Literature DB >> 29798526

[Effectiveness comparison of flexible fixation and rigid fixation in treatment of ankle pronation-external rotation fractures with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis].

Yuewei Li1, Minghui Zhang1, Xiaorong Li1, Xiaoyong Chen2, Jianlong Deng1.   

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of flexible fixation and rigid fixation in the treatment of ankle pronation-external rotation fractures with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 50 patients with ankle pronation-external rotation fractures and distal tibiofibular syndesmosis treated between January 2013 and December 2015. Suture-button fixation was used in 23 patients (flexible fixation group) and cortical screw fixation in 27 patients (rigid fixation group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, weight, side, fracture type, and time from trauma to surgery between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, medial clear space (MCS), tibiofibular clear space (TFCS), tibiofibular overlap (TFO), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) score were compared between 2 groups.
Results: The operation time was (83.0±9.1) minutes in the flexible fixation group and was (79.6±13.1) minutes in the rigid fixation group, showing no significant difference ( t=1.052, P=0.265). All patients achieved healing of incision by first intention. The patients were followed up 12-20 months (mean, 14 months). The X-ray films showed good healing of fracture in 2 groups. There was no screw fracture, delayed union or nounion. The fracture healing time was (12.1±2.5) months in the flexible fixation group and was (11.3±3.2) months in the rigid fixation group, showing no significant difference between 2 groups ( t=1.024, P=0.192). Reduction loss occurred after removal of screw in 2 cases of the rigid fixation group. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in MCS, TFCS, TFO, AOFAS score and FADI score between 2 groups ( P>0.05).
Conclusion: Suture-button fixation has similar effectiveness to screw fixation in ankle function and imaging findings, and flexible fixation has lower risk of reduction loss of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis than rigid fixation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis; ankle fracture; flexible fixation; rigid fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29798526     DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201702050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  2 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of syndesmotic injury treated with metal screw, dynamic fixation, and bioabsorbable screw.

Authors:  Jiayong Liu; Gautam Pathak; Mihir Joshi; Kyle Andrews; Joseph Lee
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-24

2.  [Comparison of bioabsorbable screw and metallic screw for Maisonneuve fracture].

Authors:  Xiaodong Wen; Jun Lu; Hongmou Zhao; Yi Li; Xin Chang; Yan Zhang; Jingqi Liang; Xiaojun Liang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-04-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.