| Literature DB >> 34064563 |
J N Bandal1, V A Tile1, R Z Sayyed2, H P Jadhav2, N I Wan Azelee3,4, Subhan Danish5, Rahul Datta6.
Abstract
Amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) enzyme has gained tremendous demand in various industries, including wastewater treatment, bioremediation and nano-biotechnology. This compels the availability of enzyme in greater yields that can be achieved by employing potential amylase-producing cultures and statistical optimization. The use of Plackett-Burman design (PBD) that evaluates various medium components and having two-level factorial designs help to determine the factor and its level to increase the yield of product. In the present work, we are reporting the screening of amylase-producing marine bacterial strain identified as Bacillus sp. H7 by 16S rRNA. The use of two-stage statistical optimization, i.e., PBD and response surface methodology (RSM), using central composite design (CCD) further improved the production of amylase. A 1.31-fold increase in amylase production was evident using a 5.0 L laboratory-scale bioreactor. Statistical optimization gives the exact idea of variables that influence the production of enzymes, and hence, the statistical approach offers the best way to optimize the bioprocess. The high catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of amylase from Bacillus sp. H7 on soluble starch was estimated to be 13.73 mL/s/mg.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus sp. H7; amylase; optimization; production; response surface method
Year: 2021 PMID: 34064563 PMCID: PMC8150710 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26102833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree of Bacillus sp. H7 drawn using the neighbor-joining method.
Influence of various physico-chemical variables on amylase production by Bacillus sp. H7.
| INC | Amylase | pH | Amylase | Temp | Amylase | CS | Amylase | NS | Amylase | INO | Amylase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 56.89 ± 5.3 | 20 | 90.1 ± 5 | Glucose | 144.64 ± 2.1 | Peptone | 132.6 ± 3.2 | 0.50% | 126.53 ± 0.5 |
| 6 | 59.81 ± 7.5 | 5 | 87.53 ± 6.7 | 25 | 109.8 ± 4.3 | Starch | 149.1 ± 2.1 | Casein | 121.24 ± 5.0 | 1.00% | 133.17 ± 0.6 |
| 12 | 87.24 ± 6.6 | 6 | 113.61 ± 0.6 | 30 | 121.24 ± 2.1 | Fructose | 129.81 ± 2.1 | Tryptone | 111.6 ± 9.0 | 1.50% | 140.03 ± 0.7 |
| 18 | 102.89 ± 1.0 | 7 | 128.89 ± 1.0 | 35 | 127.24 ± 2.1 | Sucrose | 121.24 ± 7.5 | Yeast ext. | 152.96 ± 3.2 | 2.00% | 132.6 ± 3.2 |
| 24 | 117.24 ± 2.8 | 8 | 133.53 ± 1.2 | 40 | 122.81 ± 1.7 | Lactose | 109.17 ± 0.6 | Urea | 88.24 ± 7.0 | ||
| 30 | 125.89 ± 1.0 | 9 | 131.53 ± 1.5 | 45 | 112.8 ± 5.5 | Maltose | 127.81 ± 4.0 | NH4NO3 | 75.89 ± 7.5 | ||
| 36 | 130.53 ± 2.0 | 10 | 125.17 ± 1.5 | 50 | 101.24 ± 4.9 | Dextrose | 97.1 ± 4.3 | NH4CL2 | 60.96 ± 4.4 | ||
| 42 | 128.89 ± 2.7 | 11 | 119.23 ± 4.7 | ||||||||
| 48 | 125.53 ± 1.5 | 12 | 111.17 ± 4.0 | ||||||||
| 54 | 120.53 ± 1.5 | 13 | 98.24 ± 5.0 | ||||||||
| 60 | 113.89 ± 4.0 | 14 | 93.83 ± 7.2 | ||||||||
| 66 | 107.53 ± 4.7 | ||||||||||
| 72 | 100.53 ± 8.4 | ||||||||||
| 78 | 98.89 ± 7.0 | ||||||||||
| 84 | 95.17 ± 7.5 | ||||||||||
| 90 | 92.89 ± 6.2 | ||||||||||
| 96 | 90.24 ± 7.5 |
INC—incubation; pH—media pH; NaCL—NaCl concentration (M); Temp—temperature; CS—carbon source; NS—nitrogen source INO—inoculum level.
Figure 2Influence of salt concentration on growth and amylase production in Bacillus sp. H7.
