Literature DB >> 34056187

Two-Step Growth of Uniform Monolayer MoS2 Nanosheets by Metal-Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition.

Sayema Chowdhury1, Anupam Roy1, Chison Liu1, Md Hasibul Alam1, Rudresh Ghosh1, Harry Chou1, Deji Akinwande1, Sanjay K Banerjee1.   

Abstract

To achieve large area growth of transition metal dichalcogenides of uniform monolayer thickness, we demonstrate metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) growth under low pressure followed by a high-temperature sulfurization process under atmospheric pressure (AP). Following sulfurization, the MOCVD-grown continuous MoS2 film transforms into compact triangular crystals of uniform monolayer thickness as confirmed from the sharp distinct photoluminescence peak at 1.8 eV. Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies confirm that the structural disorders and chalcogen vacancies inherent to the as-grown MOCVD film are substantially healed and carbon/oxygen contaminations are heavily suppressed. The as-grown MOCVD film has a Mo/S ratio of 1:1.6 and an average defect length of ∼1.56 nm, which improve to 1:1.97 and ∼21 nm, respectively, upon sulfurization. The effect of temperature and duration of the sulfurization process on the morphology and stoichiometry of the grown film is investigated in detail. Compared to the APCVD growth, this two-step growth process shows more homogenous distribution of the triangular monolayer MoS2 domains across the entire substrate, while demonstrating comparable electrical performance.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34056187      PMCID: PMC8153749          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), belonging to a special family of 2D-layered materials called transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), is one of the most thoroughly investigated material due to its unique thickness-dependent electronic and optical properties.[1] When thinned down to a monolayer, it develops a direct band gap which makes it suitable for applications such as low-power field-effect transistors (FETs),[2] optoelectronics,[3,4] and flexible electronics.[5] In addition, MoS2 has successfully shown applications in other fields such as memory,[6] gas sensors,[7] logic circuits,[8] spintronics,[9] valleytronics,[10] and so forth. With such a promise as an emerging candidate for next-generation electronics, it is imperative to have a repeatable, reliable, scalable, and cost-effective synthesis method for uniform large-scale monolayer MoS2. Among various bottom-up synthesis processes, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) has been widely used in growing large area crystalline films with properties comparable to flakes exfoliated mechanically from bulk.[11−13] CVD growth of MoS2 is realized by different approaches, the most common one being the molybdenum oxide (MoO3) solid precursor-based CVD under atmospheric pressure (APCVD).[14−17] Although full wafer scale growth with grain size as large as hundreds of micrometers can be achieved using the CVD method,[11,18] the process suffers severely from several limitations such as overall thickness control, uniformity of grain size/coverage, and repeatability.[19,20] Since the powder-based MoO3 precursor has a low vapor pressure, it must be placed in the central heating zone of the furnace which compromises precise control over the ratio of precursor flux, leading to nonuniform thicknesses and inhomogeneity in domain sizes.[21] To combat these issues, the use of metal organic precursors having high vapor pressure is being investigated.[22] Metal organic CVD (MOCVD) offers more efficient control over the metal flux, and thus, the ratio of metal to chalcogen flux that reaches the substrate can be tailored as required, thereby ensuring uniform thickness control. Several reports have demonstrated MOCVD growth of MoS2 using precursors such as molyhexacarbonyl [Mo(CO)6] for metal and diethyl sulfide [(C2H5)2S] for chalcogen.[23−25] Diethyl sulfide inherently leaves considerable carbon residues on the film that degrades material properties.[26] Other routes involve creating an air- and moisture-stable precursor tetrakis(diethylaminodithiocarbomato) molybdate(IV) (Mo(Et2NCS2)4) first and then decomposing this single source to form MoS2 via MOCVD.[27] Regardless of the precursors used, the growth often results in a polycrystalline film with domain sizes in the order of nanometers.[25,28,29] Recently, MOCVD growths of MoS2 with domain sizes larger than 10 μm have been reported. However, they involve long processing times (∼26 h per monolayer)[23] or require the substrates to be pre-exposed to halides,[25,30] which form the sodium/potassium metal oxide layer below the TMD monolayer, as a byproduct.[31] So far, an optimized MOCVD method that yields large-area single-crystal monolayer domains with uniform coverage across the entire substrate and free of contamination, for example, carbon and/or alkali metal oxides, is yet to be developed. In this work, we report large-area MOCVD growth of the MoS2 film that transforms into homogeneous distribution of single-crystal triangular domains of monolayer thickness by its controlled sulfurization. Several characterization techniques, for example, Raman and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopies, optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), are used to determine the crystalline quality, surface morphology, stoichiometry, and contamination level upon sulfurization of the grown films. Following sulfurization, MOCVD-grown MoS2 monolayer domains also show electrical properties that are comparable to those grown by the APCVD method.

