| Literature DB >> 34069816 |
Magali Seguret1, Eva Vermersch1, Charlène Jouve1, Jean-Sébastien Hulot1,2.
Abstract
Cardiac tissue engineering aims at creating contractile structures that can optimally reproduce the features of human cardiac tissue. These constructs are becoming valuable tools to model some of the cardiac functions, to set preclinical platforms for drug testing, or to alternatively be used as therapies for cardiac repair approaches. Most of the recent developments in cardiac tissue engineering have been made possible by important advances regarding the efficient generation of cardiac cells from pluripotent stem cells and the use of novel biomaterials and microfabrication methods. Different combinations of cells, biomaterials, scaffolds, and geometries are however possible, which results in different types of structures with gradual complexities and abilities to mimic the native cardiac tissue. Here, we intend to cover key aspects of tissue engineering applied to cardiology and the consequent development of cardiac organoids. This review presents various facets of the construction of human cardiac 3D constructs, from the choice of the components to their patterning, the final geometry of generated tissues, and the subsequent readouts and applications to model and treat cardiac diseases.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac disease models; cardiomyopathies; drug evaluation; organoids; tissue engineering
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069816 PMCID: PMC8157277 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9050563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1Strategies to build 3D-ECTs without scaffolds, advantages, and drawbacks.
Figure 2Strategies to build 3D-ECTs with scaffolds, advantages, and drawbacks.
Figure 3Different geometries for engineered cardiac tissues, their readouts, advantages and downsides, and their preferential applications.
Table summarizing the characteristics of some engineered cardiac tissues from hiPSC-CMs or hESC-CMs in the literature. FFR: Force–Frequency Relationship. ND: Not defined.
| Reference | Shape | Cardiac Cells | Supporting Cells | Scaffold | Contractility Performances | FFR | Frank-Starling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhang et al., 2013 [ | Cardiac patch | hESC-CMs | None | Fibrinogen | 11.8 ± 4.5 mN/mm | ND | Yes |
| Shadrin et al., 2017 [ | Cardiac patch | hiPSC-CMs | None | Fibrinogen | 13.3 ± 1.0 mN/mm | Flat to negative | Yes |
| Turnbull et al., 2014 [ | Cardiac strip | hiPSC-CMs | None | Bovine collagen type I | 0.57 mN/mm | Negative | Yes |
| Zhao et al., 2019 [ | Cardiac strip | hiPSC-CMs | None | Rat tail collagen | 0.051 ± 0.025 mN/mm | Positive | ND |
| Mannhardt et al., 2016 [ | Cardiac strip | hiPSC-CMs | None | Fibrin | 0.5 mN/mm | Flat | Yes |
| Ronaldson-Bouchard et al., 2018 [ | Cardiac strip | hiPSC-CMs | Human dermal fibroblasts | Fibrinogen | ∼2.5 mN/mm | Positive | ND |
| Tulloch et al., 2011 [ | Cardiac strip | hESC-CMs | Stromal | Collagen | 0.08 mN/mm | ND | Yes |
| Guyette et al., 2016 [ | Cardiac strip | hiPSC-CMs | None | Decellularized ECM | 124.1 ± 94.7 µN | Flat | ND |
| Goldfracht et al., 2020 [ | Cardiac ring | hESC-CMs | None | Bovine collagen | 0.92 ± 0.09 mN/mm | ND | Yes |
| Li et al., 2020 [ | Cardiac ring | hiPSC-CMs | None | None | 0.23 ± 0.12 mN/mm | ND | Yes |
| Tiburcy et al., 2017 [ | Cardiac ring | hESC-CMs | Fibroblasts | Rat tail collagen | 6.2 ± 0.8 mN/mm | Positive | Yes |
| Li et al., 2019 [ | Cardiac chamber | hESC-CMs | Fibroblasts | Bovine collagen type I | Pressure ∼50 | ND | ND |
| Guyette et al., 2016 [ | Cardiac chamber | hiPSC-CMs | None | Decellularized ECM | Pressure: 2.4 ± 0.1 mm Hg | ND | ND |