Ron Feiner1,2, Leeya Engel2,3, Sharon Fleischer1,2, Maayan Malki1,3, Idan Gal1, Assaf Shapira1, Yosi Shacham-Diamand4, Tal Dvir1,2,3. 1. The Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. 2. The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. 3. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. 4. Department of Physical Electronics, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Abstract
In cardiac tissue engineering approaches to treat myocardial infarction, cardiac cells are seeded within three-dimensional porous scaffolds to create functional cardiac patches. However, current cardiac patches do not allow for online monitoring and reporting of engineered-tissue performance, and do not interfere to deliver signals for patch activation or to enable its integration with the host. Here, we report an engineered cardiac patch that integrates cardiac cells with flexible, freestanding electronics and a 3D nanocomposite scaffold. The patch exhibited robust electronic properties, enabling the recording of cellular electrical activities and the on-demand provision of electrical stimulation for synchronizing cell contraction. We also show that electroactive polymers containing biological factors can be deposited on designated electrodes to release drugs in the patch microenvironment on demand. We expect that the integration of complex electronics within cardiac patches will eventually provide therapeutic control and regulation of cardiac function.
In cardiac tissue engineering approaches to treat myocardial infarction, cardiac cells are seeded within three-dimensional porous scaffolds to create functional cardiac patches. However, current cardiac patches do not allow for online monitoring and reporting of engineered-tissue performance, and do not interfere to deliver signals for patch activation or to enable its integration with the host. Here, we report an engineered cardiac patch that integrates cardiac cells with flexible, freestanding electronics and a 3D nanocomposite scaffold. The patch exhibited robust electronic properties, enabling the recording of cellular electrical activities and the on-demand provision of electrical stimulation for synchronizing cell contraction. We also show that electroactive polymers containing biological factors can be deposited on designated electrodes to release drugs in the patch microenvironment on demand. We expect that the integration of complex electronics within cardiac patches will eventually provide therapeutic control and regulation of cardiac function.
Cardiac patches for treating heart disease are created by seeding contracting cells in or
onto 3D biomaterials prior to transplantation. These materials serve as temporary
scaffolds, supporting the cells and promoting their reorganization into functional
tissues. Following implantation and full integration within the host, the scaffold
degrades, leaving a functional cardiac patch on the defected organ1. In recent years it has been recognized that effective
organization of cells into cardiac tissues with morphological and physiological features
resembling those in vivo requires a 3D scaffold that precisely mimics
the structural, biochemical and mechanical properties of the natural heart's
extracellular matrix (ECM). Thus, researchers initially focused on developing
technological tools to recapitulate aspects of this specialized microenvironment2–7. It
was previously shown that engineered cardiac tissues exhibit elongated and aligned
morphology, synchronous contraction, and anisotropic transfer of the electrical signal
when grown on various scaffolds5,8–10.
Furthermore, cardiac patches have been used to significantly improve heart function
after infarction11–14. However, once the 3D cardiac patches have been engineered,
in vitro assessment of their quality in terms of electrical
activity without affecting their performance is limited. This situation might lead to
implantation of cardiac patches with limited or no potential to regenerate the infarcted
heart. The cells engineered within the 3D biomaterial may be electrophysiologically
inactive, jeopardizing the efficacy of the treatment. More importantly, the ability to
monitor the performance of these patches and control their function following
implantation is completely lost.Recently, Tian and colleagues pioneered an integrated sensory system based on a nanowire
field-effect transistor array to monitor the local electrical activity within 3D
cardiomyocyte constructs15. Despite this
groundbreaking progress, several central needs remain unmet. For example, questions
remain regarding how to utilize the received data, which provide information about cell
function, for interfering and encouraging tissue assembly and ensuring proper
function.To overcome this challenge, we introduce a conceptually new approach, where a dedicated
free-standing electronic network is built within an engineered tissue and used to
collect data from its surroundings. When required, the electronics can be remotely
manipulated to activate the growing tissue, by providing electrical stimulation, and/or
by controlling the release of drugs within the 3D microenvironment to affect the
engineered tissue or the host.Our approach (Fig. 1) involved the fabrication of a
complex, free-standing, porous electronic mesh with multiple electrodes designated for
recording tissue function, for providing electrical stimulation and for spatially
releasing biochemical factors to affect the engineered tissue or its surroundings. The
electronic network was designed to be thin and porous (>99%)15 to have minimal interference with the engineered tissue,
allowing tissue growth in-between the electrodes (detailed technical aspects of the
electronics can be found in the Methods section).
