To achieve large area growth of transition metal dichalcogenides of uniform monolayer thickness, we demonstrate metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) growth under low pressure followed by a high-temperature sulfurization process under atmospheric pressure (AP). Following sulfurization, the MOCVD-grown continuous MoS2 film transforms into compact triangular crystals of uniform monolayer thickness as confirmed from the sharp distinct photoluminescence peak at 1.8 eV. Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies confirm that the structural disorders and chalcogen vacancies inherent to the as-grown MOCVD film are substantially healed and carbon/oxygen contaminations are heavily suppressed. The as-grown MOCVD film has a Mo/S ratio of 1:1.6 and an average defect length of ∼1.56 nm, which improve to 1:1.97 and ∼21 nm, respectively, upon sulfurization. The effect of temperature and duration of the sulfurization process on the morphology and stoichiometry of the grown film is investigated in detail. Compared to the APCVD growth, this two-step growth process shows more homogenous distribution of the triangular monolayer MoS2 domains across the entire substrate, while demonstrating comparable electrical performance.
To achieve large area growth of transition metal dichalcogenides of uniform monolayer thickness, we demonstrate metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) growth under low pressure followed by a high-temperature sulfurization process under atmospheric pressure (AP). Following sulfurization, the MOCVD-grown continuous MoS2 film transforms into compact triangular crystals of uniform monolayer thickness as confirmed from the sharp distinct photoluminescence peak at 1.8 eV. Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies confirm that the structural disorders and chalcogen vacancies inherent to the as-grown MOCVD film are substantially healed and carbon/oxygen contaminations are heavily suppressed. The as-grown MOCVD film has a Mo/S ratio of 1:1.6 and an average defect length of ∼1.56 nm, which improve to 1:1.97 and ∼21 nm, respectively, upon sulfurization. The effect of temperature and duration of the sulfurization process on the morphology and stoichiometry of the grown film is investigated in detail. Compared to the APCVD growth, this two-step growth process shows more homogenous distribution of the triangular monolayer MoS2 domains across the entire substrate, while demonstrating comparable electrical performance.
Molybdenum
disulfide (MoS2), belonging to a special
family of 2D-layered materials called transition metal dichalcogenides
(TMDs), is one of the most thoroughly investigated material due to
its unique thickness-dependent electronic and optical properties.[1] When thinned down to a monolayer, it develops
a direct band gap which makes it suitable for applications such as
low-power field-effect transistors (FETs),[2] optoelectronics,[3,4] and flexible electronics.[5] In addition, MoS2 has successfully
shown applications in other fields such as memory,[6] gas sensors,[7] logic circuits,[8] spintronics,[9] valleytronics,[10] and so forth. With such a promise as an emerging
candidate for next-generation electronics, it is imperative to have
a repeatable, reliable, scalable, and cost-effective synthesis method
for uniform large-scale monolayer MoS2. Among various bottom-up
synthesis processes, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) has been widely
used in growing large area crystalline films with properties comparable
to flakes exfoliated mechanically from bulk.[11−13] CVD growth
of MoS2 is realized by different approaches, the most common
one being the molybdenum oxide (MoO3) solid precursor-based
CVD under atmospheric pressure (APCVD).[14−17] Although full wafer scale growth
with grain size as large as hundreds of micrometers can be achieved
using the CVD method,[11,18] the process suffers severely
from several limitations such as overall thickness control, uniformity
of grain size/coverage, and repeatability.[19,20] Since the powder-based MoO3 precursor has a low vapor
pressure, it must be placed in the central heating zone of the furnace
which compromises precise control over the ratio of precursor flux,
leading to nonuniform thicknesses and inhomogeneity in domain sizes.[21] To combat these issues, the use of metal organic
precursors having high vapor pressure is being investigated.[22] Metal organic CVD (MOCVD) offers more efficient
control over the metal flux, and thus, the ratio of metal to chalcogen
flux that reaches the substrate can be tailored as required, thereby
ensuring uniform thickness control. Several reports have demonstrated
MOCVD growth of MoS2 using precursors such as molyhexacarbonyl
[Mo(CO)6] for metal and diethyl sulfide [(C2H5)2S] for chalcogen.[23−25] Diethyl sulfide
inherently leaves considerable carbon residues on the film that degrades
material properties.[26] Other routes involve
creating an air- and moisture-stable precursor tetrakis(diethylaminodithiocarbomato)
molybdate(IV) (Mo(Et2NCS2)4) first
and then decomposing this single source to form MoS2 via
MOCVD.[27] Regardless of the precursors used,
the growth often results in a polycrystalline film with domain sizes
in the order of nanometers.[25,28,29] Recently, MOCVD growths of MoS2 with domain sizes larger
than 10 μm have been reported. However, they involve long processing
times (∼26 h per monolayer)[23] or
require the substrates to be pre-exposed to halides,[25,30] which form the sodium/potassium metal oxide layer below the TMD
monolayer, as a byproduct.[31] So far, an
optimized MOCVD method that yields large-area single-crystal monolayer
domains with uniform coverage across the entire substrate and free
of contamination, for example, carbon and/or alkali metal oxides,
is yet to be developed.In this work, we report large-area MOCVD
growth of the MoS2 film that transforms into homogeneous
distribution of single-crystal
triangular domains of monolayer thickness by its controlled sulfurization.