Experimental Methods

Material Synthesis

MOCVD Growth of MoS2

Large-area MoS2 was synthesized in an MOCVD growth system under low-pressure conditions [Figure a]. The system consists of a quartz tube with an inner diameter of 22 mm (outer diameter = 25 mm) inside a single zone Lindberg/Blue M furnace. The precursors used for MoS2 growth are molybdenum hexacarbonyl, Mo(CO)6 (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number 13939-06-05, 99.9%), and diethyl sulfide, (C2H5)2S (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number 352-93-2, 98%). The target substrate used in this work was 285 nm SiO2 grown on highly doped double-side-polished p-type Si. At the start of the growth process, the target substrate (measuring 10 cm × 1.7 cm) was placed approximately 10 cm into the furnace and the system was pumped down to base pressure (∼1.5 mTorr) following which three subsequent purge cycles using ultrahigh purity Ar at 100 sccm were performed. Afterward, Ar flow was cut off and H2 flow was introduced at 5 sccm as the carrier gas for the rest of the growth. Background pressure of the system was held at 5 mTorr. Mo(CO)6 and (C2H5)2S precursors were kept in bubblers in APs at 45 °C and at room temperature, respectively, and the flow rates were controlled via needle valves. The growth was conducted at 850 °C for a duration of 1 min after which the precursor gas flow was cut off and the furnace was allowed to cool down, with only the carrier gas flowing.
Figure 1

(a) Schematic of the MOCVD growth system. The Raman spectrum of the MoS2 films (b) before and (c) after sulfurization at 850 °C for 30 min. The inset shows the SEM image of a triangular MoS2 domain following sulfurization.

(a) Schematic of the MOCVD growth system. The Raman spectrum of the MoS2 films (b) before and (c) after sulfurization at 850 °C for 30 min. The inset shows the SEM image of a triangular MoS2 domain following sulfurization.

Postgrowth Sulfurization

In another single-zone Lindberg/Blue M CVD furnace, the MOCVD-grown MoS2 sample was loaded in the center with sulfur powder (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number 7704-34-9, 99.98%) positioned upstream relative to the MoS2 sample and heated separately using a heating coil. The as-grown samples were sulfurized at different temperatures for different durations. The sulfurization procedure was initiated by increasing the temperature of the MoS2 sample to the target temperature. Sulfur was heated to 150 °C, and a carrier gas (N2) was flown in at 10 sccm. After holding the MoS2 film at the target temperature for the desired duration, the furnace heating and the heating coil for sulfur were cut off and subsequently allowed to cool down without any feedback control.

APCVD Growth of MoS2

A clean double-side-polished Si/SiO2 (300 nm, thermally grown oxide) substrate was placed on an alumina combustion boat/crucible containing 8.5 mg of MoO3 (99.5% pure Alfa Aesar, CAS 1313-27-5) and placed inside a 1 in. quartz tube and positioned at the center of a single-zone Lindberg/Blue M furnace.[32] A second boat containing S (99.98% Sigma-Aldrich CAS: 7704-34-9) was placed upstream in the tube outside the central heating zone of the furnace, and a separate coil heater was attached to apply heat to the S boat. The system was pumped down to base pressure (∼1.5 mTorr) and purged three times using ultrahigh pure N2 at 200 sccm. The growth was conducted at 850 °C (with S kept at 150 °C) for 5 min under ambient pressure with a carrier gas (N2) flow rate at 10 sccm. The furnace was then turned off, and the lid was opened to let the furnace cool down under ambient conditions.

