Literature DB >> 28368259

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group.

Michele Cavo1, Evangelos Terpos2, Cristina Nanni3, Philippe Moreau4, Suzanne Lentzsch5, Sonja Zweegman6, Jens Hillengass7, Monika Engelhardt8, Saad Z Usmani9, David H Vesole10, Jesus San-Miguel11, Shaji K Kumar12, Paul G Richardson13, Joseph R Mikhael14, Fernando Leal da Costa15, Meletios-Athanassios Dimopoulos16, Chiara Zingaretti17, Niels Abildgaard18, Hartmut Goldschmidt7, Robert Z Orlowski19, Wee Joo Chng20, Hermann Einsele21, Sagar Lonial22, Bart Barlogie23, Kenneth C Anderson13, S Vincent Rajkumar12, Brian G M Durie24, Elena Zamagni25.   

Abstract

The International Myeloma Working Group consensus aimed to provide recommendations for the optimal use of 18fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders, including smouldering multiple myeloma and solitary plasmacytoma. 18F-FDG PET/CT can be considered a valuable tool for the work-up of patients with both newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma because it assesses bone damage with relatively high sensitivity and specificity, and detects extramedullary sites of proliferating clonal plasma cells while providing important prognostic information. The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT is mandatory to confirm a suspected diagnosis of solitary plasmacytoma, provided that whole-body MRI is unable to be performed, and to distinguish between smouldering and active multiple myeloma, if whole-body X-ray (WBXR) is negative and whole-body MRI is unavailable. Based on the ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to distinguish between metabolically active and inactive disease, this technique is now the preferred functional imaging modality to evaluate and to monitor the effect of therapy on myeloma-cell metabolism. Changes in FDG avidity can provide an earlier evaluation of response to therapy compared to MRI scans, and can predict outcomes, particularly for patients who are eligible to receive autologous stem-cell transplantation. 18F-FDG PET/CT can be coupled with sensitive bone marrow-based techniques to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) inside and outside the bone marrow, helping to identify those patients who are defined as having imaging MRD negativity.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28368259     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30189-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  130 in total

1.  ImmunoPET imaging of multiple myeloma with [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-Nb1053.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yumei Chen; Yun Nan Hou; Qiufang Liu; Di Zhang; Haitao Zhao; You Zhang; Shuxian An; Lianghua Li; Jian Hou; Gang Huang; Jianjun Liu; Yong Juan Zhao; Weijun Wei
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Case-based roundtable on treatment approach for young, fit, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Sergio Giralt; Eric Seifter
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

3.  Prognostic significance of bone marrow abnormalities in the appendicular skeleton of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Kosei Matsue; Hiroki Kobayashi; Yuya Matsue; Yoshiaki Abe; Kentaro Narita; Akihiro Kitadate; Masami Takeuchi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-05-08

4.  Value of low-dose whole-body CT in the management of patients with multiple myeloma and precursor states.

Authors:  F Joseph Simeone; Joel P Harvey; Andrew J Yee; Elizabeth K O'Donnell; Noopur S Raje; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Copper 64-labeled daratumumab as a PET/CT imaging tracer for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Enrico Caserta; Junie Chea; Megan Minnix; Erasmus K Poku; Domenico Viola; Steven Vonderfecht; Paul Yazaki; Desiree Crow; Jihane Khalife; James F Sanchez; Joycelynne M Palmer; Susanta Hui; Nadia Carlesso; Jonathan Keats; Young Kim; Ralf Buettner; Guido Marcucci; Steven Rosen; John Shively; David Colcher; Amrita Krishnan; Flavia Pichiorri
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Incidence of spinal disease and role of spinal radiotherapy in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A M Sharma; M Sackett; D Bueddefeld; P Lambert; A Dubey; V Wadhwa; R Kotb; N Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Imaging in myeloma with focus on advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Tara Barwick; Laure Bretsztajn; Kathryn Wallitt; Dimitri Amiras; Andrea Rockall; Christina Messiou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Myeloma and Bone Disease.

Authors:  Cristina Panaroni; Andrew J Yee; Noopur S Raje
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  Comprehensive characterization of circulating and bone marrow-derived multiple myeloma cells at minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Johannes M Waldschmidt; Praveen Anand; Birgit Knoechel; Jens G Lohr
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.851

10.  [Focal lesions in whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma : Quantification of tumor mass and correlation with disease-related parameters and prognosis].

Authors:  S C Brandelik; J Krzykalla; T Hielscher; J Hillengass; J K Kloth; H U Kauczor; M A Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.