Literature DB >> 12670137

Internal fracture fixation in patients with osteoporosis.

Charles N Cornell1.   

Abstract

Because of the decreased holding power of plate-and-screw fixation in osteoporotic bone fractures, internal fixation can have a high failure rate, ranging from 10% to 25%. Screws placed into cortical bone have better resistance to pullout than do those placed into adjacent trabecular bone. Plates should not be used to bridge unstable regions of bony comminution in osteoporotic patients. Fixation stability is optimized by securing stable bone contact across the fracture site and by placing screws both as close to and as far from the fracture as possible. Intentional shortening can improve stability and load sharing of the fracture construct. Structural bone graft or other types of fillers can be used to fill voids when comminution prevents stable contact. Load-sharing fixation devices such as the sliding hip screw, intramedullary nail, antiglide plate, and tension band constructs are better alternatives for osteoporotic metaphyseal locations. Proper planning is essential for improved fracture fixation in this high-risk patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12670137     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200303000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  34 in total

Review 1.  Role of sclerostin in bone and cartilage and its potential as a therapeutic target in bone diseases.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  How pilot-hole size affects bone-screw pullout strength in human cadaveric cancellous bone.

Authors:  Mark Steeves; Craig Stone; John Mogaard; Stephanie Byrne
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Sclerostin and skeletal health.

Authors:  Maryam Sharifi; Lisa Ereifej; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 4.  Biomaterial scaffolds for treating osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Julie A Sterling; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Acetabular fractures labelled poor surgical choices: Analysis of operative outcome.

Authors:  Ravi Kumar Gupta; Nipun Jindal; Manish Pruthi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-03-21

Review 6.  Currents of plate osteosynthesis in osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Kalliopi Lampropoulou-Adamidou; Panagiotis K Karampinas; Efstathios Chronopoulos; John Vlamis; Demetrios S Korres
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-03-31

Review 7.  The potential of gene therapy for fracture healing in osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Egermann; E Schneider; C H Evans; A W Baltzer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Relative stability of conventional and locked plating fixation in a model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis.

Authors:  Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Josef Doornink; Steven M Madey; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 9.  Animal models for fracture treatment in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Marcus Egermann; J Goldhahn; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Optimizing Hybrid Plate Fixation with a Locked, Oblique End Screw in Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Aaron Wynkoop; Osy Ndubaku; Paul M Charpentier; Jeffrey B Peck; Norman E Walter; Patrick Atkinson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.