Jacob Thoenen1, Kathryn J Stevens2, Tom D Turmezei3, Akshay Chaudhari2, Lauren E Watkins2, Emily J McWalter4, Brian A Hargreaves2, Garry E Gold2, James W MacKay5,6, Feliks Kogan2. 1. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. jthoenen@stanford.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK. 4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. 5. Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 6. Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether synovitis graded by radiologists using hybrid quantitative double-echo in steady-state (qDESS) images can be utilized as a non-contrast approach to assess synovitis in the knee, compared against the reference standard of contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI). METHODS: Twenty-two knees (11 subjects) with moderate to severe osteoarthritis (OA) were scanned using CE-MRI, qDESS with a high diffusion weighting (qDESSHigh), and qDESS with a low diffusion weighting (qDESSLow). Four radiologists graded the overall impression of synovitis, their diagnostic confidence, and regional grading of synovitis severity at four sites (suprapatellar pouch, intercondylar notch, and medial and lateral peripatellar recesses) in the knee using a 4-point scale. Agreement between CE-MRI and qDESS, inter-rater agreement, and intra-rater agreement were assessed using a linearly weighted Gwet's AC2. RESULTS: Good agreement was seen between CE-MRI and both qDESSLow (AC2 = 0.74) and qDESSHigh (AC2 = 0.66) for the overall impression of synovitis, but both qDESS sequences tended to underestimate the severity of synovitis compared to CE-MRI. Good inter-rater agreement was seen for both qDESS sequences (AC2 = 0.74 for qDESSLow, AC2 = 0.64 for qDESSHigh), and good intra-rater agreement was seen for both sequences as well (qDESSLow AC2 = 0.78, qDESSHigh AC2 = 0.80). Diagnostic confidence was moderate to high for qDESSLow (mean = 2.36) and slightly less than moderate for qDESSHigh (mean = 1.86), compared to mostly high confidence for CE-MRI (mean = 2.73). CONCLUSIONS: qDESS shows potential as an alternative MRI technique for assessing the severity of synovitis without the use of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. KEY POINTS: The use of the quantitative double-echo in steady-state (qDESS) sequence for synovitis assessment does not require the use of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Preliminary results found that low diffusion-weighted qDESS (qDESSLow) shows good agreement to contrast-enhanced MRI for characterization of the severity of synovitis, with a relative bias towards underestimation of severity. Preliminary results also found that qDESSLow shows good inter- and intra-rater agreement for the depiction of synovitis, particularly for readers experienced with the sequence.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether synovitis graded by radiologists using hybrid quantitative double-echo in steady-state (qDESS) images can be utilized as a non-contrast approach to assess synovitis in the knee, compared against the reference standard of contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI). METHODS: Twenty-two knees (11 subjects) with moderate to severe osteoarthritis (OA) were scanned using CE-MRI, qDESS with a high diffusion weighting (qDESSHigh), and qDESS with a low diffusion weighting (qDESSLow). Four radiologists graded the overall impression of synovitis, their diagnostic confidence, and regional grading of synovitis severity at four sites (suprapatellar pouch, intercondylar notch, and medial and lateral peripatellar recesses) in the knee using a 4-point scale. Agreement between CE-MRI and qDESS, inter-rater agreement, and intra-rater agreement were assessed using a linearly weighted Gwet's AC2. RESULTS: Good agreement was seen between CE-MRI and both qDESSLow (AC2 = 0.74) and qDESSHigh (AC2 = 0.66) for the overall impression of synovitis, but both qDESS sequences tended to underestimate the severity of synovitis compared to CE-MRI. Good inter-rater agreement was seen for both qDESS sequences (AC2 = 0.74 for qDESSLow, AC2 = 0.64 for qDESSHigh), and good intra-rater agreement was seen for both sequences as well (qDESSLow AC2 = 0.78, qDESSHigh AC2 = 0.80). Diagnostic confidence was moderate to high for qDESSLow (mean = 2.36) and slightly less than moderate for qDESSHigh (mean = 1.86), compared to mostly high confidence for CE-MRI (mean = 2.73). CONCLUSIONS: qDESS shows potential as an alternative MRI technique for assessing the severity of synovitis without the use of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. KEY POINTS: The use of the quantitative double-echo in steady-state (qDESS) sequence for synovitis assessment does not require the use of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Preliminary results found that low diffusion-weighted qDESS (qDESSLow) shows good agreement to contrast-enhanced MRI for characterization of the severity of synovitis, with a relative bias towards underestimation of severity. Preliminary results also found that qDESSLow shows good inter- and intra-rater agreement for the depiction of synovitis, particularly for readers experienced with the sequence.
Authors: Alexander Radbruch; Lukas D Weberling; Pascal J Kieslich; Oliver Eidel; Sina Burth; Philipp Kickingereder; Sabine Heiland; Wolfgang Wick; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Martin Bendszus Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Robert J McDonald; Jennifer S McDonald; David F Kallmes; Mark E Jentoft; David L Murray; Kent R Thielen; Eric E Williamson; Laurence J Eckel Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Peter Marckmann; Lone Skov; Kristian Rossen; Anders Dupont; Mette Brimnes Damholt; James Goya Heaf; Henrik S Thomsen Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2006-08-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Yuqing Zhang; Michael Nevitt; Jingbo Niu; Cora Lewis; James Torner; Ali Guermazi; Frank Roemer; Charles McCulloch; David T Felson Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2011-03
Authors: Frank W Roemer; C Kent Kwoh; Michael J Hannon; David J Hunter; Felix Eckstein; Zhijie Wang; Robert M Boudreau; Markus R John; Michael C Nevitt; Ali Guermazi Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Elizabeth A Sadowski; Lindsey K Bennett; Micah R Chan; Andrew L Wentland; Andrea L Garrett; Robert W Garrett; Arjang Djamali Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Donna R Roberts; Scott M Lindhorst; Cynthia T Welsh; Kenneth R Maravilla; Mary N Herring; K Adam Braun; Bruce H Thiers; W Clay Davis Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Reva C Lawrence; David T Felson; Charles G Helmick; Lesley M Arnold; Hyon Choi; Richard A Deyo; Sherine Gabriel; Rosemarie Hirsch; Marc C Hochberg; Gene G Hunder; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffrey N Katz; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Frederick Wolfe Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-01
Authors: Frank W Roemer; Yuqing Zhang; Jingbo Niu; John A Lynch; Michel D Crema; Monica D Marra; Michael C Nevitt; David T Felson; Laura B Hughes; George Y El-Khoury; Martin Englund; Ali Guermazi Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lisa Mertens; Kristine De Martelaer; Arja Sääkslahti; Eva D'Hondt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jacob Thoenen; James W MacKay; Halston J C Sandford; Garry E Gold; Feliks Kogan Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 3.959