Literature DB >> 3400659

Measurement of spinal or peripheral bone mass to estimate early postmenopausal bone loss?

B J Riis1, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

This report presents data from 153 healthy, early postmenopausal women who were randomly allocated to two years of treatment with estrogen or placebo. Bone mineral content in the forearms was measured by single-photon absorptiometry, and bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and total-body bone mineral by dual-photon absorptiometry, before and after one and two years of treatment. At the end of the two years, there were highly significant differences of 6 to 7 percent between the estrogen and the placebo groups at all sites measured. The range of the changes of the spine measurement was twice that of the forearm and total-body measurements. It is concluded that measurement of the forearm by single-photon absorptiometry is superior to measurement of the spine by dual-photon absorptiometry both in clinical studies and in the individual patient for detecting estrogen-dependent bone loss and its treatment by estrogen replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3400659     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90099-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  13 in total

1.  The effect of bilateral oophorectomy on bone mineral density.

Authors:  Alper Hayirlioglu; Hüsnü Gökaslan; Nurten Andaç
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Which bone to measure?

Authors:  A G Need; B E Nordin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Estrogens, bone loss and preservation.

Authors:  C Christiansen; R Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Long-term precision of bone loss rate measurements among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J W Davis; P D Ross; R D Wasnich; C J MacLean; J M Vogel
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Metacarpal bone mass in normal and osteoporotic Japanese women using computed X-ray densitometry.

Authors:  C Matsumoto; K Kushida; K Yamazaki; K Imose; T Inoue
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Different rates of forearm bone loss in healthy women with early or late menopause.

Authors:  G Luisetto; M Zangari; F Bottega; F Peccolo; P Galuppo; A Nardi; D Ziliotto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Non-responders to hormone replacement therapy for the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss: do they exist?

Authors:  C Hassager; S B Jensen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Effect of salcatonin given intranasally on early postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  K Overgaard; B J Riis; C Christiansen; M A Hansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-19

9.  Correlations between bone mineral density and demographic, lifestyle, and biochemical variables in community-dwelling Japanese women 69 years of age and over.

Authors:  K Nakamura; T Saito; T Nishiwaki; K Ueno; M Nashimoto; Y Okuda; Y Tsuchiya; R Oshiki; K Muto; M Yamamoto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Discriminatory ability of bone mass measurements (SPA and DEXA) for fractures in elderly postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K Overgaard; M A Hansen; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.