| Literature DB >> 34031705 |
Karla M Treitl1, Jens Ricke2, Andrea Baur-Melnyk2.
Abstract
Myeloma-associated bone disease (MBD) develops in about 80-90% of patients and severely affects their quality of life, as it accounts for the majority of mortality and morbidity. Imaging in multiple myeloma (MM) and MBD is of utmost importance in order to detect bone and bone marrow lesions as well as extraosseous soft-tissue masses and complications before the initiation of treatment. It is required for determination of the stage of disease and aids in the assessment of treatment response. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) is the key modality to establish the initial diagnosis of MM and is now recommended as reference standard procedure for the detection of lytic destruction in MBD. In contrast, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) has higher sensitivity for the detection of focal and diffuse plasma cell infiltration patterns of the bone marrow and identifies them prior to osteolytic destruction. It is recommended for the evaluation of spinal and vertebral lesions, while functional, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) is a promising tool for the assessment of treatment response. This review addresses the current improvements and limitations of WBCT and WBMRI for diagnosis and staging in MM, underlining the fact that both modalities offer complementary information. It further summarizes the corresponding radiological findings and novel technological aspects of both modalities.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple myeloma; Plasma cell disorders; Whole-body imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34031705 PMCID: PMC8626374 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03799-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Skeletal Radiol ISSN: 0364-2348 Impact factor: 2.199
Fig. 1Axial view of a CT scan of the head in the bone window. The white arrows mark typical punched-out osteolytic lesions in the skull of a 48-year-old female patient with multiple myeloma
Fig. 2Image examples of a whole-body low-dose CT scan (a: scout). Images were reconstructed in axial 3 mm slices using the intermediate (b) and soft-tissue kernel (c) in order to evaluate soft-tissue masses and the intrathoracic and intra-abdominal organs. The skeleton is further reconstructed in coronal 3 mm slices using the bone kernel for the reading of the upper (skull, thorax, arms; b, d) and the lower parts (pelvis, legs; e) of the body. The spine is additionally reconstructed in sagittal orientation (f).
Summary of the recommended technical parameters and accepted alternatives for WBLDCT in MM [17]
| Parameters | Recommendation | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| No. of detector rows | At least 16 | |
| Field of view | From the cranial vertex to the prox. metaphyses of both tibiae incl. both humeri | |
| Regular patient positioning | Supine with both arms aside and above the skull with as little bending of the elbows as possible | Supine with both arms alongside the body underlaid with armrests to lift them above spine level |
| Positioning of obese or PRM | Supine with both arms placed in front of the body with both hands folded | |
| Tube voltage (kV) | 120 | 140 |
| Tube current–time product (mAs) | 50–70 | 14–25 |
| Collimation | 0.5–1.5 mm | – |
| Reconstruction convolution kernel | Combination of a sharp, high-frequency “bone” kernel and a smoother “soft-tissue” kernel | One singular intermediate, middle-frequency kernel permitting acquisition of all images with different window settings* |
| Iterative reconstruction algorithms | Requested, if possible, to reduce image noise and artifacts while reducing radiation exposure | |
| Thickness/increment of axial slices | 2/1 mm | 3/1.5 mm |
| MPRs | requested in sagittal and coronal direction and parallel to the long axis of the prox. extremities | |
Abbreviations: No.: number; prox.: proximal; incl.: inclusive; PRM: persons with reduced mobility; kV: kilovoltage; mAs: milliampere-seconds; mm: millimeters; MPRs: multiplanar reconstructions
* With the limitation that attenuation measurements of peripheral intramedullary lesions should not be performed on bone kernel-reconstructed images that were set on the soft-tissue window, but on soft-tissue kernel-reconstructed images
