Lisa C Lindley1, Radion Svynarenko1, Kim Mooney-Doyle2, Annette Mendola3, Wendy C Naumann4, Jessica Keim-Malpass5. 1. College of Nursing, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. 2. School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, USA. 4. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. 5. School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children at end of life have unique and complex care needs. Although there is increasing evidence about pediatric concurrent hospice care, the health care services received while in hospice have not received sufficient attention. OBJECTIVES: To examine the health care services, unique clusters of health care services, and characteristics of the children in the clusters. METHODS: Multiple data sources were used including national Medicaid claims data. Children under 21years in pediatric concurrent hospice care were included. Using Medicaid categories assigned to claims, health care services were distributed across 20 categories. Latent class analysis was used to identify clusters of health care services. Demographic profiles of the clusters were created. RESULTS: The 6,243 children in the study generated approximately 500,0000 non-hospice, health care service claims while enrolled in hospice care. We identified 3 unique classes of health care services use: low (61.1%), moderate (18.1%), and high (20.8%) intensity. The children in the 3 classes exhibited unique demographic profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Health care services cluster together in unique fashion with distinct patterns among children in concurrent hospice care. The findings suggest that concurrent hospice care is not a 1-size-fit all solution for children. Concurrent hospice care may be customized and require attention to care coordination to ensure high-quality care.
BACKGROUND: Children at end of life have unique and complex care needs. Although there is increasing evidence about pediatric concurrent hospice care, the health care services received while in hospice have not received sufficient attention. OBJECTIVES: To examine the health care services, unique clusters of health care services, and characteristics of the children in the clusters. METHODS: Multiple data sources were used including national Medicaid claims data. Children under 21years in pediatric concurrent hospice care were included. Using Medicaid categories assigned to claims, health care services were distributed across 20 categories. Latent class analysis was used to identify clusters of health care services. Demographic profiles of the clusters were created. RESULTS: The 6,243 children in the study generated approximately 500,0000 non-hospice, health care service claims while enrolled in hospice care. We identified 3 unique classes of health care services use: low (61.1%), moderate (18.1%), and high (20.8%) intensity. The children in the 3 classes exhibited unique demographic profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Health care services cluster together in unique fashion with distinct patterns among children in concurrent hospice care. The findings suggest that concurrent hospice care is not a 1-size-fit all solution for children. Concurrent hospice care may be customized and require attention to care coordination to ensure high-quality care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Medicaid; administrative data; concurrent hospice care; health care services; latent class analysis; pediatric hospice care
Authors: Lauren D Garfield; Derek S Brown; Benjamin T Allaire; Raven E Ross; Ginger E Nicol; Ramesh Raghavan Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Vincent Mor; Nina R Joyce; Danielle L Coté; Risha A Gidwani; Mary Ersek; Cari R Levy; Katherine E Faricy-Anderson; Susan C Miller; Todd H Wagner; Bruce P Kinosian; Karl A Lorenz; Scott T Shreve Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lisa C Lindley; Jessica Keim-Malpass; Radion Svynarenko; Melanie J Cozad; Jennifer W Mack; Pamela S Hinds Journal: J Hosp Palliat Nurs Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 2.131
Authors: Karin Zimmermann; Eva Bergstraesser; Sandra Engberg; Anne-Sylvie Ramelet; Katrin Marfurt-Russenberger; Nicolas Von der Weid; Chantal Grandjean; Patricia Fahrni-Nater; Eva Cignacco Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Lisa C Lindley; Radion Svynarenko; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Annette Mendola; Wendy C Naumann; Robin Harris Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 2.468
Authors: Melanie J Cozad; Radion Svynarenko; Pamela S Hinds; Jennifer W Mack; Jessica Keim-Malpass; Lisa C Lindley Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 2.090