Vincent Mor1,2, Nina R Joyce1,3, Danielle L Coté1, Risha A Gidwani4,5,6, Mary Ersek7,8, Cari R Levy9, Katherine E Faricy-Anderson1,10, Susan C Miller1,2, Todd H Wagner4,5,6, Bruce P Kinosian7,11, Karl A Lorenz5,6, Scott T Shreve12,13. 1. Center of Innovation, Providence Veterans Health Administration (VA) Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island. 2. Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island. 3. Department of Health Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. VA Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California. 5. Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California. 6. School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 7. Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 8. National Performance Reporting and Outcomes Measurement to Improve the Standard of Care at End-of-Life (PROMISE) Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. 9. Eastern Colorado VA Healthcare System, Denver, Colorado. 10. Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 11. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 12. Hospice and Palliative Care Program, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. 13. Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unlike Medicare, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) health care system does not require veterans with cancer to make the "terrible choice" between receipt of hospice services or disease-modifying chemotherapy/radiation therapy. For this report, the authors characterized the VA's provision of concurrent care, defined as days in the last 6 months of life during which veterans simultaneously received hospice services and chemotherapy or radiation therapy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included veteran decedents with cancer during 2006 through 2012 who were identified from claims with cancer diagnoses. Hospice and cancer treatment were identified using VA and Medicare administrative data. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the changes in concurrent care, hospice, palliative care, and chemotherapy or radiation treatment. RESULTS: The proportion of veterans receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy remained stable at approximately 45%, whereas the proportion of veterans who received hospice increased from 55% to 68%. The receipt of concurrent care also increased during this time from 16.2% to 24.5%. The median time between hospice initiation and death remained stable at around 21 days. Among veterans who received chemotherapy or radiation therapy in their last 6 months of life, the median time between treatment termination and death ranged from 35 to 40 days. There was considerable variation between VA medical centers in the use of concurrent care (interquartile range, 16%-34% in 2012). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent receipt of hospice and chemotherapy or radiation therapy increased among veterans dying from cancer without reductions in the receipt of cancer therapy. This approach reflects the expansion of hospice services in the VA with VA policy allowing the concurrent receipt of hospice and antineoplastic therapies. Cancer 2016;122:782-790.
BACKGROUND: Unlike Medicare, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) health care system does not require veterans with cancer to make the "terrible choice" between receipt of hospice services or disease-modifying chemotherapy/radiation therapy. For this report, the authors characterized the VA's provision of concurrent care, defined as days in the last 6 months of life during which veterans simultaneously received hospice services and chemotherapy or radiation therapy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included veteran decedents with cancer during 2006 through 2012 who were identified from claims with cancer diagnoses. Hospice and cancer treatment were identified using VA and Medicare administrative data. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the changes in concurrent care, hospice, palliative care, and chemotherapy or radiation treatment. RESULTS: The proportion of veterans receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy remained stable at approximately 45%, whereas the proportion of veterans who received hospice increased from 55% to 68%. The receipt of concurrent care also increased during this time from 16.2% to 24.5%. The median time between hospice initiation and death remained stable at around 21 days. Among veterans who received chemotherapy or radiation therapy in their last 6 months of life, the median time between treatment termination and death ranged from 35 to 40 days. There was considerable variation between VA medical centers in the use of concurrent care (interquartile range, 16%-34% in 2012). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent receipt of hospice and chemotherapy or radiation therapy increased among veterans dying from cancer without reductions in the receipt of cancer therapy. This approach reflects the expansion of hospice services in the VA with VA policy allowing the concurrent receipt of hospice and antineoplastic therapies. Cancer 2016;122:782-790.
Authors: Cari Levy; Mary Ersek; Winifred Scott; Joan G Carpenter; Jennifer Kononowech; Ciaran Phibbs; Jill Lowry; Jennifer Cohen; Marybeth Foglia Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Danielle R Heller; Raymond A Jean; Alexander S Chiu; Shelli I Feder; Vadim Kurbatov; Charles Cha; Sajid A Khan Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Fasiha Kanwal; Aylin Tansel; Jennifer R Kramer; Hua Feng; Steven M Asch; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ann M O'Hare; Catherine R Butler; Janelle S Taylor; Susan P Y Wong; Elizabeth K Vig; Ryan S Laundry; Melissa W Wachterman; Paul L Hebert; Chuan-Fen Liu; Nilka Rios-Burrows; Claire A Richards Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Carolyn J Presley; Ling Han; John R O'Leary; Weiwei Zhu; Emily Corneau; Herta Chao; Tracy Shamas; Michal Rose; Karl Lorenz; Cari R Levy; Vincent Mor; Cary P Gross Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Sandhya K Mudumbi; Claire E Bourgeois; Nicholas A Hoppman; Catherine H Smith; Manisha Verma; Marie A Bakitas; Cynthia J Brown; Alayne D Markland Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Taeko Minegishi; Melissa M Garrido; Michael Stein; Elizabeth M Oliva; Austin B Frakt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Vincent Mor; Todd H Wagner; Cari Levy; Mary Ersek; Susan C Miller; Risha Gidwani-Marszowski; Nina Joyce; Katherine Faricy-Anderson; Emily A Corneau; Karl Lorenz; Bruce Kinosian; Scott Shreve Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Kim Mooney-Doyle; Jessica Keim-Malpass; Radion Svynarenko; Lisa C Lindley Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Lisa C Lindley; Radion Svynarenko; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Annette Mendola; Wendy C Naumann; Jessica Keim-Malpass Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 2.500