Several characterization techniques, for example, Raman and photoluminescence
(PL) spectroscopies, optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy
(SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS), are used to determine the crystalline quality, surface morphology,
stoichiometry, and contamination level upon sulfurization of the grown
films. Following sulfurization, MOCVD-grown MoS2 monolayer
domains also show electrical properties that are comparable to those
grown by the APCVD method.
Experimental Methods
Material Synthesis
MOCVD Growth of MoS2
Large-area MoS2 was synthesized in an
MOCVD growth system
under low-pressure conditions [Figure a]. The system consists of a quartz tube with an inner
diameter of 22 mm (outer diameter = 25 mm) inside a single zone Lindberg/Blue
M furnace. The precursors used for MoS2 growth are molybdenum
hexacarbonyl, Mo(CO)6 (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number 13939-06-05,
99.9%), and diethyl sulfide, (C2H5)2S (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS number 352-93-2, 98%). The target substrate
used in this work was 285 nm SiO2 grown on highly doped
double-side-polished p-type Si. At the start of the growth process,
the target substrate (measuring 10 cm × 1.7 cm) was placed approximately
10 cm into the furnace and the system was pumped down to base pressure
(∼1.5 mTorr) following which three subsequent purge cycles
using ultrahigh purity Ar at 100 sccm were performed. Afterward, Ar
flow was cut off and H2 flow was introduced at 5 sccm as
the carrier gas for the rest of the growth. Background pressure of
the system was held at 5 mTorr. Mo(CO)6 and (C2H5)2S precursors were kept in bubblers in APs
at 45 °C and at room temperature, respectively, and the flow
rates were controlled via needle valves. The growth was conducted
at 850 °C for a duration of 1 min after which the precursor gas
flow was cut off and the furnace was allowed to cool down, with only
the carrier gas flowing.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic of the MOCVD growth system. The
Raman spectrum of
the MoS2 films (b) before and (c) after sulfurization at
850 °C for 30 min. The inset shows the SEM image of a triangular
MoS2 domain following sulfurization.
(a) Schematic of the MOCVD growth system. The
Raman spectrum of
the MoS2 films (b) before and (c) after sulfurization at
850 °C for 30 min. The inset shows the SEM image of a triangular
MoS2 domain following sulfurization.
Postgrowth Sulfurization
In another
single-zone Lindberg/Blue M CVD furnace, the MOCVD-grown MoS2 sample was loaded in the center with sulfur powder (Sigma-Aldrich,
CAS number 7704-34-9, 99.98%) positioned upstream relative to the
MoS2 sample and heated separately using a heating coil.
The as-grown samples were sulfurized at different temperatures for
different durations. The sulfurization procedure was initiated by
increasing the temperature of the MoS2 sample to the target
temperature. Sulfur was heated to 150 °C, and a carrier gas (N2) was flown in at 10 sccm. After holding the MoS2 film at the target temperature for the desired duration, the furnace
heating and the heating coil for sulfur were cut off and subsequently
allowed to cool down without any feedback control.
