Literature DB >> 26953564

High Levels of Gadolinium Deposition in the Skin of a Patient With Normal Renal Function.

Donna R Roberts1, Scott M Lindhorst, Cynthia T Welsh, Kenneth R Maravilla, Mary N Herring, K Adam Braun, Bruce H Thiers, W Clay Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess gadolinium deposition in the skin of a patient with normal renal function, based on estimated glomerular filtration rate values greater than 59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) after exposure to large cumulative doses of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient underwent 61 contrasted brain MRI scans over the course of 11 years. Skin biopsies from the forearm and lower extremity were analyzed with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), laser ablation ICP-MS, and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography ICP-MS.
RESULTS: The ICP-MS demonstrated high levels of gadolinium deposition (14.5 ± 0.4 μg/g), similar to previously reported gadolinium levels within the skin of patients with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. The laser ablation ICP-MS demonstrated deposition of gadolinium within the deep layers of skin. Speciation analysis using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography ICP-MS demonstrated the presence of intact gadolinium-chelate species, although most of the gadolinium present could not be further characterized. Light microscopy demonstrated increased CD34 immunoreactivity in the connective tissue septations of the subcutaneous adipose tissue. The patient had no history of skin disorders and did not have a history of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis but did have severe joint contractures of unknown etiology.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results, in contradiction to published literature, suggest that in patients with normal renal function, exposure to GBCAs in extremely high cumulative doses can lead to significant gadolinium deposition in the skin. This finding is in line with more recent reports of gadolinium deposition in the brain of patients with normal renal function. Future studies are required to address possible clinical consequences of gadolinium deposition in the skin, brain, and potentially other organs in patients with normal renal function. We recommend, in addition to following current US Food and Drug Administration and American College of Radiology guidelines based on estimated glomerular filtration rate values, that caution be used when administering large cumulative doses of GBCAs and that total cumulative dose of each agent administered is recorded in the patient's medical record.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26953564     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  33 in total

Review 1.  The biological fate of gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents: a call to action for bioinorganic chemists.

Authors:  Mariane Le Fur; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.526

2.  Organ retention of gadolinium in mother and pup mice: effect of pregnancy and type of gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Khongorzul Erdene; Takahito Nakajima; Satomi Kameo; Miski Aghnia Khairinisa; Oyunbold Lamid-Ochir; Amartuvshin Tumenjargal; Noriyuki Koibuchi; Hiroshi Koyama; Yoshito Tsushima
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  Gadolinium retention in the body: what we know and what we can do.

Authors:  Enrico Tedeschi; Ferdinando Caranci; Flavio Giordano; Valentina Angelini; Sirio Cocozza; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  The Impact of Excess Ligand on the Retention of Nonionic, Linear Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Patients With Various Levels of Renal Dysfunction: A Review and Simulation Analysis.

Authors:  John P Prybylski; Michael Jay
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.620

5.  Gadolinium Deposition Safety: Seeking the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  C A Mallio; C C Quattrocchi; À Rovira; P M Parizel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Evaluating the Patient with Reported Gadolinium-Associated Illness.

Authors:  Tatyana Lyapustina; Charlotte Goldfine; Sean Rhyee; Kavita M Babu; Matthew K Griswold
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-29

7.  Retention of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Multiple Sclerosis: Retrospective Analysis of an 18-Year Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Y Forslin; S Shams; F Hashim; P Aspelin; G Bergendal; J Martola; S Fredrikson; M Kristoffersen-Wiberg; T Granberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Surveillance magnetic resonance imaging for isolated optic pathway gliomas: is gadolinium necessary?

Authors:  Ezekiel Maloney; A Luana Stanescu; Francisco A Perez; Ramesh S Iyer; Randolph K Otto; Sarah Leary; Lotte Steuten; Amanda I Phipps; Dennis W W Shaw
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-05-22

9.  Self-gated 4D multiphase, steady-state imaging with contrast enhancement (MUSIC) using rotating cartesian K-space (ROCK): Validation in children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Fei Han; Ziwu Zhou; Eric Han; Yu Gao; Kim-Lien Nguyen; J Paul Finn; Peng Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  A Manganese-based Alternative to Gadolinium: Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography, Excretion, Pharmacokinetics, and Metabolism.

Authors:  Eric M Gale; Hsiao-Ying Wey; Ian Ramsay; Yi-Fen Yen; David E Sosnovik; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.