Literature DB >> 16751076

Magnitude and clinical relevance of translational and rotational patient setup errors: a cone-beam CT study.

Matthias Guckenberger1, Juergen Meyer, Dirk Vordermark, Kurt Baier, Juergen Wilbert, Michael Flentje.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish volume imaging using an on-board cone-beam CT (CB-CT) scanner for evaluation of three-dimensional patient setup errors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data from 24 patients were included in this study, and the setup errors using 209 CB-CT studies and 148 electronic portal images were analyzed and compared. The effect of rotational errors alone, translational errors alone, and combined rotational and translational errors on target coverage and sparing of organs at risk was investigated.
RESULTS: Translational setup errors using the CB-CT scanner and an electronic portal imaging device differed <1 mm in 70.7% and <2 mm in 93.2% of the measurements. Rotational errors >2 degrees were recorded in 3.7% of pelvic tumors, 26.4% of thoracic tumors, and 12.4% of head-and-neck tumors; the corresponding maximal rotational errors were 5 degrees , 8 degrees , and 6 degrees . No correlation between the magnitude of translational and rotational setup errors was observed. For patients with elongated target volumes and sharp dose gradients to adjacent organs at risk, both translational and rotational errors resulted in considerably decreased target coverage and highly increased doses to the organs at risk compared with the initial treatment plan.
CONCLUSIONS: The CB-CT scanner has been successfully established for the evaluation of patient setup errors, and its feasibility in day-to-day clinical practice has been demonstrated. Our results have indicated that rotational errors are of clinical significance for selected patients receiving high-precision radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16751076     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  43 in total

1.  Localization accuracy from automatic and semi-automatic rigid registration of locally-advanced lung cancer targets during image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Scott P Robertson; Elisabeth Weiss; Geoffrey D Hugo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dosimetric effects of roll rotational setup errors on lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Jaegi Lee; Jung-In Kim; Sung-Joon Ye; Hak Jae Kim; Joel Carlson; Jong Min Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Metal artifact correction for x-ray computed tomography using kV and selective MV imaging.

Authors:  Meng Wu; Andreas Keil; Dragos Constantin; Josh Star-Lack; Lei Zhu; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Evaluation of Elekta 4D cone beam CT-based automatic image registration for radiation treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  Jun Li; Amy Harrison; Yan Yu; Ying Xiao; Maria Werner-Wasik; Bo Lu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Multi-system verification of registrations for image-guided radiotherapy in clinical trials.

Authors:  Yunfeng Cui; James M Galvin; William L Straube; Walter R Bosch; James A Purdy; X Allen Li; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Setup uncertainties and PTV margins at different anatomical levels in intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Milan Anjanappa; Malu Rafi; Saju Bhasi; Rejnish Kumar; Kainickal Cessal Thommachan; Tapesh Bhattacharya; Kunnambath Ramadas
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-08-08

7.  A survey of image-guided radiation therapy use in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel R Simpson; Joshua D Lawson; Sameer K Nath; Brent S Rose; Arno J Mundt; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Bone marrow sparing in intensity modulated proton therapy for cervical cancer: Efficacy and robustness under range and setup uncertainties.

Authors:  Eric Dinges; Nicole Felderman; Sarah McGuire; Brandie Gross; Sudershan Bhatia; Sarah Mott; John Buatti; Dongxu Wang
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Accurate positioning for head and neck cancer patients using 2D and 3D image guidance.

Authors:  Hyejoo Kang; Dale M Lovelock; Ellen D Yorke; Sergey Kriminski; Nancy Lee; Howard I Amols
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Method comparison of automated matching software-assisted cone-beam CT and stereoscopic kilovoltage x-ray positional verification image-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Todd J Scarbrough; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Coen R N Rasch; Mehee Choi; Joe Y Ting; Samuel J Wang; Niko Papanikolaou; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.