APCVD Growth of MoS2
A clean double-side-polished
Si/SiO2 (300 nm, thermally
grown oxide) substrate was placed on an alumina combustion boat/crucible
containing 8.5 mg of MoO3 (99.5% pure Alfa Aesar, CAS 1313-27-5)
and placed inside a 1 in. quartz tube and positioned at the center
of a single-zone Lindberg/Blue M furnace.[32] A second boat containing S (99.98% Sigma-Aldrich CAS: 7704-34-9)
was placed upstream in the tube outside the central heating zone of
the furnace, and a separate coil heater was attached to apply heat
to the S boat. The system was pumped down to base pressure (∼1.5
mTorr) and purged three times using ultrahigh pure N2 at
200 sccm. The growth was conducted at 850 °C (with S kept at
150 °C) for 5 min under ambient pressure with a carrier gas (N2) flow rate at 10 sccm. The furnace was then turned off, and
the lid was opened to let the furnace cool down under ambient conditions.
Material Characterization
A Veeco
tapping-mode AFM instrument was used to image the grown MoS2. Raman and PL spectroscopies were performed on all the samples before
and after sulfurization using a Renishaw inVia Raman spectrophotometer
system, coupled with 532 nm green laser. Raman and PL spectra were
collected using a grating with 3000 lines/mm and 1200 lines/mm, respectively.
XPS spectra were recorded using a commercial X-ray photoelectron spectrometer
(Kratos Axis Ultra), utilizing a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source
(hυ = 1486.5 eV), electrostatic lens optics,
and a multichannel plate and delay line detector coupled to a hemispherical
analyzer. The photoelectron takeoff angle was normal to the surface
of the sample and 45° with respect to the X-ray beam. High-resolution
spectra were collected with a pass energy of 20 eV. The pressure in
the XPS chamber was typically 2 × 10–9 Torr
during data acquisition.
Device Fabrication and
Measurement
Uniform monolayer MoS2 domains on
Si/SiO2 substrates
were identified using a combination of optical contrast, Raman spectroscopy,
and AFM. Device active regions and source/drain metal electrodes were
defined with electron beam lithography. A stack of Ni/Au (20 nm/30
nm) was deposited as source/drain metal electrodes using an e-beam
evaporator. All electrical DC measurements were performed on a Cascade
Microtech Summit 11000B-AP probe station using an Agilent 4156C parameter
analyzer in ambient at room temperature under dark.
Results and Discussions
The experimental setup used for
MOCVD growth of MoS2 is schematically shown in Figure a. Gas-phase metal–organic
precursors molybdenum
hexacarbonyl Mo(CO)6 and diethyl sulfide (C2H5)2S are used to grow a thin film of MoS2 under low pressure (∼1.5 mTorr). Growth at 850 °C
for 1 min duration results in complete coverage of the Si/SiO2 substrate with a continuous film, as shown in the AFM image
[Figure S1]. Raman spectroscopic measurements
show two distinct peaks at ∼386 and ∼406 cm–1, which coincide with the Mo–S phonon modes E2g1 (in-plane) and
A1g (out-of-plane) peaks of MoS2, respectively,
as found in the literature[33] [Figure b]. However, the
asymmetry in the E2g1 peak suggests the presence of defect-activated peaks and/or
peaks due to intermediate oxides that are formed during growth.[34] In CVD-grown MoS2, sulfur vacancies
are one of the most common defects[35,36] which results
in unsaturated chemical bond formation between Mo atoms. These bonds
can interact with neighboring S atoms and disturb the crystal symmetry
which activates phonon modes otherwise unavailable in pristine MoS2. The peak at ∼229 cm–1, referred
to as LA(M), possibly originates from the presence of a local maximum
in the vibrational density of states located at the energy corresponding
to the longitudinal acoustic (LA) branch at the edge of the Brillouin
zone.[37] Other prominent defect-induced
peaks that arise at ∼359, ∼180, and ∼187 cm–1 are assigned to the TO(M), ZA(M), and TA(K) modes,
respectively.[38] In addition, linewidths
of the first-order Raman peaks are wider than those obtained for monolayer
MoS2 exfoliated from bulk [Figure S2], thereby corroborating the presence of structural disorders in
the grown film.[39] These vacancies and disorders
can be “repaired” to a great extent by annealing post
growth in a S-rich environment. Upon sulfurization at 850 °C
under AP for 30 min (more details in the Material
Synthesis section), the as-grown film transforms into isolated
monolayer triangular domains, as seen in the inset of Figure c. During the sulfurization
process at high temperature, the carbon impurities from the organic
precursors and oxide-based intermediate compounds can be desorbed
from the MOCVD-grown film. The incoming S adatoms can react with these
unpassivated Mo sites, as well as with the desorbed intermediate compounds
in the gas phase, leading to MoS2 triangular domains. Figure c shows the Raman
spectrum of the MOCVD-grown MoS2 film after sulfurization.
