Literature DB >> 34056648

Dosimetric impact of rotational setup errors in volumetric modulated arc therapy for postoperative cervical cancer.

Katsutomo Tsujii1,2, Yoshihiro Ueda3, Masaru Isono3, Masayoshi Miyazaki3, Teruki Teshima3, Masahiko Koizumi1.   

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the impact of rotational setup errors on the doses received during postoperative volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for cervical cancer. Overall, 121 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) sets from 20 patients were rigidly registered to reference computed tomography (CT) sets based on bony landmarks. The rotational setup errors (pitch, yaw and roll) were calculated. Then, 121 CT sets involving rotational setup errors were created, and the dose distribution in these CT sets were recalculated. The recalculated dosimetric parameters for the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were compared to the reference values, and the correlation coefficients between the dosimetric parameter differences and rotational setup errors were calculated. Only the pitch setup error was moderately correlated with CTV coverage (r ≥ 0.40) and strongly correlated with V45 for the bladder (r ≥ 0.91) and V40 for the rectum, small bowel and bone marrow (r ≥ 0.91). The maximum dosimetric difference in a single fraction and overall fractions was -1.59% and -0.69% in D98 for the CTV, 11.72% and 5.17% in V45 for the bladder and -8.03% and -4.68% in V40 for the rectum, respectively. In conclusion, rotational setup errors only slightly impact dose coverage during postoperative cervical cancer VMAT. However, the pitch setup error occasionally affected the doses received by the bladder or the rectum in the overall fraction when the error was systematic. Thus, rotational setup errors should be corrected by adjusting six-degree-of-freedom (DOF) couches to reduce dosimetric differences in the OARs.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dosimetric impact; image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT); postoperative cervical cancer; residual rotational setup error; volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34056648      PMCID: PMC8273806          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  35 in total

1.  3-D portal image analysis in clinical practice: an evaluation of 2-D and 3-D analysis techniques as applied to 30 prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  P Remeijer; E Geerlof; L Ploeger; K Gilhuijs; M van Herk; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans. Technical note.

Authors:  I Paddick
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Residual setup errors caused by rotation and non-rigid motion in prone-treated cervical cancer patients after online CBCT image-guidance.

Authors:  Rozilawati Ahmad; Mischa S Hoogeman; Sandra Quint; Jan Willem Mens; Eliana M Vásquez Osorio; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Magnitude and clinical relevance of translational and rotational patient setup errors: a cone-beam CT study.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Juergen Meyer; Dirk Vordermark; Kurt Baier; Juergen Wilbert; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Assessment of organ motion in postoperative endometrial and cervical cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Eleanor E R Harris; Kujtim Latifi; Chad Rusthoven; Ken Javedan; Kenneth Forster
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  A consensus-based guideline defining the clinical target volume for pelvic lymph nodes in external beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Takafumi Toita; Tatsuya Ohno; Yuko Kaneyasu; Takashi Uno; Ryouichi Yoshimura; Takeshi Kodaira; Kazuhisa Furutani; Goro Kasuya; Satoshi Ishikura; Toshiharu Kamura; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Correlation between location of transposed ovary and function in cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Aera Yoon; Yoo-Young Lee; Won Park; Seung Jae Huh; Chel Hun Choi; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  Inter-fraction bladder filling variations and time trends for cervical cancer patients assessed with a portable 3-dimensional ultrasound bladder scanner.

Authors:  Rozilawati Ahmad; Mischa S Hoogeman; Sandra Quint; Jan Willem Mens; Ilse de Pree; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Image-guided patient positioning: if one cannot correct for rotational offsets in external-beam radiotherapy setup, how should rotational offsets be managed?

Authors:  Martin J Murphy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Margin evaluation of translational and rotational set-up errors in intensity modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Guo-Ping Shan; Ji-Ping Liu; Bin-Bing Wang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  Dose Prediction Models Based on Geometric and Plan Optimization Parameter for Adjuvant Radiotherapy Planning Design in Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hui Tang; Yazheng Chen; Jialiang Jiang; Kemin Li; Jing Zeng; Zhenyao Hu; Rutie Yin
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.682

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.