Literature DB >> 3401696

Lexical decision and naming asymmetries: influence of response selection and response bias.

C Chiarello1, S Nuding, A Pollock.   

Abstract

Signal detection measures were used to evaluate the effects of several response variables (manual vs. vocal, Go-NoGo vs. Yes-No) on lexical decision asymmetries. An unvarying right visual field advantage in discriminability (d') was observed in each condition. However, response criteria (beta) varied over visual fields and conditions. Naming and lexical decision were shown to have equivalent asymmetries when the effects of response bias are removed. The results indicate that postaccess decision processes make important contributions to lexical decision asymmetries.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3401696     DOI： 10.1016/0093-934x(88)90141-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN： 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  11 in total

1.  Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Eva Rosa; Consolación Gómez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks.

Authors:  Paul D Siakaluk; Lori Buchanan; Chris Westbury
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

3.  A model of the go/no-go task.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Roger Ratcliff; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

4.  Hemisphericsymmetries in the identification of band-pass filtered letters Reply to Christman et al. (1997).

Authors:  D H Peterzell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

5.  Nominal and physical decision criteria in same-different judgments.

Authors:  Z Eviatar; E Zaidel; T Wickens
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-07

6.  The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A right visual field advantage for visual processing of manipulable objects.

Authors:  Frank E Garcea; Jorge Almeida; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Response requirements affect offside judgments in football (soccer).

Authors:  Frowin Fasold; Peter Wühr; Daniel Memmert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-01

9.  Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Abubaker A A Almabruk; Kevin B Paterson; Victoria McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Grasping with the eyes: the role of elongation in visual recognition of manipulable objects.

Authors:  Jorge Almeida; Bradford Z Mahon; Veronica Zapater-Raberov; Aleksandra Dziuba; Tiago Cabaço; J Frederico Marques; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.