Electroactive polymers were deposited on designated electrodes to allow for efficient,
on demand, controlled release of drugs. Then, a 3D biomaterial scaffold composed of a
dense nanofiber network was integrated with the electronics and cardiac cells were
seeded into the hybrid to complete the 3D cardiac tissue. Finally, the engineered tissue
was folded to create a thick, stand-alone, microelectronic cardiac patch (microECP)
comprising embedded elements for sensing, stimulation and regulation.
Figure 1
Schematics of the microelectronic cardiac patch concept.
The flexible, freestanding electronic mesh device is designed to include electrodes for sensing
of tissue electrical activity, for cell and tissue electrical stimulation and
for controlled release of biomolecules within the tissue microenvironment. The
device is integrated with an electrospun nanofiber scaffold to provide a
supporting 3D microenvironment for cardiac tissue growth and tissue assembly.
The internal electronic device provides on-line monitoring of tissue function,
and if needed can interfere to activate it. Incorporation of electroactive
polymers onto designated electrodes enables control over the release of proteins
and small molecules that may promote tissue growth or integration with the
host.
Nanowire-based field effect transistors allow for a very high signal to noise ratio and
the option of intracellular recordings16.
However, they may be limited in supplying current to their surroundings, and therefore
may not be effective for actuating cells or triggering drug release17. To overcome impedance limitations arising from small electrode
size18 and to enable the supply of sufficient
current, we designed our device to include larger gold electrodes. The electronic chip
was fabricated on a nickel sacrificial layer, which was subsequently removed to yield
completely free-standing, flexible electronics (Methods and Supplementary
Figs S1). This will allow future in vivo work, when the
microECP could be easily transplanted on the infarcted heart. To ensure exclusive
electrical interaction at the end of the gold electrodes, they were deposited on a thin,
patterned SU-8 substrate, onto which an additional thin SU-8 layer was deposited and
patterned to provide passivation (Methods and Supplementary Fig. S2). The chip
(Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. S3) included
32 gold electrodes (width= 10 µm and thickness= 200 nm) terminating with exposed
square pads. Twenty eight pads were designated for recording and stimulation (50x50
µm2; Fig. 2b), and four
larger pads (150x150 µm2) were designed to accommodate controlled
release systems (Fig. 2c). A rough nanoscale layer
of titanium nitride (TiN) was deposited on the gold pads to increase their surface area
and thus improve cell adherence19 (Fig. 2d and e, and Supplementary Fig. S4 and S5). The electronic network was
designed to be flexible to enable rolling or folding together with the biomaterial
scaffold to create a thick 3D structure (Fig. 2f and
g and Supplementary Fig.
S6). Thus, distant electrodes within the electronics are re-organized in
space to form a denser electrode network and enable 3D monitoring of tissue function. As
the electronics were designed to be thin, and must withstand mechanical forces for long
periods of time, such manipulation could result in degradation of the metal electrode
network, compromising device performance. Therefore, we ensured that rolling or folding
of the fabricated device did not alter electrode conductance. (Fig. 2h).
Figure 2
Free-standing electronic mesh device.
a, An image of a free-standing, flexible device consisting of 32 gold electrodes
dispersed within a porous mesh of SU-8. b,c, Scanning electron
micrographs (SEM) of a 50/50 μm2 electrode pad designated for
recording cellular electrical activities and cell and tissue stimulation
(b) and a larger 150/150 μm2 electrode pad,
on which electroactive polymer is deposited for controlling the release of
biomolecules (that is, growth factors and small molecules) (c).