Most of the defect-induced peaks present in the as-grown sample disappear
following sulfurization and the first-order peak intensities and linewidths
are greatly improved [Figure S3], indicating
reduction in defect density and improvement in crystalline quality.
An additional peak at ∼450 cm–1 now appears
after sulfurization due to fewer defects and is attributed to an overlap
of two peaks: the second order of the LA mode at the M-point called
the 2LA(M) peak and a first-order optical phonon peak A2u.[38,40] More detailed Raman spectroscopic analyses
for sulfurization at different temperatures and durations are discussed
in the later subsections.To compare our two-step growth process
with that of other widely
used methods, we have conducted growth of MoS2 via the
solid-precursor-based (MoO3 and S powder) APCVD method. Figure a shows an optical
micrograph of MoS2 grown on the Si/SiO2 substrate.
Compact MoS2 domains as large as 40–50 μm
are primarily triangular or hexagonal in shape [as shown in the optical
and SEM images in Figure b,c, respectively]. Figure d,e shows Raman and PL spectroscopies of a typical
monolayer domain grown by APCVD. The Raman peak difference of ∼19
cm–1 and a sharp distinct PL peak at 1.86 eV [full
width at half-maximum (fwhm) is ∼0.06 eV] are consistent with
those of monolayer MoS2.[33] While
this method produces MoS2 with quality comparable to exfoliated
flakes, a large portion of the substrate is rendered unusable due
to very thick deposits of MoS2, MoO3, and intermediate
compounds. The experimental setup used for APCVD growth of MoS2 involves placing the substrate face-down on top of a crucible
containing MoO3 powder. Since MoO3 is a low-vapor-pressure
solid, it needs to be placed at the center of the heating zone at
850 °C, and hence, the metal precursor flux cannot be precisely
controlled. This setup causes majority of the MoO3 powder
to evaporate and/or react with S powder either partially or completely
depending on local Mo/S ratios. In addition to MoS2 with
varying thicknesses, the unreacted and partially reacted MoO3 also deposit on the central region of the substrate, and monolayer
MoS2 is formed only in the faint blue region along its
periphery [Figure a]. Figure f shows
SEM images from six different points marked on different locations
in Figure a (color-coded),
showing the variation in domain shapes, sizes, distribution, and thicknesses.
Domain sizes range from 5 to 100 μm, from the monolayer to bulk
in thickness, and the nucleation density decreases as we move downstream.
Sharp gradient of concentration of domains across the sample is clearly
seen in Figure f where
the domain density decreases as we move further away from the MoO3 source, indicating a nonhomogeneous coverage. These differences
in local Mo/S ratios also give rise to different morphologies, triangles
and hexagons, as shown in the inset of Figure f.
