Literature DB >> 27535086

Evaluation of Reduction Accuracy of Suture-Button and Screw Fixation Techniques for Syndesmotic Injuries.

Onur Kocadal1, Mehmet Yucel2, Murad Pepe3, Ertugrul Aksahin4, Cem Nuri Aktekin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among the most important predictors of functional results of treatment of syndesmotic injuries is the accurate restoration of the syndesmotic space. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reduction performance of screw fixation and suture-button techniques using images obtained from computed tomography (CT) scans.
METHODS: Patients at or below 65 years who were treated with screw or suture-button fixation for syndesmotic injuries accompanying ankle fractures between January 2012 and March 2015 were retrospectively reviewed in our regional trauma unit. A total of 52 patients were included in the present study. Fixation was performed with syndesmotic screws in 26 patients and suture-button fixation in 26 patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the fixation methods. Postoperative CT scans were used for radiologic evaluation. Four parameters (anteroposterior reduction, rotational reduction, the cross-sectional syndesmotic area, and the distal tibiofibular volumes) were taken into consideration for the radiologic assessment. Functional evaluation of patients was done using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale at the final follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 16.7 ± 11.0 months, and the mean age was 44.1 ± 13.2.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in the degree of fibular rotation (P = .03) and an increase in the upper syndesmotic area (P = .006) compared with the contralateral limb in the screw fixation group. In the suture-button fixation group, there was a statistically significant increase in the lower syndesmotic area (P = .02) and distal tibiofibular volumes (P = .04) compared with the contralateral limbs. The mean AOFAS scores were 88.4 ± 9.2 and 86.1 ± 14.0 in the suture-button fixation and screw fixation group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the functional ankle joint scores between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Although the functional outcomes were similar, the restoration of the fibular rotation in the treatment of syndesmotic injuries by screw fixation was troublesome and the volume of the distal tibiofibular space increased with the suture-button fixation technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle; screw; suture-button; syndesmosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27535086     DOI: 10.1177/1071100716661221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  18 in total

1.  Dynamic fixation is superior in terms of clinical outcomes to static fixation in managing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

Authors:  Kaifeng Gan; Dingli Xu; Keqi Hu; Wei Wu; Yandong Shen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Maxwell W Weinberg; Nathan P Davidson; Megan K Mills; Beat Hintermann; Charles L Saltzman; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Clinical outcomes of isolated acute instability of the syndesmosis treated with arthroscopy and percutaneous suture-button fixation.

Authors:  Danilo Ryuko Cândido Nishikawa; Guilherme Honda Saito; Adilson Sanches de Oliveira Junior; Alberto Abussamra Moreira Mendes; Leticia Piovesana Devito; Marcelo Pires Prado
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Intraoperative Assessment of Reduction of the Ankle Syndesmosis.

Authors:  Kevin A Hao; Robert A Vander Griend; Jennifer A Nichols; Christopher W Reb
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-07-13

5.  Biomechanics comparison between endobutton fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for syndesmotic injury ankle fracture; a finite element analysis and cadaveric validation study.

Authors:  Papangkorn Meekaew; Permsak Paholpak; Taweechok Wisanuyotin; Winai Sirichativapee; Wilasinee Sirichativapee; Weerachai Kosuwon; Yuichi Kasai
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-05

Review 6.  A meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of syndesmotic injury treated with metal screw, dynamic fixation, and bioabsorbable screw.

Authors:  Jiayong Liu; Gautam Pathak; Mihir Joshi; Kyle Andrews; Joseph Lee
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-24

Review 7.  Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: From diagnosis to treatment and current concepts.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Massimo De Filippo; Daniele Casalini; Alberto Longhi; Fabrizio Tacci; Rocco Perotta; Francesco Pagnini; Silvio Tocco; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 8.  Functional outcome of fusion versus ligament reconstruction in patients with a syndesmosis injury: A narrative review.

Authors:  Sai-Kit Lim; Yui-Chung Ho; Samuel Ka-Kin Ling; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2021-06-12

9.  Anatomic Repair vs Closed Reduction of the Syndesmosis.

Authors:  Christopher Del Balso; Al-Walid Hamam; Moaz Bin Yunus Chohan; Christina Tieszer; Abdel-Rahman Lawendy; David William Sanders
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 10.  A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

Authors:  Pei Zhang; Yuan Liang; Jinshan He; Yongchao Fang; Pengtao Chen; Jingcheng Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.