Literature DB >> 28766262

Response requirements affect offside judgments in football (soccer).

Frowin Fasold1, Peter Wühr2, Daniel Memmert3.   

Abstract

Judging offside in football represents a typical go-nogo task (offside-raising the flag, no offside-no response). Nevertheless, several studies involved two-choice tasks (e.g. offside-press key A, no offside-press key B) to investigate potential sources of errors in offside situations. While go-nogo and choice-response tasks are commonly used in experimental psychology, response preferences may differ between the two tasks. Therefore, we investigated the impact of response requirements on offside judgments in a sample of male participants without experience in professional refereeing. Each participant judged displays of potential offside situations in a go-nogo condition and in a two-choice condition. The results show that response requirements affected the response bias of the participants and suggest that go-nogo requirements increase the preference for the positive response (i.e. the offside response) as compared to the two-choice task. We discuss both methodological and theoretical implications of this finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28766262     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0902-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  20 in total

1.  Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Eva Rosa; Consolación Gómez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  Flag errors in soccer games: the flash-lag effect brought to real life.

Authors:  Marcus Vinicius C Baldo; Ronald D Ranvaud; Edgard Morya
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Errors in judging 'offside' in football.

Authors:  R R Oudejans; R Verheijen; F C Bakker; J C Gerrits; M Steinbrückner; P J Beek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Offside decision making of assistant referees in the English Premier League: impact of physical and perceptual-cognitive factors on match performance.

Authors:  Peter Catteeuw; Bart Gilis; Johan Wagemans; Werner Helsen
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  Visual scan patterns and decision-making skills of expert assistant referees in offside situations.

Authors:  Peter Catteeuw; Werner Helsen; Bart Gilis; Evelien Van Roie; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.016

6.  Can the human eye detect an offside position during a football match?

Authors:  Francisco Belda Maruenda
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-12-18

7.  Errors in judging "offside" in association football: test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis.

Authors:  Werner Helsen; Bart Gilis; Matthew Weston
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.337

8.  A model of the go/no-go task.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Roger Ratcliff; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

9.  Interpretation and application of the offside law by expert assistant referees: perception of spatial positions in complex dynamic events on and off the field.

Authors:  Bart Gilis; Werner Helsen; Peter Catteeuw; Evelien Van Roie; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  Offside decisions by expert assistant referees in association football: Perception and recall of spatial positions in complex dynamic events.

Authors:  Bart Gilis; Werner Helsen; Peter Catteeuw; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2008-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.