Literature DB >> 25595425

How tibiofemoral alignment and contact locations affect predictions of medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces.

Zachary F Lerner1, Matthew S DeMers2, Scott L Delp2, Raymond C Browning3.   

Abstract

Understanding degeneration of biological and prosthetic knee joints requires knowledge of the in-vivo loading environment during activities of daily living. Musculoskeletal models can estimate medial/lateral tibiofemoral compartment contact forces, yet anthropometric differences between individuals make accurate predictions challenging. We developed a full-body OpenSim musculoskeletal model with a knee joint that incorporates subject-specific tibiofemoral alignment (i.e. knee varus-valgus) and geometry (i.e. contact locations). We tested the accuracy of our model and determined the importance of these subject-specific parameters by comparing estimated to measured medial and lateral contact forces during walking in an individual with an instrumented knee replacement and post-operative genu valgum (6°). The errors in the predictions of the first peak medial and lateral contact force were 12.4% and 11.9%, respectively, for a model with subject-specific tibiofemoral alignment and contact locations determined through radiographic analysis, vs. 63.1% and 42.0%, respectively, for a model with generic parameters. We found that each degree of tibiofemoral alignment deviation altered the first peak medial compartment contact force by 51N (r(2)=0.99), while each millimeter of medial-lateral translation of the compartment contact point locations altered the first peak medial compartment contact force by 41N (r(2)=0.99). The model, available at www.simtk.org/home/med-lat-knee/, enables the specification of subject-specific joint alignment and compartment contact locations to more accurately estimate medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces in individuals with non-neutral alignment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Joint loading; Musculoskeletal modeling; Osteoarthritis; Tibiofemoral contact force; Walking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25595425      PMCID: PMC4330122          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  29 in total

1.  The knee adduction moment during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis is more closely correlated with static alignment than radiographic disease severity, toe out angle and pain.

Authors:  D E Hurwitz; A B Ryals; J P Case; J A Block; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

3.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures.

Authors:  S L Delp; J P Loan; M G Hoy; F E Zajac; E L Topp; J M Rosen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L Sharma; J Song; D T Felson; S Cahue; E Shamiyeh; D D Dunlop
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Multibody dynamic simulation of knee contact mechanics.

Authors:  Yanhong Bei; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Knee adduction moment, serum hyaluronan level, and disease severity in medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L Sharma; D E Hurwitz; E J Thonar; J A Sum; M E Lenz; D D Dunlop; T J Schnitzer; G Kirwan-Mellis; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-07

7.  Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  D Cooke; A Scudamore; J Li; U Wyss; T Bryant; P Costigan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 8.  The role of muscles in joint adaptation and degeneration.

Authors:  W Herzog; D Longino; A Clark
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  The effects of walking speed on tibiofemoral loading estimated via musculoskeletal modeling.

Authors:  Zachary F Lerner; Derek J Haight; Matthew S DeMers; Wayne J Board; Raymond C Browning
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 1.833

10.  Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival.

Authors:  M A Ritter; P M Faris; E M Keating; J B Meding
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  35 in total

1.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Casey A Myers; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The Influence of Component Alignment and Ligament Properties on Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Rachel L Lenhart; Jarred Kaiser; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Improving Musculoskeletal Model Scaling Using an Anatomical Atlas: The Importance of Gender and Anthropometric Similarity to Quantify Joint Reaction Forces.

Authors:  Ziyun Ding; Chui K Tsang; Daniel Nolte; Angela E Kedgley; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  The effect of articular geometry features identified using statistical shape modelling on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Allison L Clouthier; Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Darryl G Thelen; Kevin J Deluzio; Michael J Rainbow
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Real-time inverse kinematics and inverse dynamics for lower limb applications using OpenSim.

Authors:  C Pizzolato; M Reggiani; L Modenese; D G Lloyd
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Biofeedback for Gait Retraining Based on Real-Time Estimation of Tibiofemoral Joint Contact Forces.

Authors:  Claudio Pizzolato; Monica Reggiani; David J Saxby; Elena Ceseracciu; Luca Modenese; David G Lloyd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  The effects of pediatric obesity on patellofemoral joint contact force during walking.

Authors:  Namwoong Kim; Raymond C Browning; Zachary F Lerner
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Increases in tibial force imbalance but not changes in tibiofemoral laxities are caused by varus-valgus malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned TKA.

Authors:  Jeremy Riley; Joshua D Roth; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Adaptive Ankle Resistance from a Wearable Robotic Device to Improve Muscle Recruitment in Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Benjamin C Conner; Jason Luque; Zachary F Lerner
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Compressive and shear hip joint contact forces are affected by pediatric obesity during walking.

Authors:  Zachary F Lerner; Raymond C Browning
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.