Placket–Burman Design (PBD experimental design for screening and evaluating factors influencing amylase production from Bacillus sp. H7.
| Run | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | Amylase Activity (U/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted | Experimental | |||||||||
| 1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 135.60 | 133.49 ± 1.22 |
| 2 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 122.86 | 121.89 ± 0.48 |
| 3 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 130.90 | 128.60 ± 0.68 |
| 4 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 118.38 | 119.17 ± 0.76 |
| 5 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 127.68 | 128.65 ± 0.79 |
| 6 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 158.06 | 160.36 ± 1.18 |
| 7 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 123.50 | 122.71 ± 0.34 |
| 8 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 154.32 | 156.43 ± 0.77 |
| 9 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 163.41 | 161.30 ± 0.68 |
| 10 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 149.51 | 148.54 ± 1.04 |
| 11 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 149.81 | 150.60 ± 1.53 |
| 12 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 117.53 | 119.82 ± 0.82 |
ANOVA of PBD model for amylase yield (coded units).
| Term | Effect | Coef | SE Coef | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 137.630 | 0.969 | 141.97 | 0.000 | |
| KH2PO4 | −4.563 | −2.281 | 0.969 | −2.35 | 0.100 |
| NaCl | −4.325 | −2.162 | 0.969 | −2.23 | 0.112 |
| (NH4)2SO4 | −1.673 | −0.836 | 0.969 | −0.86 | 0.452 |
| Yeast extract | −5.211 | −2.605 | 0.969 | −2.69 | 0.075 |
| Soluble starch | 19.367 | 9.684 | 0.969 | 9.99 | 0.002 * |
| pH | 12.301 | 6.150 | 0.969 | 6.34 | 0.008 * |
| Inoculum concentration | 4.879 | 2.440 | 0.969 | 2.52 | 0.086 |
| Incubation period | 19.429 | 9.715 | 0.969 | 10.02 | 0.002 * |
* statistically significant at p > 0.05.
Figure 3Pareto chart representing the effects of medium variables on amylase production by Bacillus sp. H7 (p < 0.05).
Experimental data obtained for significant variables obtained from PBD in CCD.
| Run Order | Type | Soluble Starch | pH | Incubation Period | Amylase Activity (U/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coded | Experimental | Coded | Experimental | Coded | Experimental | Predicted | Experimental | ||
| 1 | Factorial | −1 | 0.50 | −1 | 7.00 | −1 | 35.00 | 165.29 | 165.70 ± 0.64 |
| 2 | Factorial | 1 | 1.50 | −1 | 7.00 | −1 | 35.00 | 156.06 | 158.86 ± 0.29 |
| 3 | Factorial | −1 | 0.50 | 1 | 9.00 | −1 | 35.00 | 188.04 | 188.61 ± 0.97 |
| 4 | Factorial | 1 | 1.50 | 1 | 9.00 | −1 | 35.00 | 177.95 | 178.85 ± 1.05 |
| 5 | Factorial | −1 | 0.50 | −1 | 7.00 | 1 | 37.00 | 152.51 | 153.79 ± 0.95 |
| 6 | Factorial | 1 | 1.50 | −1 | 7.00 | 1 | 37.00 | 154.57 | 156.19 ± 0.64 |
| 7 | Factorial | −1 | 0.50 | 1 | 9.00 | 1 | 37.00 | 172.34 | 171.74 ± 1.62 |
| 8 | Factorial | 1 | 1.50 | 1 | 9.00 | 1 | 37.00 | 173.54 | 175.32 ± 0.75 |
| 9 | Axial | −1.68 | 0.16 | 0 | 8.00 | 0 | 36.00 | 194.70 | 194.78 ± 0.88 |
| 10 | Axial | 1.68 | 1.84 | 0 | 8.00 | 0 | 36.00 | 187.95 | 184.79 ± 0.20 |
| 11 | Axial | 0 | 1.00 | −1.68 | 6.32 | 0 | 36.00 | 147.45 | 144.88 ± 0.34 |
| 12 | Axial | 0 | 1.00 | 1.68 | 9.68 | 0 | 36.00 | 182.54 | 182.02 ± 1.51 |
| 13 | Axial | 0 | 1.00 | 0.0 | 8.00 | −1.68 | 34.32 | 158.41 | 156.69 ± 0.69 |
| 14 | Axial | 0 | 1.00 | 0.0 | 8.00 | 1.68 | 37.68 | 143.96 | 142.59 ± 0.99 |
| 15 | Central | 0 | 1.00 | 0.0 | 8.00 | 0.0 | 36.00 | 196.06 | 196.25 ± 1.22 |
| 16 | Central | 0 | 1.00 | 0.0 | 8.00 | 0.0 | 36.00 | 196.06 | 196.62 ± 0.95 |
| 17 | Central | 0 | 1.00 | 0.0 | 8.00 | 0.0 | 36.00 | 196.06 | 195.68 ± 1.02 |
| 18 | Central | 0 | 1.00 | 0.0 | 8.00 | 0.0 | 36.00 | 196.06 | 195.15 ± 0.35 |
| 19 | Central | 0 | 1.00 | 0.0 | 8.00 | 0.0 | 36.00 | 196.06 | 196.53 ± 0.79 |
| 20 | Central | 0 | 1.00 | 0.0 | 8.00 | 0.0 | 36.00 | 196.06 | 196.66 ± 1.09 |
ANOVA of CCD model using RSM of amylase yield in Bacillus sp. H7.
