| Literature DB >> 34071728 |
Ira Handayani1,2, Hamada Saad3,4, Shanti Ratnakomala5, Puspita Lisdiyanti2, Wien Kusharyoto2, Janina Krause1, Andreas Kulik1, Wolfgang Wohlleben1, Saefuddin Aziz3, Harald Gross3, Athina Gavriilidou6, Nadine Ziemert6,7, Yvonne Mast1,7,8,9.
Abstract
Indonesia is one of the most biodiverse countries in the world and a promising resource for novel natural compound producers. Actinomycetes produce about two thirds of all clinically used antibiotics. Thus, exploiting Indonesia's microbial diversity for actinomycetes may lead to the discovery of novel antibiotics. A total of 422 actinomycete strains were isolated from three different unique areas in Indonesia and tested for their antimicrobial activity. Nine potent bioactive strains were prioritized for further drug screening approaches. The nine strains were cultivated in different solid and liquid media, and a combination of genome mining analysis and mass spectrometry (MS)-based molecular networking was employed to identify potential novel compounds. By correlating secondary metabolite gene cluster data with MS-based molecular networking results, we identified several gene cluster-encoded biosynthetic products from the nine strains, including naphthyridinomycin, amicetin, echinomycin, tirandamycin, antimycin, and desferrioxamine B. Moreover, 16 putative ion clusters and numerous gene clusters were detected that could not be associated with any known compound, indicating that the strains can produce novel secondary metabolites. Our results demonstrate that sampling of actinomycetes from unique and biodiversity-rich habitats, such as Indonesia, along with a combination of gene cluster networking and molecular networking approaches, accelerates natural product identification.Entities:
Keywords: GNPS; Indonesia; bioactivity; biodiversity; drug screening; gene cluster networking; novel antibiotics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34071728 PMCID: PMC8227522 DOI: 10.3390/md19060316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Indonesian strains, isolation method, source of isolation (compare Figure 1), and most closely related species (%) based on 16S rRNA gene sequence phylogenetic analysis with EzTaxon.
| Strain ( | Isolation Method | Source of Isolation | Most Closely Related Species Based on 16S rDNA Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHP 22-7 | phenol | Soil under a ketapang tree ( | |
| SHP 20-4 | phenol | Soil under a kina tree ( | |
| SHP 2-1 | phenol | Soil under a hiyeb tree ( | |
| DHE 17-7 | dry heat | Soil under a ficus tree ( | |
| DHE 12-3 | dry heat | Soil under a cempedak tree ( | |
| DHE 7-1 | dry heat | Soil under a terok tree ( | |
| DHE 6-7 | dry heat | Soil under forest snake fruit tree ( | |
| DHE 5-1 | dry heat | Soil under a banana tree ( | |
| BSE 7-9 | NBRC medium 802 | Mangrove sediment near plant rhizosphere, Kuta (C1), Bali Island | |
| BSE 7F | NBRC medium 802 | Mangrove sediment near plant rhizosphere, Kuta (C1), Bali Island | |
| I3 | humic acid-vitamin + chlorine 1% | Mangrove sediment from Pantai Tanjung Kelor, Sekotong (D2), West Lombok Island | |
| I4 | humic acid-vitamin + chlorine 1% | Mangrove sediment from Pantai Tanjung Kelor, Sekotong (D2), West Lombok Island | |
| I5 | humic acid-vitamin + chlorine 1% | Mangrove sediment from Pantai Tanjung Kelor, Sekotong (D2), West Lombok Island | |
| I6 | humic acid-vitamin + chlorine 1% | Mangrove sediment from Pantai Tanjung Kelor, Sekotong (D2), West Lombok Island | |
| I8 | humic acid-vitamin | Sea sands from Pantai Koeta (D3), Lombok Island | |
| I9 | humic acid-vitamin | Sea sands from Pantai Koeta (D3), Lombok Island |
Figure 1Map of Indonesia showing three geographical regions (A). Sampling site location in Enggano Island (B), Bali Island (C), and Lombok Island (D). Red dot shows the sampling locations at Enggano Island, B1: Desa Meok; B2: Desa Banjar Sari; B3: Bak Blau Waterspring, Desa Meok; B4: Desa Boboyo; B5: Desa Malakoni; at Bali Island C1 for Kuta; and Lombok Island D1: Pantai Cemara, Lembar; D2: Pantai Tanjung Kelor, Sekotong; D3: Pantai Koeta.
Figure 2Antimicrobial bioassays with 16 Indonesian actinomycetes strain samples against Gram-positive (A) and Gram-negative test strains (B). Inhibition zone diameters of agar plug test assays are given in mm. Agar plugs were used after ten days of growth of the respective actinomycetes strains. Data shown are as the result of three independent biological replicates.
Data from pairwise comparisons between genome sequences from nine Indonesian strains and their closest related strains based on dDDH analysis. “Query strain” refers to analyzed strain, and “subject strain” refers to most closely related Indonesian strain sample. Degree of relatedness is given as dDDH distance formula d4 as previously described by Meyer-Kolthoff et al. [66].