Figure 2
APCVD growth of MoS2: (a) optical
image of the Si/SiO2 substrate after APCVD growth of MoS2. (b) Optical
and (c) SEM images of triangular MoS2 domains. Scale bars
are 10 μm. Corresponding Raman and PL spectra are shown in (d,e),
respectively. (f) Variation of MoS2 domain size, shape,
nucleation density, and thickness in different locations of the sample
[color-coded accordingly in (a)]. Scale bars for all the images are
100 μm. Insets show magnified images (scale bars are 25 μm)
of one of the domains to signify the domain shape. MOCVD growth of
MoS2: (g) optical image of the Si/SiO2 substrate
after MOCVD growth of MoS2 followed by sulfurization. (h)
Optical and (i) SEM images and the corresponding (j) Raman and (k)
PL spectra of triangular MOCVD MoS2 domains. Scale bars
are 20 μm for (h) and 10 μm for (i). (l) Uniformity of
MoS2 domain size, shape, nucleation density, and thickness
in different locations of the sample [color-coded accordingly in (g)].
Scale bars are 100 μm.
APCVD growth of MoS2: (a) optical
image of the Si/SiO2 substrate after APCVD growth of MoS2. (b) Optical
and (c) SEM images of triangular MoS2 domains. Scale bars
are 10 μm. Corresponding Raman and PL spectra are shown in (d,e),
respectively. (f) Variation of MoS2 domain size, shape,
nucleation density, and thickness in different locations of the sample
[color-coded accordingly in (a)]. Scale bars for all the images are
100 μm. Insets show magnified images (scale bars are 25 μm)
of one of the domains to signify the domain shape. MOCVD growth of
MoS2: (g) optical image of the Si/SiO2 substrate
after MOCVD growth of MoS2 followed by sulfurization. (h)
Optical and (i) SEM images and the corresponding (j) Raman and (k)
PL spectra of triangular MOCVD MoS2 domains. Scale bars
are 20 μm for (h) and 10 μm for (i). (l) Uniformity of
MoS2 domain size, shape, nucleation density, and thickness
in different locations of the sample [color-coded accordingly in (g)].
Scale bars are 100 μm.Figure g shows
an optical micrograph of MoS2 grown on the Si/SiO2 substrate via the two-step MOCVD method. Unlike solid-precursor-based
APCVD growth, MOCVD uses gas-phase precursors, which results in more
uniform film coverage across the substrate. Following the postgrowth
sulfurization process at 850 °C for 30 min, mostly isolated triangular
MoS2 domains of ∼30 μm in size are formed
[as shown in the optical and SEM images in Figure h,i, respectively], with a few occurrences
of the domains merging to form different types of grain boundaries
[as shown in Figure S4], as also observed
in MoS2 grown by the APCVD method.[41−43] Raman [Figure j] and PL [Figure k] spectroscopies
closely match with that of APCVD-grown MoS2 and the reported
literature.[41] A slight shift in PL peak
position in the case of MOCVD sulfurized domains may be attributed
to the strain associated with the high-temperature annealing process.
This strain is relaxed upon transfer of the film from the growth substrate.[41] SEM images taken from six different spots of
the MOCVD film following sulfurization [as marked in Figure g] are shown in Figure l. Raman spectra from different
spots across different MoS2 domains are shown in Figure S5 which does not show any significant
variation. These observations confirm that unlike APCVD, this method
produces triangular monolayer domains distributed homogeneously across
the entire substrate.To study the effect of annealing conditions,
several identical
MoS2 samples grown by MOCVD were annealed at different
temperatures/durations in a S-rich environment. Figure a shows the comparison among normalized Raman
spectra of the grown film sulfurized for 30 min at different temperatures:
550, 650, 750, and 850 °C. With the increase in the sulfurization
temperature, the distortion in the E2g1 peak which usually arises from the presence
of oxide-based intermediate compounds and defects in the MoS2 film gradually transforms into a sharp distinct peak, as expected
for pristine single-crystal MoS2. This improvement in crystalline
quality is further confirmed from the enhanced peak intensities and
reduced linewidths of the first-order Raman peaks. Figure b shows variation in peak intensities
and the fwhm with increased sulfurization temperature for the A1g Raman peak. As the sulfurization temperature increases,
linewidth of the A1g peak decreases from 6.02 to 4.55 cm–1 which indicates gradual reduction in structural disorder[44] [Figure b]. A similar trend in Raman E2g1 linewidth with sulfurization temperature
is shown in Figure S6. The improvement
in crystalline quality is also evident from the enhanced PL peak intensities[45] and narrow PL peak width for the sample sulfurized
at 850 °C for 30 min, signifying the direct band gap for monolayer
MoS2 at 1.8 eV, as shown in Figure c. Transformation of the continuous MOCVD-grown
MoS2 film into monolayer domains upon sulfurization at
various temperatures is shown in Figure S7. Further increase in the sulfurization temperature, however, produces
noncompact sparsely populated thicker MoS2, as shown in Figure S8.