Fig. 3(a) Marked osteolytic lesions are detected in the 6th, 7th and 11th thoracic vertebral body and pathological fractures in the 7th and 11th vertebrae in the sagittal CT reconstruction of the spine in the bone window. Additional lesions are suspected in the 8th–10th vertebral body. MRI of the patient using a T1-weighted (b) and a STIR (c) sequence in sagittal orientation confirms the involvement of myeloma in the 6th, 7th and 11th vertebrae, while end plate-associated edema due to degenerative disease is seen in the 8th and 9th thoracic vertebrae. Thus, CT can sometimes over-diagnose myeloma involvement in cases of osteoporosis and inhomogeneous bone structure
Fig. 4Illustration of typical marrow infiltrates in both femurs. (a) Coronal CT reformation in the soft-tissue window setting shows focal lesions with high signal density (75 HU) within the normal fatty marrow (black arrows). (b) The lesions can be missed in the corresponding CT reformation in the bone window setting. (c, d) The focal lesions exhibit a hypointense signal in the corresponding coronal T1w MRI scan and a hyperintense signal in the T1w fat-saturated scan (white arrows)
Fig. 5CT often underestimates tumor mass because on CT only myeloma infiltrates which have already led to osteolytic lesions can be detected. (a) The white arrows mark two osteolytic lesions in the 11th and 12th vertebral body on the sagittal CT reformation. The corresponding sagittal T1w MRI scan (b) and the STIR sequence (c) illustrate that every vertebral body is affected by myeloma
Fig. 6MRI illustration of a diffuse medullary infiltration pattern in myeloma using T1w (a) and STIR (b) sequences. It is characterized by decreased signal intensity of the bone marrow on T1w sequences (a) and a correspondingly increased signal on STIR (b) sequences. On T1w images (a), the signal intensity of the bone marrow is equal to the intervertebral disc and the muscle, which is known as the “bright disc” sign
Summary of the recommended technical parameters and accepted alternatives for the WBMRI examination in MM [51]
| Sequence | Orientation | FOV | Section thickness/ technical details | Aim/ target structure | Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1) T1w SE or TSE | Sagittal | wh.-sp. | 4–5 mm | Bone marrow | *, # |
| 2) STIR or T2w SE fs or T2w | Sagittal | wh.-sp. | 4–5 mm | Spinal canal, bone/soft-tissue edema | *, # |
| 3) T1w gradient-echo or T1w TSE | Sagittal/axial | wh.-bd. | 5 mm or thin, isotropic | Fat fraction maps | *, # |
| 4) DWI SE-EPI, ADC calc., 3D MIP recon. of highest b-value images | Axial | wh.-bd. | 5 mm contiguous sectioning/2 b-values (b50–100, b800–1000 s/mm2) | Bone marrow | *, # (additional b500–600 s/mm2) |
| 5) T2w TSE | Axial | wh.-bd. | 5 mm contiguous sectioning/multiple stations, preferably matching DWI | *optional, # | |
| 6) Local assessment | Individual | Symptomatic/known sites outside standard FOV | #optional | ||
Abbreviations: FOV: field of view; T1w: T1-weighted; SE: spin-echo; TSE: turbo spin-echo; wh.-sp.: whole spine; mm: millimeters; T2w: T2-weighted; GRE: gradient-echo; wh.-bd.: whole-body = vertex to knees; DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging; EPI: echo-planar imaging; calc.: calculation; ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient; MIP: maximum intensity projection; recon.: reconstruction; s: seconds; 3D: 3-dimensional; STIR: short tau inversion-recovery; fs: fat-saturated
° STIR or T2w FS preferred over T2w TSE, due to higher signal contrast
* Recommended as part of the core clinical protocol
# Recommended as part of the comprehensive protocol
Summary of the imaging recommendations of the IMWG [25] to establish the initial diagnosis and for the follow-up assessment of PCDs
| WBLDCT | WBMRI or MRI of the spine and pelvis | |
|---|---|---|
| Imaging recommendations to establish the initial diagnosis | ||
| MGUS | To exclude MM in suspected high-risk non-IgM MGUS1 | - Alternative, if CT is unavailable - Next step to evaluate equivocal findings of CT |
| SMM | Method of choice to detect osteolytic lesions** | To exclude focal lesions as myeloma-defining events, if CT is negative2 |
| Solitary plasmacytoma | – | In solitary |
| MM | Method of choice to detect and evaluate the extend of osteolytic lesions4 | Next step to exclude focal lesions as myeloma-defining events, if CT is negative and no other myeloma-defining event is present5 |
| Imaging recommendations for follow-up examinations and the assessment of treatment response | ||
| MGUS | Not indicated unless signs of progression to symptomatic disease occur | |