Scale bars, 50 µm. d,e, Atomic force microscopy images of a
pristine gold electrode pad (d) and an electrode with a nanoscale
layer of titanium nitride deposited to increase surface area (e).
f, Schematic representation of electrode location in a rolled
device (green halos represent drug release). g, SEM image of a
rolled device as presented in the dashed square of the scheme. A
sensing/stimulating electrode (yellow areas in panel f) can be seen in the upper
layer, and an electrode designated for controlled release (brown areas in panel
f) is in the underlying layer. Scale bar, 200 µm. h,
Assessment of electrode conductance as a function of increasing radii of
curvature before and after manipulation of the device. No significant difference
was detected. All error bars represent the standard deviation (n=3 devices).
To complete the fabrication process of the chip and incorporate on-demand controlled
release systems that can influence tissue growth and function, electroactive polymers
were deposited on designated pads. Such polymers are ideal for designing efficient drug
delivery systems, where an “on/off” drug release mechanism is required or
for releasing the entire payload at once20,21. Here, we chose to focus on two types of
polymers; one can store and release positively charged proteins, and the other can
release negatively charged small molecules (Fig.
3). For protein release, chondroitin 4-sulfate (CS) was cross-linked with
ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (EGDGE) and deposited on the designated electrodes. As
a proof-of-concept, lysozyme was selected as a model protein and loaded into the
tortuous pores of the hydrogel by equilibrium swelling20. Owing to electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged
polymeric backbone, the positively charged protein could be stored within the hydrogel
matrix. Upon application of electrical stimulation the gel was protonated and
microscopically shrunk20, and the protein could
be released into the hydrogel’s microenvironment or surroundings in a
voltage-dependent manner (Fig. 3a, b). Alternating
the electrical stimulation showed an on/off release profile of the protein from the
devices into the cellular compartment (Fig. 3c).
Furthermore, long-term repetitive applications of electrical stimuli resulted in protein
release for at least 28 days (Supplementary Fig. S7), without affecting gel stability (Supplementary Fig. S8).
Figure 3
Controlled release of biomolecules from the electronic device.
a, Schematic representation of a system designed to release positively charged
proteins (blue circles). The protein is loaded by equilibrium swelling into the
tortuous pores of a negatively charged chondroitin sulfate (CS) hydrogel. Upon
application of an electric field, the hydrogel shrinks and the negative charge
is neutralized leading to the release of the positively charged protein (blue
circles). b,c, As a proof-of-concept lysozyme was chosen as a model
protein. b, Lysozyme release from within the CS electroactive
system as a function of applied voltage. c,On-Off protein release
profile from a CS system. d, SDF-1 release under an applied
voltage. e, Cell migration under the influence of SDF-1 released
from the microECP. f, Schematic representation of a system designed
to release negatively charged drugs. The pyrrole monomers (black circles) are
oxidized leading to the creation of a polypyrrole (PPy) film containing the
negatively charged drug (blue circles). Upon PPy reduction the electrostatic
bonds between the polymer and the drugs are broken leading to the release of the
drug. g, SEM image of a PPy film containing the negatively charged
small molecule DEX, deposited onto the controlled release electrode. Scale bar,
50 µm. h, DEX release from the PPy film as a function of
applied voltage. i, Immune cell function as measured by NO
secretion (measured as nitrite, a stable metabolite of NO) from activated
macrophages, as a response to the dexamethasone released from the microECP. All
error bars represent the standard deviation (n≥3).