Material Characterization

A Veeco tapping-mode AFM instrument was used to image the grown MoS2. Raman and PL spectroscopies were performed on all the samples before and after sulfurization using a Renishaw inVia Raman spectrophotometer system, coupled with 532 nm green laser. Raman and PL spectra were collected using a grating with 3000 lines/mm and 1200 lines/mm, respectively. XPS spectra were recorded using a commercial X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Kratos Axis Ultra), utilizing a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (hυ = 1486.5 eV), electrostatic lens optics, and a multichannel plate and delay line detector coupled to a hemispherical analyzer. The photoelectron takeoff angle was normal to the surface of the sample and 45° with respect to the X-ray beam. High-resolution spectra were collected with a pass energy of 20 eV. The pressure in the XPS chamber was typically 2 × 10–9 Torr during data acquisition.

Device Fabrication and Measurement

Uniform monolayer MoS2 domains on Si/SiO2 substrates were identified using a combination of optical contrast, Raman spectroscopy, and AFM. Device active regions and source/drain metal electrodes were defined with electron beam lithography. A stack of Ni/Au (20 nm/30 nm) was deposited as source/drain metal electrodes using an e-beam evaporator. All electrical DC measurements were performed on a Cascade Microtech Summit 11000B-AP probe station using an Agilent 4156C parameter analyzer in ambient at room temperature under dark.

Results and Discussions

The experimental setup used for MOCVD growth of MoS2 is schematically shown in Figure a. Gas-phase metal–organic precursors molybdenum hexacarbonyl Mo(CO)6 and diethyl sulfide (C2H5)2S are used to grow a thin film of MoS2 under low pressure (∼1.5 mTorr). Growth at 850 °C for 1 min duration results in complete coverage of the Si/SiO2 substrate with a continuous film, as shown in the AFM image [Figure S1]. Raman spectroscopic measurements show two distinct peaks at ∼386 and ∼406 cm–1, which coincide with the Mo–S phonon modes E2g1 (in-plane) and A1g (out-of-plane) peaks of MoS2, respectively, as found in the literature[33] [Figure b]. However, the asymmetry in the E2g1 peak suggests the presence of defect-activated peaks and/or peaks due to intermediate oxides that are formed during growth.[34] In CVD-grown MoS2, sulfur vacancies are one of the most common defects[35,36] which results in unsaturated chemical bond formation between Mo atoms. These bonds can interact with neighboring S atoms and disturb the crystal symmetry which activates phonon modes otherwise unavailable in pristine MoS2. The peak at ∼229 cm–1, referred to as LA(M), possibly originates from the presence of a local maximum in the vibrational density of states located at the energy corresponding to the longitudinal acoustic (LA) branch at the edge of the Brillouin zone.[37] Other prominent defect-induced peaks that arise at ∼359, ∼180, and ∼187 cm–1 are assigned to the TO(M), ZA(M), and TA(K) modes, respectively.[38] In addition, linewidths of the first-order Raman peaks are wider than those obtained for monolayer MoS2 exfoliated from bulk [Figure S2], thereby corroborating the presence of structural disorders in the grown film.[39] These vacancies and disorders can be “repaired” to a great extent by annealing post growth in a S-rich environment. Upon sulfurization at 850 °C under AP for 30 min (more details in the Material Synthesis section), the as-grown film transforms into isolated monolayer triangular domains, as seen in the inset of Figure c. During the sulfurization process at high temperature, the carbon impurities from the organic precursors and oxide-based intermediate compounds can be desorbed from the MOCVD-grown film. The incoming S adatoms can react with these unpassivated Mo sites, as well as with the desorbed intermediate compounds in the gas phase, leading to MoS2 triangular domains. Figure c shows the Raman spectrum of the MOCVD-grown MoS2 film after sulfurization. Most of the defect-induced peaks present in the as-grown sample disappear following sulfurization and the first-order peak intensities and linewidths are greatly improved [Figure S3], indicating reduction in defect density and improvement in crystalline quality. An additional peak at ∼450 cm–1 now appears after sulfurization due to fewer defects and is attributed to an overlap of two peaks: the second order of the LA mode at the M-point called the 2LA(M) peak and a first-order optical phonon peak A2u.[38,40] More detailed Raman spectroscopic analyses for sulfurization at different temperatures and durations are discussed in the later subsections. To compare our two-step growth process with that of other widely used methods, we have conducted growth of MoS2 via the solid-precursor-based (MoO3 and S powder) APCVD method. Figure a shows an optical micrograph of MoS2 grown on the Si/SiO2 substrate. Compact MoS2 domains as large as 40–50 μm are primarily triangular or hexagonal in shape [as shown in the optical and SEM images in Figure b,c, respectively]. Figure d,e shows Raman and PL spectroscopies of a typical monolayer domain grown by APCVD. The Raman peak difference of ∼19 cm–1 and a sharp distinct PL peak at 1.86 eV [full width at half-maximum (fwhm) is ∼0.06 eV] are consistent with those of monolayer MoS2.[33] While this method produces MoS2 with quality comparable to exfoliated flakes, a large portion of the substrate is rendered unusable due to very thick deposits of MoS2, MoO3, and intermediate compounds. The experimental setup used for APCVD growth of MoS2 involves placing the substrate face-down on top of a crucible containing MoO3 powder. Since MoO3 is a low-vapor-pressure solid, it needs to be placed at the center of the heating zone at 850 °C, and hence, the metal precursor flux cannot be precisely controlled. This setup causes majority of the MoO3 powder to evaporate and/or react with S powder either partially or completely depending on local Mo/S ratios. In addition to MoS2 with varying thicknesses, the unreacted and partially reacted MoO3 also deposit on the central region of the substrate, and monolayer MoS2 is formed only in the faint blue region along its periphery [Figure a]. Figure f shows SEM images from six different points marked on different locations in Figure a (color-coded), showing the variation in domain shapes, sizes, distribution, and thicknesses. Domain sizes range from 5 to 100 μm, from the monolayer to bulk in thickness, and the nucleation density decreases as we move downstream. Sharp gradient of concentration of domains across the sample is clearly seen in Figure f where the domain density decreases as we move further away from the MoO3 source, indicating a nonhomogeneous coverage. These differences in local Mo/S ratios also give rise to different morphologies, triangles and hexagons, as shown in the inset of Figure f.
Figure 2