Figure 3
Comparison of Raman and PL spectra of
the as-grown MOCVD film following
sulfurization at different temperatures and durations. All Raman data
have been normalized with respect to Si. (a) Comparison of Raman spectra
for the samples sulfurized at different temperatures: 550, 650, 750,
and 850 °C. The sulfurization duration was kept 30 min for all
the samples. (b) Variation of A1g fwhm and normalized A1g peak intensity with respect to sulfurization temperature.
(c) PL spectra for different samples sulfurized at different temperatures.
(d) Comparison of the MoS2 Raman peaks as a function of
sulfurization duration: as-grown and 5 and 30 min. Sulfurization temperature
was kept at 850 °C for all the samples. (e) Variation of A1g fwhm and normalized peak intensity with respect to sulfurization
duration. Corresponding variation in PL spectra is shown in (f).
Comparison of Raman and PL spectra of
the as-grown MOCVD film following
sulfurization at different temperatures and durations. All Raman data
have been normalized with respect to Si. (a) Comparison of Raman spectra
for the samples sulfurized at different temperatures: 550, 650, 750,
and 850 °C. The sulfurization duration was kept 30 min for all
the samples. (b) Variation of A1g fwhm and normalized A1g peak intensity with respect to sulfurization temperature.
(c) PL spectra for different samples sulfurized at different temperatures.
(d) Comparison of the MoS2 Raman peaks as a function of
sulfurization duration: as-grown and 5 and 30 min. Sulfurization temperature
was kept at 850 °C for all the samples. (e) Variation of A1g fwhm and normalized peak intensity with respect to sulfurization
duration. Corresponding variation in PL spectra is shown in (f).Figure d–f
shows the Raman and PL spectra of the as-grown MOCVD films compared
to samples that were sulfurized at 850 °C for 5 and 30 min. Although
optically no significant difference is observed for the duration of
5 min sulfurization, monolayer triangular MoS2 domains
appear after 30 min and are distributed uniformly across the substrate
(Figure S9). The A1g peak intensity
and fwhm also improve accordingly, as shown in Figure e. The corresponding PL spectra and gradual
improvements in the fwhm are compared in Figures f and S10, respectively.Using diethyl sulfide as the chalcogen precursor in MOCVD growth
leaves significant carbon residues in the grown film.[23] The Raman spectrum from the as-grown film in Figure (black line) shows the presence
of peaks at the defect-related D-band at ∼1347 cm–1 and the graphite-related G band at ∼1597 cm–1,[46] confirming the presence of carbonaceous
compounds. Similar observation has also been made by Choudhury et
al.[47] and also by Zhang et al.,[48] where the presence of the carbon G peak is observed
for the films grown at different temperatures. These peaks disappear
completely following sulfurization [Figure , blue line], indicating significant reduction
in carbon contamination.
Figure 4
Raman spectra from the MOCVD-grown MoS2 sample showing
a prominent graphite-oxide peak (black line) arising from carbon impurities
which are suppressed in the sample following sulfurization (blue line).