Next, to evaluate the ability of the system to release physiologically-relevant factors
we focused on stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), a stem cell chemoattractant22,23 . The
cytokine could be loaded and stored within the hydrogel matrix, as a function of its
initial concentration in the solution (Supplementary Fig. S9) and released upon application of an electric field
(Fig. 3d). As SDF-1 has the ability to recruit
bone marrow-derived stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells through strong
interactions with CXCR4 receptors, the released cytokine promoted cell migration
in vitro (Fig. 3e). In
vivo release of SDF-1 from the patch may recruit stem cells into the
engineered tissue, leading to enhanced vascularization23. As SDF-1 is also known to activate ERK1/2 and Akt signalling pathways,
which promote cardioprotection11, its release
into the cellular microenvironment may also have beneficial effects on the cardiac cells
comprising the patch. Moreover, as in principle the system can store and release other
positively charged growth factors, cell viability can be maintained by releasing
insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). By releasing vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF) the system may promote enhanced vascularization11. Overall, these physiological processes can improve integration of the
engineered tissue with the healthy part of the heart by prolonging cell survival until
blood vessel networks can infiltrate into the porous patch to nourish it24.To store and release negatively charged drugs, polypyrrole (PPy), loaded with the model
drug, dexamethasone (DEX), was deposited onto the electrodes by electropolymerization
(Fig. 3f, g). As shown, the drug-loaded polymer
covered the electrode designated for controlled release (Fig. 3g and Supplementary
Fig. S10). Polymer volume could be adjusted by increasing the amount of
charge inserted in the electropolymerization process (Supplementary Fig. S10), which
leads to higher loading of the drug25 for
extended treatment periods. Similar to the release of the positively charged protein,
the PPy released its cargo according to the degree of the applied stimulation (Fig. 3h). No change in electrode conductance could be
observed following voltage application (Supplementary Fig. S11). As DEX is an anti-inflammatory drug26, its release into the graft’s
surroundings after transplantation may reduce inflammation caused by the graft itself,
or that occurring as a consequence of the pathology27. In either case, DEX release may encourage better integration with the
host tissue and improve the efficacy of the treatment28. To evaluate the potential of the released DEX to decrease inflammation,
macrophages, activated with interferon γ were added to the culture medium
containing the released drug. As shown, the released DEX attenuated the activation of
the macrophages as determined by their nitric oxide secretion29 (Fig. 3i). As PPy is not
limited to delivering DEX, other negatively-charged small molecules, such as glutamate,
which has a protective effect on cardiac function during myocardial infarction,30,31 can be
incorporated into the system to affect the cardiac cells within the patch.Overall, the ability to remotely release drugs on demand within an engineered tissue through the built-in electronics, represents a significant improvement in tissue engineering, allowing better control over tissue growth or promoting better integration after transplantation.Engineering a functional cardiac patch requires seeding cardiac cells within a 3D
scaffold that mimics the natural ECM. This scaffold should encourage cell-matrix and
cell-cell interactions and promote cell elongation, alignment and cardiac bundle
formation32. Therefore, electrospinning was
used to deposit nanocomposite polycaprolactone-gelatin fibers onto the electronics,
creating a biomaterial-electronics hybrid (Fig.
4a). The fibers had an average diameter of 287±67 nm, mimicking the
endomysial fibers in the natural heart matrix (Supplementary Fig. S12). These fibers are a meshwork of fibrils
with diameters of tens to hundreds of nanometers, surrounding individual cardiomyocytes,
connecting to their plasma membrane through integrins and forming interactions between
the ECM and cytoskeleton proteins33. The
electrospun fiber scaffold had a porous structure to allow cell penetration to the
recording/stimulation electrodes (Fig. 4b), and to
enable drug diffusion from the electroactive polymers into the cellular
microenvironment, while concomitantly preventing polymer delamination from the electrode
(Fig. 4c). Next, cardiac cells (cardiomyocytes
and fibroblasts), isolated from the left ventricles of neonatal rat hearts were seeded
into the electronic scaffolds and the hybrid was folded to create a ~4 mm thick
microECP (Fig. 4d and e). As the layers were not
tightly packed, oxygen within the medium could easily diffuse to nourish the cells.
Figure 4
Biomaterial-electronics hybrid.
a, A stitched optical image of nanocomposite fibers of polycaprolactone-gelatin
deposited on the electronic mesh. Scale bar, 1.5 mm. Inset, a single
sensing/stimulating electrode covered with the nanofiber scaffold.
b, SEM image of a recording/stimulating electrode covered by
electrospun fibers. Scale bar, 20 µm. c, The deposited
electroactive polymer on the designated electrode was held by the nanocomposite
fibers. Scale bar, 50 µm. d, Schematic representation of the
process for cell seeding and scaffold folding to create a thick 3D microECP. The
electronic mesh is shown in blue, electrospun fibers are in grey, drug release
systems are in brown, the released drug is in green and the cells appear in red.
e, An image of the folded microECP after 7 days of cultivation
with cardiac cells.