APCVD growth of MoS2: (a) optical image of the Si/SiO2 substrate after APCVD growth of MoS2. (b) Optical and (c) SEM images of triangular MoS2 domains. Scale bars are 10 μm. Corresponding Raman and PL spectra are shown in (d,e), respectively. (f) Variation of MoS2 domain size, shape, nucleation density, and thickness in different locations of the sample [color-coded accordingly in (a)]. Scale bars for all the images are 100 μm. Insets show magnified images (scale bars are 25 μm) of one of the domains to signify the domain shape. MOCVD growth of MoS2: (g) optical image of the Si/SiO2 substrate after MOCVD growth of MoS2 followed by sulfurization. (h) Optical and (i) SEM images and the corresponding (j) Raman and (k) PL spectra of triangular MOCVD MoS2 domains. Scale bars are 20 μm for (h) and 10 μm for (i). (l) Uniformity of MoS2 domain size, shape, nucleation density, and thickness in different locations of the sample [color-coded accordingly in (g)]. Scale bars are 100 μm.

APCVD growth of MoS2: (a) optical image of the Si/SiO2 substrate after APCVD growth of MoS2. (b) Optical and (c) SEM images of triangular MoS2 domains. Scale bars are 10 μm. Corresponding Raman and PL spectra are shown in (d,e), respectively. (f) Variation of MoS2 domain size, shape, nucleation density, and thickness in different locations of the sample [color-coded accordingly in (a)]. Scale bars for all the images are 100 μm. Insets show magnified images (scale bars are 25 μm) of one of the domains to signify the domain shape. MOCVD growth of MoS2: (g) optical image of the Si/SiO2 substrate after MOCVD growth of MoS2 followed by sulfurization. (h) Optical and (i) SEM images and the corresponding (j) Raman and (k) PL spectra of triangular MOCVD MoS2 domains. Scale bars are 20 μm for (h) and 10 μm for (i). (l) Uniformity of MoS2 domain size, shape, nucleation density, and thickness in different locations of the sample [color-coded accordingly in (g)]. Scale bars are 100 μm. Figure g shows an optical micrograph of MoS2 grown on the Si/SiO2 substrate via the two-step MOCVD method. Unlike solid-precursor-based APCVD growth, MOCVD uses gas-phase precursors, which results in more uniform film coverage across the substrate. Following the postgrowth sulfurization process at 850 °C for 30 min, mostly isolated triangular MoS2 domains of ∼30 μm in size are formed [as shown in the optical and SEM images in Figure h,i, respectively], with a few occurrences of the domains merging to form different types of grain boundaries [as shown in Figure S4], as also observed in MoS2 grown by the APCVD method.[41−43] Raman [Figure j] and PL [Figure k] spectroscopies closely match with that of APCVD-grown MoS2 and the reported literature.[41] A slight shift in PL peak position in the case of MOCVD sulfurized domains may be attributed to the strain associated with the high-temperature annealing process. This strain is relaxed upon transfer of the film from the growth substrate.[41] SEM images taken from six different spots of the MOCVD film following sulfurization [as marked in Figure g] are shown in Figure l. Raman spectra from different spots across different MoS2 domains are shown in Figure S5 which does not show any significant variation. These observations confirm that unlike APCVD, this method produces triangular monolayer domains distributed homogeneously across the entire substrate. To study the effect of annealing conditions, several identical MoS2 samples grown by MOCVD were annealed at different temperatures/durations in a S-rich environment. Figure a shows the comparison among normalized Raman spectra of the grown film sulfurized for 30 min at different temperatures: 550, 650, 750, and 850 °C. With the increase in the sulfurization temperature, the distortion in the E2g1 peak which usually arises from the presence of oxide-based intermediate compounds and defects in the MoS2 film gradually transforms into a sharp distinct peak, as expected for pristine single-crystal MoS2. This improvement in crystalline