| Source | DF | Coef | SE Coef | Adj SS | Adj MS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 196.060 | 0.821 | 238.89 | 0.000 | ||||
| Model | 9 | 6785.68 | 753.96 | 186.20 | 0.000 | |||
| Soluble starch | 1 | −2.007 | 0.545 | 55.01 | 55.01 | −3.69 | 13.59 | 0.004 |
| pH | 1 | 10.431 | 0.545 | 1485.93 | 1485.93 | 19.16 | 366.97 | 0.000 |
| Incubation period | 1 | −4.298 | 0.545 | 252.30 | 252.30 | −7.89 | 62.31 | 0.000 |
| Soluble starch * soluble starch | 1 | −1.673 | 0.530 | 40.31 | 40.31 | −3.16 | 9.96 | 0.010 |
| pH * pH | 1 | −10.983 | 0.530 | 1738.31 | 1738.31 | −20.72 | 429.29 | 0.000 |
| Incubation period * incubation period | 1 | −15.866 | 0.530 | 3627.72 | 3627.72 | −29.93 | 895.90 | 0.000 |
| Soluble starch * pH | 1 | −0.217 | 0.711 | 0.38 | 0.38 | −0.30 | 0.09 | 0.767 |
| Soluble starch * incubation period | 1 | 2.822 | 0.711 | 63.69 | 63.69 | 3.97 | 15.73 | 0.003 |
| pH * incubation period | 1 | −0.729 | 0.711 | 4.25 | 4.25 | −1.02 | 1.05 | 0.330 |
| Lack-of-Fit | 5 | 38.64 | 7.73 | 20.88 | 0.002 | |||
| Pure error | 5 | 1.85 | 0.37 |
Figure 4Response surface 3D contour plots representing the interaction between variables affecting amylase production (A) soluble starch and pH (B) soluble starch and incubation period (C) incubation period and pH. While the other variable were kept constant and indicated as hold value.
Figure 5Response optimizer plot illustrating the optimum levels of variables for maximum amylase production by Bacillus sp. H7.
Figure 6(A) Profile of amylase activity at different pH and (B) temperature, where optimum pH and temperature is obtained 8 and 40 °C, respectively. (C) Influence of various metal ions on the amylase activity. (D) Lineweaver–Burk plot of initial rate of reaction against the substrate concentration of soluble starch illustrating amylase activity kinetics parameters.
Comparative account of characteristics of amylase of Bacillus sp. H7 and amylase of other Bacillus spp.
| Properties | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Production time (h) | 24 | 42 | 60 | 24 | 32 |
| Enzyme yield (U/mL) | 130.53 | 33.50 | 90 | 61 | 37 |
| Salt (NaCl) tolerance threshold (M) | 6.0 | 00 | 00 | 2.8 | 2.0 |
| pH range | 7.00–10.00 | 7.0–9.00 | 7.00–9.00 | 4.00–12.00 | 7.00–8.50 |
| pH optima | 8.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 9.00 | 8.0 |
| Temperature range (°C) | 30–70 | 40–70 | 60–70 | 30–40 | 40–50 |
| Temperature optima (°C) | 35 | 70 | 60 | 30 | 40 |
| Yield after statistical optimization (U/mL) (fold increase) | 199.90 (1.29) | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Activating metal ions | Mg2+, Ca2+, Fe2+ and K+ | Mg2+, Ba2+, and Al3+ | Mg2+, Ca2+ | Mn2+, Mg2+, Ca2+ | Ca2+ |
| Inhibitory metal ions | Mn2+, Zn2+ and Hg2+ | ND | ND | ND | Mg, Na+ and K+ |
| Km (mg/mL) | 5.1 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.5 | ND |
| Vmax (μM/min/mL) | 116.28 | 96.22 | 98.11 | 103.02 | ND |
| Kcat (per second) | 69.77 | 57.62 | 63.31 | 68.33 | ND |
ND = not determined.
Range of values for the response surface method, CCD.
| Independent Variable | Code | Coded Level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −α | −1 | 0 | +1 | +α | ||
| Soluble starch (%) | E | 0.16 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.84 |
| Media pH | F | 6.32 | 7.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 9.68 |
| Incubation period (h) | H | 34.32 | 35.0 | 36 | 37 | 37.68 |