The potential of the hybrid system to support cardiac tissue assembly was assessed.
Confocal fluorescence microscopy of the engineered tissue revealed that the cells were
homogenously distributed throughout the hybrid scaffold (Fig. 5a), interacted with the nanofibers and were in close contact with the
electrodes (Figure 5b-d). Higher magnification of the cells revealed that the
cardiomyocytes were elongated, with a high aspect ratio and massive striation (Fig. 5b), providing information on the maturation of
the cells and formation of tissue with hallmarks of the native myocardium34. In its folded state, distant electrodes were
brought into close proximity to provide sensing from different layers of the engineered
tissue (Fig. 5c). Then, the in
vitro viability of the cardiac cells was evaluated over 7 days by measuring
their metabolic activity. As shown, the electronics did not have any effect on the
viability of the cardiac cells (Fig. 5e),
suggesting that in addition to a therapeutic approach, the system can be exploited for
in vitro studies, such as drug screening assays in a 3D
microenvironment35.
Figure 5
Tissue organization and function within the 3D electronic scaffold.
a, Confocal microscope image showing the assembled cardiac tissue within the
biomaterial/electronics hybrid. A sensing/stimulating electrode can be seen in
the middle. Scale bar, 50 µm. Sarcomeric actinin in pink, nuclei are in
blue (Hoechst 33258). b, Zoomed-in image of cardiac cells revealing
cell elongation and massive striation. Scale bar, 10 µm. c,
Bright field microscope image of a folded device depicting distant electrodes
brought into close proximity by folding. Scale bar, 30 µm.
d, 3D reconstruction of the cardiac tissue enveloping the
electronic mesh, and distributed both above and beneath the electrode and
polymer mesh. Scale bar, 50 µm. e, Comparison of cell
viability of cells cultured with (yellow) and without (blue) the electronic
mesh. Viability was measured by a Prestoblue metabolic activity assay. n.s.
denotes not significant. All error bars represent the standard deviation
(n≥3). f, Electrophysiological data collected in parallel
from 9 different electrodes throughout the microECP. g, Recordings
of cellular electrical activity in parallel with quantification of calcium
transients (bottom row, quantified through fluorescence intensity), before and
after the addition of norepinephrine.
The ability of the system to detect electrical signals, produced by cardiomyocytes in
various locations in the 3D scaffold was demonstrated (Fig
5f, and Supplementary Fig.
S13). The recorded spikes were regularly spaced with a frequency of
~1-2 Hz and exhibited a shape and width consistent with cardiomyocyte
extracellular signals36. The ability of the
system to detect changes in the frequency of electrical signals in response to the
addition of norepinephrine (NE) was investigated. Recording from the same electrode
before and after perturbation revealed a twofold increase in signal frequency following
drug supplement to the culture (Fig. 5g). To
validate the reliability of the recorded extracellular signals calcium imaging was
performed simultaneously with microECP sensing (Fig.