quality is further confirmed from the enhanced peak intensities and reduced linewidths of the first-order Raman peaks. Figure b shows variation in peak intensities and the fwhm with increased sulfurization temperature for the A1g Raman peak. As the sulfurization temperature increases, linewidth of the A1g peak decreases from 6.02 to 4.55 cm–1 which indicates gradual reduction in structural disorder[44] [Figure b]. A similar trend in Raman E2g1 linewidth with sulfurization temperature is shown in Figure S6. The improvement in crystalline quality is also evident from the enhanced PL peak intensities[45] and narrow PL peak width for the sample sulfurized at 850 °C for 30 min, signifying the direct band gap for monolayer MoS2 at 1.8 eV, as shown in Figure c. Transformation of the continuous MOCVD-grown MoS2 film into monolayer domains upon sulfurization at various temperatures is shown in Figure S7. Further increase in the sulfurization temperature, however, produces noncompact sparsely populated thicker MoS2, as shown in Figure S8.
Figure 3

Comparison of Raman and PL spectra of the as-grown MOCVD film following sulfurization at different temperatures and durations. All Raman data have been normalized with respect to Si. (a) Comparison of Raman spectra for the samples sulfurized at different temperatures: 550, 650, 750, and 850 °C. The sulfurization duration was kept 30 min for all the samples. (b) Variation of A1g fwhm and normalized A1g peak intensity with respect to sulfurization temperature. (c) PL spectra for different samples sulfurized at different temperatures. (d) Comparison of the MoS2 Raman peaks as a function of sulfurization duration: as-grown and 5 and 30 min. Sulfurization temperature was kept at 850 °C for all the samples. (e) Variation of A1g fwhm and normalized peak intensity with respect to sulfurization duration. Corresponding variation in PL spectra is shown in (f).

Comparison of Raman and PL spectra of the as-grown MOCVD film following sulfurization at different temperatures and durations. All Raman data have been normalized with respect to Si. (a) Comparison of Raman spectra for the samples sulfurized at different temperatures: 550, 650, 750, and 850 °C. The sulfurization duration was kept 30 min for all the samples. (b) Variation of A1g fwhm and normalized A1g peak intensity with respect to sulfurization temperature. (c) PL spectra for different samples sulfurized at different temperatures. (d) Comparison of the MoS2 Raman peaks as a function of sulfurization duration: as-grown and 5 and 30 min. Sulfurization temperature was kept at 850 °C for all the samples. (e) Variation of A1g fwhm and normalized peak intensity with respect to sulfurization duration. Corresponding variation in PL spectra is shown in (f). Figure d–f shows the Raman and PL spectra of the as-grown MOCVD films compared to samples that were sulfurized at 850 °C for 5 and 30 min. Although optically no significant difference is observed for the duration of 5 min sulfurization, monolayer triangular MoS2 domains appear after 30 min and are distributed uniformly across the substrate (Figure S9). The A1g peak intensity and fwhm also improve accordingly, as shown in Figure e. The corresponding PL spectra and gradual improvements in the fwhm are compared in Figures f and S10, respectively. Using diethyl sulfide as the chalcogen precursor in MOCVD growth leaves significant carbon residues in the grown film.[23] The Raman spectrum from the as-grown film in Figure (black line) shows the presence of peaks at the defect-related D-band at ∼1347 cm–1 and the graphite-related G band at ∼1597 cm–1,[46] confirming the presence of carbonaceous compounds. Similar observation has also been made by Choudhury et al.[47] and also by Zhang et al.,[48] where the presence of the carbon G peak is observed for the films grown at different temperatures. These peaks disappear completely following sulfurization [Figure , blue line], indicating significant reduction in carbon contamination.
Figure 4

