| Literature DB >> 30647698 |
C P Sreena1, Denoj Sebastian1.
Abstract
The production of cellulase by Bacillus subtilis MU S1, a strain isolated from Eravikulam National Park, was optimized using one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) and statistical methods. Physical parameters like incubation temperature and agitation speed were optimized using OFAT and found to be 40 °C and 150 rpm, respectively, whereas, medium was optimized by statistical tools. Plackett-Burman design (PBD) was employed to screen the significant variables that highly influence cellulase production. The design showed carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), yeast extract, NaCl, pH, MgSO4 and NaNO3 as the most significant components that affect cellulase production. Among these CMC, yeast extract, NaCl and pH showed positive effect whereas MgSO4 and NaNO3 were found to be significant at their lower levels. The optimum levels of the components that positively affect enzyme production were determined using response surface methodology (RSM) based on central composite design (CCD). Three factors namely CMC, yeast extract and NaCl were studied at five levels whilst pH of the medium was kept constant at 7. The optimal levels of the components were CMC (13.46 g/l), yeast extract (8.38 g/l) and NaCl (6.31 g/l) at pH 7. The maximum cellulase activity in optimized medium was 566.66 U/ml which was close to the predicted activity of 541.05 U/ml. Optimization of physical parameters and medium components showed an overall 3.2-fold increase in activity compared to unoptimized condition (179.06 U/ml).Entities:
Keywords: CMCase; Carboxymethyl cellulose; Central composite design; Media optimization; Plackett-Burman design
Year: 2018 PMID: 30647698 PMCID: PMC6296623 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.12.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Genet Eng Biotechnol ISSN: 1687-157X
Medium components and their variables used in Plackett- Burman design.
| Nutrient code | Nutrients (g/l) | Low (−1) | High (+1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | CMC | 2 | 18 |
| B | Yeast extract | 0.5 | 10.5 |
| C | NaCl | 2 | 14 |
| D | (NH4)2SO4 | 0.5 | 2.5 |
| E | KH2PO4 | 0.05 | 2.05 |
| F | K2HPO4 | 0.05 | 0.45 |
| G | MgSO4 | 0.01 | 0.21 |
| H | CaCl2 | 0.005 | 0.405 |
| I | NaNO3 | 0.005 | 0.805 |
| J | pH | 5 | 7 |
Plackett-Burman design generated for ten variables.
| Run | CMC | Yeast extract | NaCl | (NH4)2SO4 | KH2PO4 | K2HPO4 | MgSO4 | CaCl2 | NaNO3 | pH | Cellulase activity (U/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 190.48 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 8.30 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 500.80 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 440.32 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.81 |
| 6 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15.30 |
| 7 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 150.83 |
| 8 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 170.69 |
| 9 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 10.53 |
| 10 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 130.40 |
| 11 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 16.34 |
| 12 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 320.16 |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 300.64 |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 444.50 |
| 15 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 100.40 |
| 16 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 9.86 |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 330.42 |
| 18 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 370.62 |
| 19 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 382.63 |
| 20 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 278.21 |
Experimental range and levels of independent variables used for central composite design.
| Variables | Components | −α | −1 | 0 | +1 | +α |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | CMC | 2 | 5.24 | 10 | 14.76 | 18 |
| B | Yeast extract | 0.5 | 2.53 | 5.5 | 8.47 | 10.5 |
| C | NaCl | 2 | 4.43 | 8 | 11.57 | 14 |
Full factorial central composite design matrix with actual and coded value of variable and the observed and predicted response.
