Literature DB >> 31345776

Risk of diabetes-associated diseases in subgroups of patients with recent-onset diabetes: a 5-year follow-up study.

Oana P Zaharia1, Klaus Strassburger2, Alexander Strom1, Gidon J Bönhof1, Yanislava Karusheva1, Sofia Antoniou3, Kálmán Bódis3, Daniel F Markgraf1, Volker Burkart1, Karsten Müssig1, Jong-Hee Hwang1, Olof Asplund4, Leif Groop4, Emma Ahlqvist4, Jochen Seissler5, Peter Nawroth6, Stefan Kopf6, Sebastian M Schmid7, Michael Stumvoll8, Andreas F H Pfeiffer9, Stefan Kabisch9, Sergey Tselmin10, Hans U Häring11, Dan Ziegler3, Oliver Kuss12, Julia Szendroedi3, Michael Roden13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cluster analyses have proposed different diabetes phenotypes using age, BMI, glycaemia, homoeostasis model estimates, and islet autoantibodies. We tested whether comprehensive phenotyping validates and further characterises these clusters at diagnosis and whether relevant diabetes-related complications differ among these clusters, during 5-years of follow-up.
METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed type 1 or type 2 diabetes in the German Diabetes Study underwent comprehensive phenotyping and assessment of laboratory variables. Insulin sensitivity was assessed using hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamps, hepatocellular lipid content using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, hepatic fibrosis using non-invasive scores, and peripheral and autonomic neuropathy using functional and clinical criteria. Patients were reassessed after 5 years. The German Diabetes Study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01055093, and is ongoing.
FINDINGS: 1105 patients were classified at baseline into five clusters, with 386 (35%) assigned to mild age-related diabetes (MARD), 323 (29%) to mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD), 247 (22%) to severe autoimmune diabetes (SAID), 121 (11%) to severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD), and 28 (3%) to severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD). At 5-year follow-up, 367 patients were reassessed, 128 (35%) with MARD, 106 (29%) with MOD, 88 (24%) with SAID, 35 (10%) with SIRD, and ten (3%) with SIDD. Whole-body insulin sensitivity was lowest in patients with SIRD at baseline (mean 4·3 mg/kg per min [SD 2·0]) compared with those with SAID (8·4 mg/kg per min [3·2]; p<0·0001), MARD (7·5 mg/kg per min [2·5]; p<0·0001), MOD (6·6 mg/kg per min [2·6]; p=0·0011), and SIDD (5·5 mg/kg per min [2·4]; p=0·0035). The fasting adipose-tissue insulin resistance index at baseline was highest in patients with SIRD (median 15·6 [IQR 9·3-20·9]) and MOD (11·6 [7·4-17·9]) compared with those with MARD (6·0 [3·9-10·3]; both p<0·0001) and SAID (6·0 [3·0-9·5]; both p<0·0001). In patients with newly diagnosed diabetes, hepatocellular lipid content was highest at baseline in patients assigned to the SIRD cluster (median 19% [IQR 11-22]) compared with all other clusters (7% [2-15] for MOD, p=0·00052; 5% [2-11] for MARD, p<0·0001; 2% [0-13] for SIDD, p=0·0083; and 1% [0-3] for SAID, p<0·0001), even after adjustments for baseline medication. Accordingly, hepatic fibrosis at 5-year follow-up was more prevalent in patients with SIRD (n=7 [26%]) than in patients with SAID (n=5 [7%], p=0·0011), MARD (n=12 [12%], p=0·012), MOD (n=13 [15%], p=0·050), and SIDD (n=0 [0%], p value not available). Confirmed diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy was more prevalent at baseline in patients with SIDD (n=9 [36%]) compared with patients with SAID (n=10 [5%], p<0·0001), MARD (n=39 [15%], p=0·00066), MOD (n=26 [11%], p<0·0001), and SIRD (n=10 [17%], p<0·0001).
INTERPRETATION: Cluster analysis can characterise cohorts with different degrees of whole-body and adipose-tissue insulin resistance. Specific diabetes clusters show different prevalence of diabetes complications at early stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetic neuropathy. These findings could help improve targeted prevention and treatment and enable precision medicine for diabetes and its comorbidities. FUNDING: German Diabetes Center, German Federal Ministry of Health, Ministry of Culture and Science of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, German Diabetes Association, German Center for Diabetes Research, Research Network SFB 1116 of the German Research Foundation, and Schmutzler Stiftung.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31345776     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30187-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol        ISSN: 2213-8587            Impact factor:   32.069


  81 in total

Review 1.  Diabetic Neuropathy: a Critical, Narrative Review of Published Data from 2019.

Authors:  Ameet S Nagpal; Jennifer Leet; Kaitlyn Egan; Rudy Garza
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2021-02-25

2.  Hungry for your alanine: when liver depends on muscle proteolysis.

Authors:  Theresia Sarabhai; Michael Roden
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  "H" for Heterogeneity in the Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Pieralice Silvia; Zampetti Simona; Maddaloni Ernesto; Buzzetti Raffaella
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Pancreatic β-cells in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: different pathways to failure.

Authors:  Décio L Eizirik; Lorenzo Pasquali; Miriam Cnop
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  The Need for Precision Medicine to be Applied to Diabetes.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Jose C Florez; Michael German; Alexander Fleming
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-06

6.  Precision medicine in diabetes: a Consensus Report from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Wendy K Chung; Karel Erion; Jose C Florez; Andrew T Hattersley; Marie-France Hivert; Christine G Lee; Mark I McCarthy; John J Nolan; Jill M Norris; Ewan R Pearson; Louis Philipson; Allison T McElvaine; William T Cefalu; Stephen S Rich; Paul W Franks
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 7.  Defining the underlying defect in insulin action in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Thiago M Batista; Nida Haider; C Ronald Kahn
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 8.  The complex link between NAFLD and type 2 diabetes mellitus - mechanisms and treatments.

Authors:  Giovanni Targher; Kathleen E Corey; Christopher D Byrne; Michael Roden
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Association of Diabetes Subgroups With Race/Ethnicity, Risk Factor Burden and Complications: The MASALA and MESA Studies.

Authors:  Michael P Bancks; Alain G Bertoni; Mercedes Carnethon; Haiying Chen; Mary Frances Cotch; Unjali P Gujral; David Herrington; Alka M Kanaya; Moyses Szklo; Dhananjay Vaidya; Namratha R Kandula
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 10.  Lipid and glucose metabolism in white adipocytes: pathways, dysfunction and therapeutics.

Authors:  Pauline Morigny; Jeremie Boucher; Peter Arner; Dominique Langin
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 43.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.