Raman spectra from the MOCVD-grown MoS2 sample showing a prominent graphite-oxide peak (black line) arising from carbon impurities which are suppressed in the sample following sulfurization (blue line).

Raman spectra from the MOCVD-grown MoS2 sample showing a prominent graphite-oxide peak (black line) arising from carbon impurities which are suppressed in the sample following sulfurization (blue line). To further check the film quality and to confirm the presence of oxide and carbon contamination, elemental analysis and chemical stoichiometry quantification were investigated using XPS. Survey spectra from the as-grown and the sulfurized films are shown in the Supporting Information [Figure S11], and all the major peaks are identified. Figure shows high-resolution spectra for Mo-3d, S-2p, and C-1s peaks from the as-grown MOCVD film [Figure a] and from samples sulfurized under the optimized conditions [Figure b]. The Mo-3d spectra show the clear presence of molybdenum oxide at 236.5 eV on the as-grown film that almost vanishes after sulfurization, indicating conversion of the remaining oxides to MoS2.[49] In addition to this, MOCVD film quality suffers greatly due to significant carbon contamination arising from organic precursors such as diethyl sulfide, as mentioned previously [Figure ]. C-1s spectra from the as-grown film [Figure a] can be resolved into the following components: CC at 284.8 eV, C–O at 286.6 eV, and C=O at 288.8 eV. Upon sulfurization at 850 °C for 30 min, most of the carbon contamination is reduced as seen from a sharp decline in the peak intensity of C-1s spectra in Figure b. Some carbon, however, is still present as is the case with all materials that have been exposed to the ambient. The stoichiometry as calculated from the integrated peak areas of Mo and S is found to be Mo/S = 1:1.6 for the as-grown film. This means that about 20% of the sulfur sites are vacancies. If we assume a uniform distribution of the sulfur vacancies, one in every five S-sites has S missing. Considering the distance between adjacent S-sites to be 0.316 nm, the average distance of defects, LD, is found to be ∼1.58 nm. Upon sulfurization, the stoichiometry improves to almost a near ideal value of 1:1.97 which corresponds to an average interdefect distance of ∼21.06 nm. This is a ∼13-fold increase in the average interdefect distance, and it clearly shows the significant improvement in the film quality upon sulfurization. Figure S12 shows the improvement in stoichiometry of MoS2 with increasing sulfurization temperatures. This agrees well with the Raman spectroscopic analyses in Figure where sulfurization helps mitigate the defect-activated Raman modes. In addition, as the defect density decreases, first-order Raman peaks undergo slight shifts, which may arise due to phonon confinement, as seen previously in the case of graphene and other disordered crystals.[38] To demonstrate the gradual improvement in the film quality with increasing sulfurization temperature/durations, Figure shows the high-resolution XPS analyses for the samples sulfurized under different conditions. Annealing for 30 min at different temperatures in a S environment and for different durations at 850 °C is shown in Figure a,b and 6c,d, respectively. The ratio of MoO3 to MoS2 and the carbon peak intensity gradually decrease with increasing sulfurization temperature [Figures b and S13] and duration [Figure d], signifying a substantial reduction in defects and oxide/carbon contaminations.
Figure 5

High-resolution XPS spectra from MoS2 films compared before and after sulfurization: Mo-3d, S-2p, and C-1s peaks from (a) the as-grown and (b) after sulfurization at 850 °C for 30 min.

Figure 6

(a,b) Comparison of XPS spectra of MoS2 films sulfurized at different temperatures: (a) high-resolution C-1s, Mo-3d, and S-2p peaks and the (b) corresponding variation of C-1s peak intensities and normalized MoO3/MoS2 peak ratios. (c,d) Comparison of XPS spectra of MoS2 sulfurized for different durations: (c) high-resolution C-1s, Mo-3d, and S-2p peaks and the (d) corresponding variation of C-1s peak intensities and normalized MoO3/MoS2 peak ratios.