| Query Strain | Subject Strain | dDDH ( |
|---|---|---|
| I3 | I4 | 99.6 |
| BSE 7-9 | BSE 7F | 95.7 |
| DHE 17-7 | SHP 22-7 | 86.7 |
| I4 | I5 | 82.6 |
| I3 | I5 | 82.5 |
| BSE 7F | I5 | 78.4 |
| BSE 7-9 | I5 | 78.4 |
| BSE 7-9 | I4 | 77.2 |
| BSE 7F | I4 | 77.2 |
| BSE 7F | I3 | 77 |
| BSE 7-9 | I3 | 77 |
| I6 | 51.5 | |
| SHP 22-7 | 43.6 | |
| DHE 17-7 | 40.3 | |
| DHE 7-1 | 32.3 | |
| I3 | 31.5 | |
| BSE 7-9 | 31.5 | |
| I5 | 31.5 | |
| I4 | 31.4 | |
| BSE 7F | 31.4 |
Figure 3Whole-genome sequence tree generated with the TYGS web server for nine Indonesian Streptomyces isolates (highlighted by red boxes) and closely related type strains. Tree inferred with FastME from GBDP distances was determined from genome sequences. The branch lengths are scaled in terms of GBDP distance formula d5. The numbers above branches indicate GBDP pseudobootstrap support values > 60% from 100 replications, with an average branch support of 84.4%. The tree was rooted at the midpoint.
List of Indonesian actinomycetes strains with number and type of BGCs as predicted by antiSMASH analysis.
| Strain | Total BGCs | PKS | NRPS | Hybrid BGC | Terpene | RiPP | Siderophore | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DHE 17-7 | 30 | 6 | 7 | - | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| DHE 7-1 | 27 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | - | 3 | 4 |
| SHP 22-7 | 25 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| I4 | 19 | 3 | 2 | - | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| I3 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| I5 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| BSE 7F | 23 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| BSE 7-9 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| I6 | 24 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
Figure 4Presence (grey color) and absence (white color) of BGCs in nine Indonesian strains as predicted by antiSMASH analysis with similarity above 60%.
Figure 5Similarity network of the predicted biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) of the nine Indonesian Streptomyces strains. Shared similar BGCs are indicated by a connected line. Each node represents a specific BGC type (labeled with different colors). The shape node represents the same species, i.e., clade A (SHP 22-7 and DHE 17-7) indicated with diamond, clade B (I4, I5, BSE 7F, and BSE 7-9) shown with ellipse, clade C (DHE 7-1) with a cube, and clade D (I6) indicated with a triangle. BGCs with similarities less than 60% are highlighted by red boxes: (A) Ectoine-butyrolactone-NRPS-T1PKS; (B) T3PKS; (C) Otherks-T1PKS, (D) Amglyccyc; (E) TransAT-PKS; (F) Phenazine; (G) Other; and (H) Indole.
Figure 6Molecular networking of extract and fraction samples from nine Indonesian Streptomyces strains. Molecular families containing a known substance are highlighted by blue boxes.
Correlation between known compounds and BGC distribution in the nine Indonesian strains. A checkmark (√) indicates identified BGC in the studied strain, a question mark (?) indicates that BGC is not identified in the studied strain, and a minus sign (-) indicates the compound is not present in the medium.
| Ion Cluster Name | Adduct | Main Producer | BGC Identified | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solid | Liquid | ||||
| Ferrioxamine D1 | 656.2830 | [M − 2H + Fe]+ | SHP 22-7; I3; I4; I6 | - | √ |
| Naphthyridinomycin A (C21H28N3O6) | 418.1980 | [M + H]+ | I3; I4; I5 | BSE 7F; BSE 7-9; I5 | √ |
| Amicetin (C29H43N6O9) | 619.3100 | [M + H]+ | - | SHP 22-7; DHE 17-7 | √ |
| Antimycin A2 (C27H39N2O9) | 535.2659 | [M + H]+ | - | BSE 7F | √ |
| ECO-0501 | 837.5022 | [M + H]+ | - | DHE 17-7 | ? |
| Echinoserine | 1137.4504 | [M + H]+ | I6 | - | √ |
| Echinomycin | 1101.4279 | [M + H]+ | I6 | - | √ |
| Tirandamycin A (C18H25O6) | 337.1650 | [M + H]+ | I6 | - | √ |
| Staurosporine | 467.2070 | [M + H]+ | I6 | √ | |
Overview of analogs and putative new compounds identified for the nine Indonesian Streptomyces strains. A minus sign (-) indicates that the compound is not present in the medium.
| Ion Cluster Description | Adduct | Main Producer and Media Type | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solid | Liquid | |||
| Ferrioxamine analogs | 627.3303 | [M − 2H + Fe]+ | I3; I4; I6; DHE 17-7 | - |
| 788.3753 | [M − 2H + Fe]+ | BSE 7-9 | - | |
| 840.4060 | [M − 2H + Fe]+ | - | BSE 7-9 | |
| 640.2520 | [M − 2H + Fe]+ | - | DHE 17-7 | |
| 654.2685 | [M − 2H + Fe]+ | DHE 17-7 | - | |
| Putative new peptides | 598.2834 | [M + 2H]2+ | I3, I5, BSE 7F | - |
| 662.8048 | [M + 2H]2+ | I3, I5, BSE 7F | - | |
| 727.3259 | [M + 2H]2+ | I3, I5, BSE 7F | - | |
| Putative new compound group I | 821.3349 | [M + H]+ | SHP 22-7 | - |
| 734.3031 | [M + H]+ | SHP 22-7 | - | |
| 679.2430 | [M + H]+ | SHP 22-7 | - | |
| 647.2710 | [M + H]+ | SHP 22-7 | - | |
| Putative new compound group II | 435.2774 | [M + 2H]2+ | - | DHE 17-7 |
| 442.2857 | [M + 2H]2+ | - | DHE 17-7 | |
| 449.2934 | [M + 2H]2+ | - | DHE 17-7 | |
| 474.2833 | [M + 2H]2+ | - | DHE 17-7 | |