5g). Measuring the conduction velocity between electrodes revealed a signal
propagation of ~17cm/s in accordance with reported in-vitro
measurements of engineered cardiac tissues (Supplementary Fig. S14)37.Another essential feature within engineered cardiac patches is the ability to remotely
interfere with cell function and, when needed, to provide spatiotemporal electrical
stimulation. Such stimulation will pace the seeded cells, activate the non-contracting
cells and synchronize cell contraction throughout the patch. To demonstrate the ability
of the electronics to improve patch function, a non-synchronously-contracting patch was
selected, and contractions throughout the engineered tissue were assessed. Calcium
transient imaging in 10, randomly-chosen locations within the microECP revealed that
some of the areas of the tissue did not contract, and others contracted at different
time points (Fig. 6a and b, and Supplementary movie M1). This
phenomenon is recognized in cardiac tissue engineering and may jeopardize the
therapeutic success of this approach38. Remotely
interfering by applying acute electrical stimulation (3 V, 50 ms) at different
frequencies (1 and 2 Hz) activated the cells throughout the patch and synchronized their
contractions (Fig. 6b, and Supplementary movies 2 and 3). Furthermore, by applying
electrical stimulation in the opposite direction of the observed electrical signal
propagation, tissue contraction could be manipulated and reversed (Supplementary Movies 4 and 5, Fig. 6c and Supplementary
Fig. S15). Detailed experiments revealed that these electrical manipulations
did not affect electrode conductivity (Supplementary Fig. S16), scaffold integrity (Supplementary Fig S17), or cell
viability (Supplementary Fig.
S18).
Figure 6
Remote control over the microECP function.
a, Fluorescence micrograph showing the regions of interest used for data
quantification of calcium imaging. Scale bar, 100 µm. b,
Quantification of calcium transients (as quantified through normalized
fluorescence intensity) without perturbation (I) and with a 3 V, 50
ms, 1 Hz (II), and 2 Hz (III) pacing regime (separate
regions of interest are represented in different colours). c, Heat
maps showing reversal of signal propagation of the engineered cardiac tissue by
electrical stimulation. Scale bar, 200 µm.
Overall, these results provide information on the ability of the built-in electronics to
control cell and tissue function. In addition to synchronizing cardiac patch
contraction, spatiotemporally controlling tissue activity may also assist in integrating
the patch with the healthy part of the heart, creating a new paradigm for repairing
damaged cardiac conduction systems.Integrating multifunctional electronics with engineered cardiac patches, as described
here, represents a new direction in tissue engineering, where living cells and tissues
interact with electronics to improve tissue function. We have demonstrated that the
microECP technology enables on-line monitoring of the engineered tissue function, and
provides, for the first time, on-demand, remote interference to regulate tissue
performance. This set-up combined multiple electrodes located in the 3D space of the
cardiac patch, designated to record electrical activity of cells. By using a flexible
basis for our device we have shown that data could be gathered from distant locations
that were brought together within the mesh to enable monitoring of tissue activity in a
3D configuration. Collecting data from multiple electrodes will enable to build a more
comprehensive picture of tissue function, and to pinpoint the occurrence, timing and
location of a failure, if and when it arises. Then, according to physiological needs,
the system can control the engineered tissue by providing electrical stimulation, or
affecting the cells or the patch surroundings by releasing soluble biofactors.Future devices will benefit from design features that extend their mechanical stability by using stretchable electronics fabrication techniques39. Additional sensing capabilities such as pH, heat and mechanical stress may be useful as well to provide a more comprehensive report on the condition of the engineered tissue40–42.Looking forward, the technology can be used in the future to notify physicians of a
patient’s health condition and for subsequently remotely triggering regenerative
processes. As cardiac performance will be recorded over time, physicians could follow
heart regeneration in real-time, providing new means for disease management. Moreover,
the ability to integrate a feedback loop into the system will generate self-regulating
cardiac patches, where physician assistance may not even be required.
Methods
Fabrication of microelectronics
Mechanical grade silicon wafers (300 μm thick, University wafers, Boston, MA) were used as a substrate onto which a 20 nm thick nickel relief later was deposited using a VST e-beam evaporator (VST, Petah Tikva, Israel). A layer of SU-8 photoresist (2 μm, 2002, MicroChem Corp. Newton, MA) was deposited by spin-coat over the entire wafer, patterned by photolithography into a mesh structure, and cured (190°C, 35 minutes). Metallization was performed by lift-off. Briefly, the wafer was coated with a layer of AZ-5214E resist (MicroChem Corp., Newton, MA), exposed and developed. A blanket layer of Cr/Au (10/200 nm) metals were sequentially deposited by evaporation. The photoresist was then dissolved in n-methyl pyrrolidone (Avantor, Center Valley, PA) leaving behind defined the gold electrodes and connectors. Subsequently, titanium nitride was deposited in the same manner. A passivation layer of SU-8 (5-20 μm, 3005-3025) was then deposited onto the wafer, defined by photolithography, and cured. The device was then released from the substrate by etching the bottom nickel layer in a solution of 21% nitric acid overnight. The devices were readily collected and rinsed in water prior to use.