High-resolution XPS spectra from MoS2 films compared before and after sulfurization: Mo-3d, S-2p, and C-1s peaks from (a) the as-grown and (b) after sulfurization at 850 °C for 30 min. (a,b) Comparison of XPS spectra of MoS2 films sulfurized at different temperatures: (a) high-resolution C-1s, Mo-3d, and S-2p peaks and the (b) corresponding variation of C-1s peak intensities and normalized MoO3/MoS2 peak ratios. (c,d) Comparison of XPS spectra of MoS2 sulfurized for different durations: (c) high-resolution C-1s, Mo-3d, and S-2p peaks and the (d) corresponding variation of C-1s peak intensities and normalized MoO3/MoS2 peak ratios. To test the electrical quality of the film following sulfurization, back-gated FETs were fabricated on transferred MoS2. Electrical properties of the as-grown film (Figure S14) show no modulation that could arise due to the presence of defects in the as-grown film.[50] The sulfurized film was transferred via a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-based wet transfer method using NaOH as the substrate etchant onto the target Si/SiO2 substrate with alignment mark. Figure a shows PL spectra of a MoS2 domain before and after transfer. Shift in the PL peak position upon transfer indicates relaxation of strain that develops during the high-temperature growth and annealing cycles.[41] Suitable MoS2 domains were identified using a combination of optical contrast, Raman spectroscopy, and AFM images. Next, drain/source metal contacts were patterned using e-beam lithography and, subsequently, contact metals (Ni/Au 20 nm/30 nm) were deposited using e-beam evaporation followed by liftoff. An optical image of the final device structure used is shown in the inset of Figure b. Electrical measurements were performed under ambient at room temperature without any illumination. Figure b shows the IDS–VGS transfer characteristics of a SiO2/Si back-gated MoS2 transistor with 285 nm-thick SiO2 being the back-gate dielectric. The back-gate voltage (VBG) is swept from −30 to 60 V at a drain voltage of 2 V. The device exhibits a threshold voltage (Vth) of around −10 V. The ON/OFF ratios exceed 106 at a VDS of 2 V with off-state currents less than 1 pA. Using the slope of the IDS–VGS curve in the linear region, the field-effect mobility is calculated using where L, W, and Cox are the channel length, width, and dielectric capacitance, respectively. Using a value of Cox = 12 nF/cm2 (for 285 nm-thick SiO2) and L = 500 nm, we obtain a field-effect mobility value of ∼1 cm2/(V s), which is comparable to reported values for CVD MoS2 FETs on thermally grown SiO2.[51−53]Figure c shows the IDS–VDS output curves for back-gate voltages of 20 V to 60 V with an interval of 10 V. From the exponential IDS–VDS at small VDS, it is evident that a Schottky contact is formed, typical for SiO2/Si back-gated MoS2 FETs.[54]
Figure 7

(a) Comparison of PL spectra of the sulfurized MoS2 domain before and after a PMMA-based wet transfer. (b) Transfer characteristics for the MoS2-based transistor with a channel length of 500 nm. Optical image of the device is shown in the inset. (c) Output characteristics of the MoS2 transistor in (b).

(a) Comparison of PL spectra of the sulfurized MoS2 domain before and after a PMMA-based wet transfer. (b) Transfer characteristics for the MoS2-based transistor with a channel length of 500 nm. Optical image of the device is shown in the inset. (c) Output characteristics of the MoS2 transistor in (b).

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have grown a continuous MoS2 film via MOCVD and demonstrated its controlled sulfurization to form single-crystal domains with uniform monolayer thickness. The effect of sulfurization temperature and duration is investigated, and an optimized condition is proposed to obtain a homogeneous distribution of large-area single-crystal monolayer domains. The sulfurization process heals sulfur vacancies in the as-grown film, thereby improving the stoichiometry of MoS2, as verified by XPS quantification. Interestingly, carbon contamination, one of the main challenges associated with metal organic precursors, is highly suppressed following sulfurization, as evident from both Raman and XPS analyses. Monolayer nature, high crystallinity, and uniformity of MoS2 domains are confirmed via Raman and PL spectroscopies. Electrical characterization of MoS2 following sulfurization shows performance comparable to that grown by the APCVD method. Our results indicate that this two-step growth method can be considered as a reliable and efficient way to synthesize large-area single-crystal homogeneous domains of MoS2 with uniform monolayer coverage and can also be applied to other sulfur-based TMDs.
  29 in total

1.  Evolution of interlayer coupling in twisted molybdenum disulfide bilayers.

Authors:  Kaihui Liu; Liming Zhang; Ting Cao; Chenhao Jin; Diana Qiu; Qin Zhou; Alex Zettl; Peidong Yang; Steve G Louie; Feng Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Wafer-scale production of highly uniform two-dimensional MoS2 by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition.

