Literature DB >> 25481833

Burden of illness for osteoporotic fractures compared with other serious diseases among postmenopausal women in the United States.

Andrea Singer1, Alex Exuzides2, Leslie Spangler3, Cynthia O'Malley3, Chris Colby4, Karissa Johnston4, Irene Agodoa3, Jessica Baker4, Risa Kagan5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide a national estimate of the incidence of hospitalizations due to osteoporotic fractures (OFs) in women; compare this with the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and breast cancer; and assess temporal trends in the incidence and length of hospitalizations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included all women 55 years and older at the time of admission, admitted to a hospital participating in the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample for an outcome of interest. We performed a retrospective analysis of hospitalizations for OFs (hip, forearm, spine, pelvis, distal femur, wrist, and humerus), MI, stroke, or breast cancer, using the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2000-2011.
RESULTS: From 2000 to 2011, there were 4.9 million hospitalizations for OF, 2.9 million for MI, 3.0 million for stroke, and 0.7 million for breast cancer. Osteoporotic fractures accounted for more than 40% of the hospitalizations in these 4 outcomes, with an age-adjusted rate of 1124 admissions per 100,000 person-years. In comparison, MI, stroke, and breast cancer had age-adjusted incidence rates of 668, 687, and 151 admissions per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The annual total population facility-related hospital cost was highest for hospitalizations due to OFs ($5.1 billion), followed by MI ($4.3 billion), stroke ($3.0 billion), and breast cancer ($0.5 billion).
CONCLUSION: These data provide evidence that in US women 55 years and older, the hospitalization burden of OFs and population facility-related hospital cost is greater than that of MI, stroke, or breast cancer. Prioritization of bone health and supporting programs such as fracture liaison services is needed to reduce this substantial burden.
Copyright © 2015 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25481833     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  79 in total

1.  The American Orthopaedic Association's Own the Bone® database: a national quality improvement project for the treatment of bone health in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  B C Carlson; W A Robinson; N R Wanderman; A N Nassr; P M Huddleston; M J Yaszemski; B L Currier; K J Jeray; K L Kirk; A D Bunta; S Murphy; B Patel; C M Watkins; D L Sietsema; B J Edwards; L L Tosi; P A Anderson; B A Freedman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The impact of osteoporotic fractures compared with other health conditions in older adults living in Virginia, United States.

Authors:  T D Cunningham; B C Martin; S C DeShields; C C Romero
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  The role of radiography in the study of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Daniel López Zúñiga
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-12

4.  Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA.

Authors:  S L Solimeo; V-T T Nguyen; S W Edmonds; Y Lou; D W Roblin; K G Saag; P Cram; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Exploring Racial, Gender, and Insurance Disparities in Patients with Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Sarah C DeShields; Cynthia C Romero; Tina D Cunningham
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-12

6.  Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway.

Authors:  M Hoff; H E Meyer; S Skurtveit; A Langhammer; A J Søgaard; U Syversen; A Dhainaut; E Skovlund; B Abrahamsen; B Schei
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A comparison of electronic and manual fracture risk assessment tools in screening elderly male US veterans at risk for osteoporosis.

Authors:  S T Williams; P T Lawrence; K L Miller; J L Crook; J LaFleur; G W Cannon; R E Nelson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Prevalence of malnutrition in a cohort of 509 patients with acute hip fracture: the importance of a comprehensive assessment.

Authors:  M Díaz de Bustamante; T Alarcón; R Menéndez-Colino; R Ramírez-Martín; Á Otero; J I González-Montalvo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  A meta-analysis of breastfeeding and osteoporotic fracture risk in the females.

Authors:  X Duan; J Wang; X Jiang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Prevalence and risk of fracture diagnoses in women across the adult life span: a national cross-sectional study.

Authors:  P Y Chang; F S Saechao; J Lee; S G Haskell; S M Frayne; J S Lee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.