Literature DB >> 17654888

Image-guided patient positioning: if one cannot correct for rotational offsets in external-beam radiotherapy setup, how should rotational offsets be managed?

Martin J Murphy1.   

Abstract

When setting up patients via image-guided positioning for external-beam radiotherapy, one can often determine the rotational corrections needed for optimal alignment, but once measured, they are not always applied. However, in rigid-body setup calculations the optimal translational component of the setup correction will be different depending on whether rotations are included or excluded from the correction procedure. Furthermore, if rotations go uncorrected then the optimal translation becomes dependent on the relative locations of the registration landmarks, the treatment site, and the rotational axes. If one is not going to make rotational adjustments to the patient position, then two guidelines should be followed: (1) the registration landmarks should closely demarcate the treatment site, and (2) rotational degrees of freedom should not be included in the calculation of setup adjustments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17654888     DOI: 10.1118/1.2731485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Prostate intrafraction motion assessed by simultaneous kilovoltage fluoroscopy at megavoltage delivery I: clinical observations and pattern analysis.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A DUAL QUATERNION BASED METHOD FOR ESTIMATING MARGINS FOR PLANNING TARGET VOLUMES IN RADIOTHERAPY.

Authors:  Q J Ge; Zihan Yu; Mark Langer
Journal:  Proc ASME Des Eng Tech Conf       Date:  2020-11-03

3.  Influence of rotations on dose distributions in spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Authors:  Orit Gutfeld; Annette E Kretzler; Rojano Kashani; Daniel Tatro; James M Balter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Evaluation of inter-fraction and intra-fraction errors during volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Wen-Jing Yin; Ying Sun; Feng Chi; Jian-Lan Fang; Rui Guo; Xiao-Li Yu; Yan-Ping Mao; Zhen-Yu Qi; Ying Guo; Meng-Zhong Liu; Jun Ma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and IMRT.

Authors:  Alexandra D Jensen; Marcus Winter; Sabine P Kuhn; Jürgen Debus; Olaf Nairz; Marc W Münter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Dosimetric impact of rotational setup errors in volumetric modulated arc therapy for postoperative cervical cancer.

Authors:  Katsutomo Tsujii; Yoshihiro Ueda; Masaru Isono; Masayoshi Miyazaki; Teruki Teshima; Masahiko Koizumi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Dosimetric consequences of rotational setup errors with direct simulation in a treatment planning system for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jean L Peng; Chihray Liu; Yu Chen; Robert J Amdur; Kenneth Vanek; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Comparisons of multiple automated anatomy-based image-guidance methods for patient setup before head/neck external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nesrin Dogan; Shiyu Song; Habeeb Saleh; Jian Wu; Martin J Murphy
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Adaptive optimization by 6 DOF robotic couch in prostate volumetric IMRT treatment: rototranslational shift and dosimetric consequences.

Authors:  Silvia Chiesa; Lorenzo Placidi; Luigi Azario; Gian Carlo Mattiucci; Francesca Greco; Andrea Damiani; Giovanna Mantini; Vincenzo Frascino; Angelo Piermattei; Vincenzo Valentini; Mario Balducci
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Comparison of automatic image registration uncertainty for three IGRT systems using a male pelvis phantom.

Authors:  Jeffrey Barber; Jonathan R Sykes; Lois Holloway; David I Thwaites
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.