Drug release
Controlled release of the biomolecules was performed as previously described20,25 (see Supplementary information).
Nanofiber scaffold fabrication
Nanofibers were fabricated by electrospinning as previously described43. Briefly, 10% gelatin and 10% PCL (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were separately dissolved in 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) overnight at room temperature. The following day, the solutions were mixed in a ratio of 1: 1 and the polymer solution was delivered through a stainless steel 20G capillary at a feeding rate of 0.5 mL/h using a syringe pump (Harvard apparatus, Holliston, MA). A high voltage power supply (Glassman high voltage Inc., High Bridge, NJ) was used to apply a 10 kV potential difference between the capillary tip and the collector, positioned 10 cm beneath the tip. The metallized SU-8 devices were positioned inside a PBS bath covered in tin foil used as a collector. Fibers were deposited on both sides of the devices.
Cardiac cell isolation and seeding
Neonatal Sprague-Dawley rat ventricular cardiomyocytes were isolated and cultured in the microECP using established protocols44 (Supplementary information).
Device operation
A high-resolution microelectrode array recording system (Multichannel Systems, Reutlingen, Germany) was used to characterize the electrophysiological properties of the microECP. Devices were designed to conform to the Multichannel systems multi electrode array ADPT-FM-32 adapter. Data was acquired by connecting the day 4 microECP to a ME64-FAI-MPA-System (Multichannel systems, Germany). Data was visualized using MC Rack software (Multichannel systems, Germany) and acquired at a sample rate of 10 kHz. One hundred nM norepinephrine bitartrate (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to increase cardiomyocyte beating rate.Stimulation was performed using a Multichannel systems ADPT-EcoFlexMEA36-STIM adapter and an STG-4002 stimulus generator (Multichannel systems). Pacing was performed by applying 1-3 V, 50 ms long pulses at 1-2 Hz. Calcium imaging was used to visualize signal propagation.
Calcium imaging
Briefly, calcium transients were evaluated as previously described. Constructs were incubated with 10 μM fluo-4 AM (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) and 0.1% Pluronic F-127 for 45 minutes at 37°C. Constructs were then washed in medium once and imaged using an inverted fluorescent microscope (Nikon Eclipse TI). Videos were acquired with a Hamamatsu Orcaflash 4.0 (Hamamatsu, Japan) at 100 frames/s using NIS element software. Data collected from 10 ROIs, chosen at random, was analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH). Fluorescence was normalized by dividing by the basal cell fluorescence and the first derivative was created for each sample.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis data are presented as means ± SD. Differences between samples were assessed by a Student’s t-test. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software). p < 0.05 was considered significant. n.s. denotes not significant.Other methods can be found in the Supplementary Information.
Authors: Jung Min Lee; Guosong Hong; Dingchang Lin; Thomas G Schuhmann; Andrew T Sullivan; Robert D Viveros; Hong-Gyu Park; Charles M Lieber Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Ron Feiner; Lior Wertheim; Danielle Gazit; Or Kalish; Gal Mishal; Assaf Shapira; Tal Dvir Journal: Small Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: J Li; A D Celiz; J Yang; Q Yang; I Wamala; W Whyte; B R Seo; N V Vasilyev; J J Vlassak; Z Suo; D J Mooney Journal: Science Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Joselle M McCracken; Sheng Xu; Adina Badea; Kyung-In Jang; Zheng Yan; David J Wetzel; Kewang Nan; Qing Lin; Mengdi Han; Mikayla A Anderson; Jung Woo Lee; Zijun Wei; Matt Pharr; Renhan Wang; Jessica Su; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Jonathan V Sweedler; John A Rogers; Ralph G Nuzzo Journal: Adv Biosyst Date: 2017-07-31