8.  Explaining Chinese Consumers' Green Food Purchase Intentions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour.

Authors:  Xin Qi; Angelika Ploeger
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-26

9.  Awareness of climate change and the dietary choices of young adults in Finland: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Essi A E Korkala; Timo T Hugg; Jouni J K Jaakkola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Adaptation of the Food Choice Questionnaire: the case of Hungary.

Authors:  Zoltán Szakály; Enikő Kontor; Sándor Kovács; József Popp; Károly Pető; Zsolt Polereczki
Journal:  Br Food J       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.518

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.