Literature DB >> 33994703

A meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of syndesmotic injury treated with metal screw, dynamic fixation, and bioabsorbable screw.

Jiayong Liu1, Gautam Pathak1, Mihir Joshi1, Kyle Andrews1, Joseph Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently there is significant controversy regarding which fixation method is most effective for the treatment of syndesmotic ankle injuries.
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was designed to compare the metal screw, dynamic, and bioabsorbable screw fixation methods for treatment of syndesmotic ankle injuries.
METHODS: An online search for RCT and prospective/retrospective clinical comparison studies between January 1998 and December 2018 on syndesmotic fixation was conducted. The main parameters collected include functional scores, mean time to full weightbearing, postoperative tibiofibular clear spaces, tibiofibular overlap, medial clear spaces, and complication rates. Statistical analysis was conducted using One Way ANOVAs and Chi-Squared tests using Review Manager and Excel.
RESULTS: A total of 18 comparison studies, with 509 patients in the metal screw fixation group, 275 in the dynamic fixation group, and 226 in the bioabsorbable screw fixation group, were included in this meta-analysis. For the metal screw group, dynamic fixation group, and bioabsorbable screw group, the mean AOFAS score were 83.8, 87.2, and 84.3 (p < 0.05), the mean time to full weightbearing were 9.0 weeks, 7.2 weeks, and 7.7 weeks (p < 0.05), and the complication rates were 0.19, 0.09, and 0.19, respectively (p < 0.05). Similarly, the mean postoperative TFCS were 4.85, 3.87, and 5.70 for the metal screw group, dynamic fixation group, and bioabsorbable screw fixation group, respectively (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The dynamic fixation group was found to have significantly improved functional scores, lower complication rates, and lower mean time to full weight-bearing than the metal screw and bioabsorbable screw fixation methods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis of all relevant Level 1-3 Evidence Comparative Studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioabsorbable syndesmotic screw; Meta-analysis; Metal syndesmotic screw; Suture button; Syndesmotic ankle injuries; TightRope

Year:  2021        PMID: 33994703      PMCID: PMC8093815          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  23 in total

1.  [Effectiveness comparison of flexible fixation and rigid fixation in treatment of ankle pronation-external rotation fractures with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis].

Authors:  Yuewei Li; Minghui Zhang; Xiaorong Li; Xiaoyong Chen; Jianlong Deng
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2017-07-15

2.  Use of tightrope fixation in ankle syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  Julian Maempel; Anthony Ward; Tim Chesser; Michael Kelly
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2014

3.  Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction.

Authors:  Gohar A Naqvi; Patricia Cunningham; Bernadette Lynch; Rose Galvin; Nasir Awan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Randomized Trial Comparing Suture Button with Single Syndesmotic Screw for Syndesmosis Injury.

Authors:  Mette Renate Andersen; Frede Frihagen; Johan Castberg Hellund; Jan Erik Madsen; Wender Figved
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Evaluation of Reduction Accuracy of Suture-Button and Screw Fixation Techniques for Syndesmotic Injuries.

Authors:  Onur Kocadal; Mehmet Yucel; Murad Pepe; Ertugrul Aksahin; Cem Nuri Aktekin
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Comparison of screw fixation with elastic fixation methods in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Mustafa Seyhan; Ferdi Donmez; Mahir Mahirogullari; Selami Cakmak; Serhat Mutlu; Olcay Guler
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography.

Authors:  Tero Kortekangas; Olli Savola; Tapio Flinkkilä; Sannamari Lepojärvi; Simo Nortunen; Pasi Ohtonen; Jani Katisko; Harri Pakarinen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Outcomes of operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures: a comparison of metallic and biodegradable implants.

Authors:  Jung Ho Noh; Young Hak Roh; Bo Gyu Yang; Seong Wan Kim; Jun Suk Lee; Moo Kyung Oh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  [Effectiveness comparison between absorbable and metallic screws for treatment of tibiofibular syndesmotic disruptions].

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Yue Wang; Xiaoming Tang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2013-12

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.