| Literature DB >> 31162104 |
Jens Hillengass1, Saad Usmani2, S Vincent Rajkumar3, Brian G M Durie4, María-Victoria Mateos5, Sagar Lonial6, Cristina Joao7, Kenneth C Anderson8, Ramón García-Sanz9, Eloísa Riva10, Juan Du11, Niels van de Donk12, Jesús G Berdeja13, Evangelos Terpos14, Elena Zamagni15, Robert A Kyle16, Jesús San Miguel17, Hartmut Goldschmidt18, Sergio Giralt19, Shaji Kumar20, Noopur Raje21, Heinz Ludwig22, Enrique Ocio5, Rik Schots23, Hermann Einsele24, Fredrik Schjesvold25, Wen-Ming Chen26, Niels Abildgaard27, Brea C Lipe28, Dominik Dytfeld29, Baldeep Mona Wirk30, Matthew Drake31, Michele Cavo15, Juan José Lahuerta32, Suzanne Lentzsch33.
Abstract
Recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma have increased the need for accurate diagnosis of the disease. The detection of bone and bone marrow lesions is crucial in the investigation of multiple myeloma and often dictates the decision to start treatment. Furthermore, detection of minimal residual disease is important for prognosis determination and treatment planning, and it has underscored an unmet need for sensitive imaging methods that accurately assess patient response to multiple myeloma treatment. Low-dose whole-body CT has increased sensitivity compared with conventional skeletal survey in the detection of bone disease, which can reveal information leading to changes in therapy and disease management that could prevent or delay the onset of clinically significant morbidity and mortality as a result of skeletal-related events. Given the multiple options available for the detection of bone and bone marrow lesions, ranging from conventional skeletal survey to whole-body CT, PET/CT, and MRI, the International Myeloma Working Group decided to establish guidelines on optimal use of imaging methods at different disease stages. These recommendations on imaging within and outside of clinical trials will help standardise imaging for monoclonal plasma cell disorders worldwide to allow the comparison of results and the unification of treatment approaches for multiple myeloma.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31162104 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30309-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Oncol ISSN: 1470-2045 Impact factor: 41.316