Raman spectra from the MOCVD-grown MoS2 sample showing
a prominent graphite-oxide peak (black line) arising from carbon impurities
which are suppressed in the sample following sulfurization (blue line).To further check the film quality and to confirm
the presence of
oxide and carbon contamination, elemental analysis and chemical stoichiometry
quantification were investigated using XPS. Survey spectra from the
as-grown and the sulfurized films are shown in the Supporting Information
[Figure S11], and all the major peaks are
identified. Figure shows high-resolution spectra for Mo-3d, S-2p, and C-1s peaks from
the as-grown MOCVD film [Figure a] and from samples sulfurized under the optimized
conditions [Figure b]. The Mo-3d spectra show the clear presence of molybdenum oxide
at 236.5 eV on the as-grown film that almost vanishes after sulfurization,
indicating conversion of the remaining oxides to MoS2.[49] In addition to this, MOCVD film quality suffers
greatly due to significant carbon contamination arising from organic
precursors such as diethyl sulfide, as mentioned previously [Figure ]. C-1s spectra from
the as-grown film [Figure a] can be resolved into the following components: C–C
at 284.8 eV, C–O at 286.6 eV, and C=O at 288.8 eV. Upon
sulfurization at 850 °C for 30 min, most of the carbon contamination
is reduced as seen from a sharp decline in the peak intensity of C-1s
spectra in Figure b. Some carbon, however, is still present as is the case with all
materials that have been exposed to the ambient. The stoichiometry
as calculated from the integrated peak areas of Mo and S is found
to be Mo/S = 1:1.6 for the as-grown film. This means that about 20%
of the sulfur sites are vacancies. If we assume a uniform distribution
of the sulfur vacancies, one in every five S-sites has S missing.
Considering the distance between adjacent S-sites to be 0.316 nm,
the average distance of defects, LD, is
found to be ∼1.58 nm. Upon sulfurization, the stoichiometry
improves to almost a near ideal value of 1:1.97 which corresponds
to an average interdefect distance of ∼21.06 nm. This is a
∼13-fold increase in the average interdefect distance, and
it clearly shows the significant improvement in the film quality upon
sulfurization. Figure S12 shows the improvement
in stoichiometry of MoS2 with increasing sulfurization
temperatures. This agrees well with the Raman spectroscopic analyses
in Figure where sulfurization
helps mitigate the defect-activated Raman modes. In addition, as the
defect density decreases, first-order Raman peaks undergo slight shifts,
which may arise due to phonon confinement, as seen previously in the
case of graphene and other disordered crystals.[38] To demonstrate the gradual improvement in the film quality
with increasing sulfurization temperature/durations, Figure shows the high-resolution
XPS analyses for the samples sulfurized under different conditions.
Annealing for 30 min at different temperatures in a S environment
and for different durations at 850 °C is shown in Figure a,b and 6c,d, respectively. The ratio of MoO3 to MoS2 and the carbon peak intensity gradually decrease with increasing
sulfurization temperature [Figures b and S13] and duration
[Figure d], signifying
a substantial reduction in defects and oxide/carbon contaminations.
Figure 5
High-resolution
XPS spectra from MoS2 films compared
before and after sulfurization: Mo-3d, S-2p, and C-1s peaks from (a)
the as-grown and (b) after sulfurization at 850 °C for 30 min.
Figure 6
(a,b) Comparison of XPS spectra of MoS2 films
sulfurized
at different temperatures: (a) high-resolution C-1s, Mo-3d, and S-2p
peaks and the (b) corresponding variation of C-1s peak intensities
and normalized MoO3/MoS2 peak ratios. (c,d)
Comparison of XPS spectra of MoS2 sulfurized for different
durations: (c) high-resolution C-1s, Mo-3d, and S-2p peaks and the
(d) corresponding variation of C-1s peak intensities and normalized
MoO3/MoS2 peak ratios.
High-resolution
XPS spectra from MoS2 films compared
before and after sulfurization: Mo-3d, S-2p, and C-1s peaks from (a)
the as-grown and (b) after sulfurization at 850 °C for 30 min.(a,b) Comparison of XPS spectra of MoS2 films
sulfurized
at different temperatures: (a) high-resolution C-1s, Mo-3d, and S-2p
peaks and the (b) corresponding variation of C-1s peak intensities
and normalized MoO3/MoS2 peak ratios. (c,d)
Comparison of XPS spectra of MoS2 sulfurized for different
durations: (c) high-resolution C-1s, Mo-3d, and S-2p peaks and the
(d) corresponding variation of C-1s peak intensities and normalized
MoO3/MoS2 peak ratios.To test the electrical quality of the film following sulfurization,
back-gated FETs were fabricated on transferred MoS2. Electrical
properties of the as-grown film (Figure S14) show no modulation that could arise due to the presence of defects
in the as-grown film.[50] The sulfurized
film was transferred via a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-based
wet transfer method using NaOH as the substrate etchant onto the target
Si/SiO2 substrate with alignment mark. Figure a shows PL spectra of a MoS2 domain before and after transfer. Shift in the PL peak position
upon transfer indicates relaxation of strain that develops during
the high-temperature growth and annealing cycles.[41] Suitable MoS2 domains were identified using
a combination of optical contrast, Raman spectroscopy, and AFM images.