Authors:  TaeWan Kim; Jihun Mun; Hyeji Park; DaeHwa Joung; Mangesh Diware; Chegal Won; Jonghoo Park; Soo-Hwan Jeong; Sang-Woo Kang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.874

3.  Wafer-Scale, Homogeneous MoS2 Layers on Plastic Substrates for Flexible Visible-Light Photodetectors.

Authors:  Yi Rang Lim; Wooseok Song; Jin Kyu Han; Young Bum Lee; Sung Jun Kim; Sung Myung; Sun Sook Lee; Ki-Seok An; Chel-Jong Choi; Jongsun Lim
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Atomristor: Nonvolatile Resistance Switching in Atomic Sheets of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides.

Authors:  Ruijing Ge; Xiaohan Wu; Myungsoo Kim; Jianping Shi; Sushant Sonde; Li Tao; Yanfeng Zhang; Jack C Lee; Deji Akinwande
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Layer-controlled CVD growth of large-area two-dimensional MoS2 films.

Authors:  Jaeho Jeon; Sung Kyu Jang; Su Min Jeon; Gwangwe Yoo; Yun Hee Jang; Jin-Hong Park; Sungjoo Lee
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 7.790

6.  Synthesis of large-area MoS2 atomic layers with chemical vapor deposition.

Authors:  Yi-Hsien Lee; Xin-Quan Zhang; Wenjing Zhang; Mu-Tung Chang; Cheng-Te Lin; Kai-Di Chang; Ya-Chu Yu; Jacob Tse-Wei Wang; Chia-Seng Chang; Lain-Jong Li; Tsung-Wu Lin
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  Role of alkali metal promoter in enhancing lateral growth of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides.

Authors:  Hyun Kim; Gang Hee Han; Seok Joon Yun; Jiong Zhao; Dong Hoon Keum; Hye Yun Jeong; Thuc Hue Ly; Youngjo Jin; Ji-Hoon Park; Byoung Hee Moon; Sung-Wng Kim; Young Hee Lee
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.874

8.  Scalable growth of high-quality polycrystalline MoS(2) monolayers on SiO(2) with tunable grain sizes.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Hua Yu; Wei Chen; Xuezeng Tian; Donghua Liu; Meng Cheng; Guibai Xie; Wei Yang; Rong Yang; Xuedong Bai; Dongxia Shi; Guangyu Zhang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Tuning the electrical property via defect engineering of single layer MoS2 by oxygen plasma.

Authors:  Muhammad R Islam; Narae Kang; Udai Bhanu; Hari P Paudel; Mikhail Erementchouk; Laurene Tetard; Michael N Leuenberger; Saiful I Khondaker
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 7.790

10.  Spectroscopic Signatures of AA' and AB Stacking of Chemical Vapor Deposited Bilayer MoS2.

Authors:  Ming Xia; Bo Li; Kuibo Yin; Giovanni Capellini; Gang Niu; Yongji Gong; Wu Zhou; Pulickel M Ajayan; Ya-Hong Xie
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 15.881

View more
  2 in total

1.  Induced 2H-Phase Formation and Low Thermal Conductivity by Reactive Spark Plasma Sintering of 1T-Phase Pristine and Co-Doped MoS2 Nanosheets.

Authors:  Cédric Bourgès; Ralph Rajamathi; C Nethravathi; Michael Rajamathi; Takao Mori
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-11-23

2.  Microwave Synthesis of Molybdenum Disulfide Nanoparticles Using Response Surface Methodology for Tribological Application.

Authors:  Thachnatharen Nagarajan; Mohammad Khalid; Nanthini Sridewi; Priyanka Jagadish; Rashmi Walvekar
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 5.719

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.