| Run | CMC | Yeast extract | NaCl | Cellulase activity (U/ml) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | Coded | Actual | Coded | Actual | Coded | Observed | Predicted | |
| 1 | 14.76 | +1 | 2.53 | −1 | 4.43 | −1 | 350.26 | 337.44 |
| 2 | 10.00 | 0 | 5.50 | 0 | 2.00 | −α | 492.13 | 486.10 |
| 3 | 5.24 | −1 | 8.47 | +1 | 4.43 | −1 | 324.28 | 341.22 |
| 4 | 5.24 | −1 | 2.53 | −1 | 11.57 | +1 | 268.31 | 257.74 |
| 5 | 10.00 | 0 | 5.50 | 0 | 8.00 | 0 | 479.33 | 463.25 |
| 6 | 14.76 | +1 | 8.47 | +1 | 11.57 | +1 | 506.40 | 514.18 |
| 7 | 14.76 | +1 | 8.47 | +1 | 4.43 | −1 | 536.32 | 549.79 |
| 8 | 14.76 | +1 | 2.53 | −1 | 11.57 | +1 | 232.50 | 218.46 |
| 9 | 2.00 | −α | 5.50 | 0 | 8.00 | 0 | 268.03 | 259.19 |
| 10 | 18.00 | +α | 5.50 | 0 | 8.00 | 0 | 396.63 | 401.46 |
| 11 | 10.00 | 0 | 5.50 | 0 | 8.00 | 0 | 465.26 | 463.25 |
| 12 | 5.24 | −1 | 8.47 | +1 | 11.57 | +1 | 343.48 | 359.24 |
| 13 | 10.00 | 0 | 5.50 | 0 | 8.00 | 0 | 471.32 | 463.25 |
| 14 | 5.24 | −1 | 2.53 | −1 | 4.43 | −1 | 328.06 | 323.08 |
| 15 | 10.00 | 0 | 5.50 | 0 | 8.00 | 0 | 456.53 | 463.25 |
| 16 | 10.00 | 0 | 5.50 | 0 | 14.00 | +α | 399.26 | 401.27 |
| 17 | 10.00 | 0 | 5.50 | 0 | 8.00 | 0 | 434.32 | 463.25 |
| 18 | 10.00 | 0 | 5.50 | 0 | 8.00 | 0 | 472.04 | 463.25 |
| 19 | 10.00 | 0 | 0.50 | −α | 8.00 | 0 | 172.19 | 199.02 |
| 20 | 10.00 | 0 | 10.50 | +α | 8.00 | 0 | 494.06 | 463.21 |
Fig. 1Optimization of physical parameters (a) temperature (b) agitation speed.
Statistical analysis of Plackett-Burman design for ten variables.
| Term | Coef | T-Value | P-Value | Confidence level (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 209.11 | 24.92 | 0.000 | 100 |
| CMC | 57.63 | 6.87 | 0.000 | 100 |
| Yeast extract | 137.76 | 16.42 | 0.000 | 100 |
| NaCl | 34.62 | 4.13 | 0.003 | 99.7 |
| (NH4)2SO4 | −10.60 | −1.26 | 0.238 | 76.2 |
| KH2PO4 | 4.18 | 0.50 | 0.630 | 37.0 |
| K2HPO4 | −4.53 | −0.54 | 0.603 | 39.7 |
| MgSO4 | −30.11 | −3.59 | 0.006 | 99.4 |
| CaCl2 | −17.91 | −2.13 | 0.062 | 93.8 |
| NaNO3 | −26.21 | −3.12 | 0.012 | 98.8 |
| pH | 34.05 | 4.06 | 0.003 | 99.7 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of response surface quadratic model for the production of cellulase by Bacillus subtilis MU S1.
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1.988E+005 | 9 | 22083.76 | 50.29 | <0.0001 | significant |
| A-CMC | 24431.30 | 1 | 24431.30 | 55.63 | <0.0001 | |
| B-Yeast extract | 84252.06 | 1 | 84252.06 | 191.85 | <0.0001 | |
| C-NaCl | 8686.03 | 1 | 8686.03 | 19.78 | 0.0012 | |
| AB | 18873.33 | 1 | 18873.33 | 42.98 | <0.0001 | |
| AC | 1434.60 | 1 | 1434.60 | 3.27 | 0.1008 | |
| BC | 3477.36 | 1 | 3477.36 | 7.92 | 0.0184 | |
| A2 | 31829.57 | 1 | 31829.57 | 72.48 | <0.0001 | |
| B2 | 31449.98 | 1 | 31449.98 | 71.61 | <0.0001 | |
| C2 | 689.26 | 1 | 689.26 | 1.57 | 0.2388 | |
| Residual | 4391.58 | 10 | 439.16 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 3104.57 | 5 | 620.91 | 2.41 | 0.1780 | not significant |
| Pure Error | 1287.02 | 5 | 257.40 | |||
| Cor Total | 2.031E+005 | 19 |
Fig. 2Response surface graph showing interaction effects between concentrations of (a) CMC and yeast extract; (b) NaCl and yeast extract; (c) CMC and NaCl.
Validation of model.
| Run | CMC | Yeast extract | NaCl | Cellulase activity (U/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | 13.46 | 8.38 | 6.31 | 566.62 | 541.05 |
| 2 | 13.17 | 8.32 | 5.15 | 551.23 | 540.81 |
| 3 | 13.98 | 8.45 | 7.72 | 528.54 | 539.21 |
| 4 | 14.02 | 7.55 | 5.23 | 546.08 | 538.71 |
| 5 | 13.26 | 7.58 | 4.92 | 519.78 | 537.46 |
Fig. 3Cellulase production profile and growth curve of strain MU S1 in optimized medium.