Next, drain/source metal contacts were patterned using e-beam lithography
and, subsequently, contact metals (Ni/Au 20 nm/30 nm) were deposited
using e-beam evaporation followed by liftoff. An optical image of
the final device structure used is shown in the inset of Figure b. Electrical measurements
were performed under ambient at room temperature without any illumination. Figure b shows the IDS–VGS transfer
characteristics of a SiO2/Si back-gated MoS2 transistor with 285 nm-thick SiO2 being the back-gate
dielectric. The back-gate voltage (VBG) is swept from −30 to 60 V at a drain voltage of 2 V. The
device exhibits a threshold voltage (Vth) of around −10 V. The ON/OFF ratios exceed 106 at a VDS of 2 V with off-state currents
less than 1 pA. Using the slope of the IDS–VGS curve in the linear region,
the field-effect mobility is calculated using where L, W, and Cox are the channel length, width,
and dielectric capacitance, respectively. Using a value of Cox = 12 nF/cm2 (for 285 nm-thick
SiO2) and L = 500 nm, we obtain a field-effect
mobility value of ∼1 cm2/(V s), which is comparable
to reported values for CVDMoS2 FETs on thermally grown
SiO2.[51−53]Figure c shows the IDS–VDS output curves for back-gate voltages of 20 V to 60
V with an interval of 10 V. From the exponential IDS–VDS at small VDS, it is evident that a Schottky contact is
formed, typical for SiO2/Si back-gated MoS2 FETs.[54]
Figure 7
(a) Comparison of PL spectra of the sulfurized MoS2 domain
before and after a PMMA-based wet transfer. (b) Transfer characteristics
for the MoS2-based transistor with a channel length of
500 nm. Optical image of the device is shown in the inset. (c) Output
characteristics of the MoS2 transistor in (b).
(a) Comparison of PL spectra of the sulfurized MoS2 domain
before and after a PMMA-based wet transfer. (b) Transfer characteristics
for the MoS2-based transistor with a channel length of
500 nm. Optical image of the device is shown in the inset. (c) Output
characteristics of the MoS2 transistor in (b).
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have grown
a continuous MoS2 film
via MOCVD and demonstrated its controlled sulfurization to form single-crystal
domains with uniform monolayer thickness. The effect of sulfurization
temperature and duration is investigated, and an optimized condition
is proposed to obtain a homogeneous distribution of large-area single-crystal
monolayer domains. The sulfurization process heals sulfur vacancies
in the as-grown film, thereby improving the stoichiometry of MoS2, as verified by XPS quantification. Interestingly, carbon
contamination, one of the main challenges associated with metal organic
precursors, is highly suppressed following sulfurization, as evident
from both Raman and XPS analyses. Monolayer nature, high crystallinity,
and uniformity of MoS2 domains are confirmed via Raman
and PL spectroscopies. Electrical characterization of MoS2 following sulfurization shows performance comparable to that grown
by the APCVD method. Our results indicate that this two-step growth
method can be considered as a reliable and efficient way to synthesize
large-area single-crystal homogeneous domains of MoS2 with
uniform monolayer coverage and can also be applied to other sulfur-based
TMDs.
Authors: Yi Rang Lim; Wooseok Song; Jin Kyu Han; Young Bum Lee; Sung Jun Kim; Sung Myung; Sun Sook Lee; Ki-Seok An; Chel-Jong Choi; Jongsun Lim Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Muhammad R Islam; Narae Kang; Udai Bhanu; Hari P Paudel; Mikhail Erementchouk; Laurene Tetard; Michael N Leuenberger; Saiful I Khondaker Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2014-09-07 Impact factor: 7.790