| SMM | - Repetition of same technique used at initial diagnosis at yearly intervals for at least 5 years depending on the risk factors - Additional alternating WBLDCT in cases with a high risk of progression to identify small osteolytic lesions | |
| Solitary plasmacytoma | Repetition of same technique used at initial diagnosis at yearly intervals for at least 5 years | |
| MM | - Repetition of same technique used at initial diagnosis to provide comparability - Follow-up imaging should be adapted in cases of progression, when the repeated and initially applied imaging technique does not reveal post-treatment imaging results that justify a change of treatment - WBLDCT when a relapse is suspected to evaluate the extent and dynamics of bone destruction as the most clinically relevant parameter6 | |
Abbreviations: WBLDCT: whole-body low-dose computed tomography; WBMRI: whole-body magnetic resonance imaging; MGUS: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is a plasma cell dyscrasia in which plasma cells or other types of antibody-producing cells secrete a myeloma protein, i.e., an abnormal antibody, into the blood; this abnormal protein is usually found during standard laboratory blood or urine tests; SMM: smoldering multiple myeloma (also sometimes known as asymptomatic myeloma) is an early form of myeloma, which usually progresses to active myeloma, but at a slow rate. In smoldering myeloma, abnormal cells can be detected in the bone marrow, and abnormal protein can be detected in the blood and/or urine; MM: multiple myeloma
1 Additional PET/CT if WBLDCT is positive
2 PET/CT can be used as an alternative to WBLDCT and instead of WBMRI if the latter is unavailable or in cases with specific contraindications
3 PET/CT in patients with solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma and as an alternative in solitary bone plasmacytoma, if MRI is unavailable
4 PET/CT can be used as an alternative to WBLDCT
5 PET/CT can be used as an alternative to MRI if the latter is unavailable or in cases with specific contraindications, and it is the preferred imaging method to generate a baseline for follow-up assessments
6 Yearly follow-ups are recommended for patients with residual lesions detected by PET/CT because of the high risk of early progression
Summary and comparison of the main features, advantages and limitations of CT and MRI in MM and other PCDs
| CT | MRI | |
|---|---|---|
| Main features | - Morphological imaging in clinical routine, functional imaging (DECT) only in study settings - Highest sensitivity for the detection of osteolytic bone lesions - Visualization of bone marrow infiltration in the extremities - Gold standard for the assessment of spinal stability in vertebral fractures - Necessary/supportive for the planning of radiotherapy, surgeries and biopsies - Valuable for the assessment of treatment response and relapse during follow-up to evaluate the extent and dynamics of bone destruction as the most clinically relevant parameter | - Morphological and functional imaging (DWI) in clinical routine - Additional functional imaging options (DCE, chemical shift with fat fraction maps) in study settings - Highest sensitivity for the detection of bone marrow infiltration - Depiction of medullary infiltration pattern - Depiction of non-osteolytic bone marrow infiltration prior to bone destruction - Gold standard for the assessment of spinal cord and nerve root compression - Gold standard for the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures - Prognostic relevance - Possible value for the assessment of treatment response and relapse during follow-up when functional imaging (DWI) is applied |
| Technical advantages | - Better availability - Shorter acquisition time - Higher patient comfort - Lower costs - No administration of contrast agents required for evaluation of MBD | No radiation exposure |
| Technical limitations | - Radiation exposure | - Limited availability - Longer acquisition time - Patient discomfort, may be significant in patients with claustrophobia, or older metal implants |
| Administration of contrast agents | - Adverse impact on kidney function in patients with preexistent renal impairment - Possible allergic reactions - Possible thyrotoxicosis | - Adverse impact on kidney function in patients with preexistent renal impairment - Disassociation and deposition of linear GBCAs |
Abbreviations: CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; DECT: dual-energy computed tomography; DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging; DCE: dynamic contrast-enhanced; GBCAs: gadolinium-based contrast agents