Literature DB >> 25279436

Can structural joint damage measured with MR imaging be used to predict knee replacement in the following year?

Frank W Roemer1, C Kent Kwoh, Michael J Hannon, David J Hunter, Felix Eckstein, Zhijie Wang, Robert M Boudreau, Markus R John, Michael C Nevitt, Ali Guermazi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based cross-sectional measures of structural joint damage can be used to predict knee replacement during the following year.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were drawn from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a longitudinal observational study that includes 4796 participants who have knee osteoarthritis or are at risk. The HIPAA-compliant protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of all participating centers, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. During the 5 years of follow-up, 199 knees underwent knee replacement and were matched with 199 control knees that did not undergo knee replacement. Knees were matched according to radiographic disease stage and patient sex and age. All knees that underwent knee replacement and had MR images available from the year before surgery were included. MR images were assessed for cartilage damage, bone marrow lesions, meniscal damage, meniscal extrusion, synovitis, and effusion prior to reported knee replacement. Conditional logistic regression was applied to assess the risk of knee replacement. Analyses were performed on a compartmental and knee level.
RESULTS: Participants had a mean age ± standard deviation of 64.2 years ± 8.4 (range, 47-82 years) and were predominantly women (232 of 398 participants, 58.3%). Risk for knee replacement was significantly increased for knees that exhibited two or more subregions with severe cartilage loss (odds ratio [OR], 16.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.96, 68.76), more than two subregions with bone marrow lesions (OR, 4.00; 95% CI: 1.75, 9.16), medial meniscal maceration (OR, 1.84; 95% CI: 1.13, 2.99), effusion (OR, 4.75; 95% CI: 2.55, 8.85), or synovitis (OR, 2.17; 95% CI: 1.33, 3.56), but not extrusion (OR, 1.00; 95% CI: 0.60,1.67), when compared with knees that did not exhibit these features as the reference standard.
CONCLUSION: Apart from meniscal extrusion, all features of tissue abnormalities at MR imaging were related to clinical prognosis and could be used to predict knee replacement in the following year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25279436      PMCID: PMC4455669          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

1.  Appropriateness criteria and elective procedures--total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hassan M K Ghomrawi; Bruce R Schackman; Alvin I Mushlin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Quantitative MRI measures of cartilage predict knee replacement: a case-control study from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; C Kent Kwoh; Robert M Boudreau; Zhijie Wang; Michael J Hannon; Sebastian Cotofana; Martin I Hudelmaier; Wolfgang Wirth; Ali Guermazi; Michael C Nevitt; Markus R John; David J Hunter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Risk factors for magnetic resonance imaging-detected patellofemoral and tibiofemoral cartilage loss during a six-month period: the joints on glucosamine study.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; C Kent Kwoh; Michael J Hannon; Stephanie M Green; John M Jakicic; Robert Boudreau; Michel D Crema; Carolyn E Moore; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-12-27

Review 4.  Knee replacement.

Authors:  Andrew J Carr; Otto Robertsson; Stephen Graves; Andrew J Price; Nigel K Arden; Andrew Judge; David J Beard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score).

Authors:  D J Hunter; A Guermazi; G H Lo; A J Grainger; P G Conaghan; R M Boudreau; F W Roemer
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic.

Authors:  Elena Losina; Thomas S Thornhill; Benjamin N Rome; John Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  What is the predictive value of MRI for the occurrence of knee replacement surgery in knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  J-P Pelletier; C Cooper; C Peterfy; J-Y Reginster; M-L Brandi; O Bruyère; R Chapurlat; F Cicuttini; P G Conaghan; M Doherty; H Genant; G Giacovelli; M C Hochberg; D J Hunter; J A Kanis; M Kloppenburg; J-D Laredo; T McAlindon; M Nevitt; J-P Raynauld; R Rizzoli; C Zilkens; F W Roemer; J Martel-Pelletier; A Guermazi
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander M Weinstein; Benjamin N Rome; William M Reichmann; Jamie E Collins; Sara A Burbine; Thomas S Thornhill; John Wright; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Osteoarthritis as an inflammatory disease (osteoarthritis is not osteoarthrosis!).

Authors:  F Berenbaum
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Association between several clinical and radiological determinants with long-term clinical progression and good prognosis of lower limb osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Erlangga Yusuf; Jessica Bijsterbosch; P Eline Slagboom; Herman M Kroon; Frits R Rosendaal; Tom W J Huizinga; Margreet Kloppenburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  28 in total

1.  Quantitative measures of meniscus extrusion predict incident radiographic knee osteoarthritis--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  K Emmanuel; E Quinn; J Niu; A Guermazi; F Roemer; W Wirth; F Eckstein; D Felson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  From Early Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis to Joint Arthroplasty: Determinants of Structural Progression and Symptoms.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; C Kent Kwoh; Tomoko Fujii; Michael J Hannon; Robert M Boudreau; David J Hunter; Felix Eckstein; Markus R John; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Reliability of meniscus tear description: a study using MRI from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Kevin B Hoover; Josephina A Vossen; Curtis W Hayes; Dan L Riddle
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Comparison of radiographic joint space width and magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of knee replacement: A longitudinal case-control study from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Robert Boudreau; Zhijie Wang; Michael J Hannon; Jeff Duryea; Wolfgang Wirth; Sebastian Cotofana; Ali Guermazi; Frank Roemer; Michael Nevitt; Markus R John; Christoph Ladel; Leena Sharma; David J Hunter; C Kent Kwoh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The relationship between meniscal pathology and osteoarthritis depends on the type of meniscal damage visible on magnetic resonance images: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  B Antony; J B Driban; L L Price; G H Lo; R J Ward; M Nevitt; J Lynch; C B Eaton; C Ding; T E McAlindon
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Medial compartment defects progress at a more rapid rate than lateral cartilage defects in older adults with minimal to moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA): data from the OA initiative.

Authors:  Joshua S Everhart; Moneer M Abouljoud; Sarah G Poland; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Brief Report: Partial- and Full-Thickness Focal Cartilage Defects Contribute Equally to Development of New Cartilage Damage in Knee Osteoarthritis: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  Ali Guermazi; Daichi Hayashi; Frank W Roemer; Jingbo Niu; Emily K Quinn; Michel D Crema; Michael C Nevitt; James Torner; Cora E Lewis; David T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 10.995

8.  Semiquantitative Imaging Biomarkers of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression: Data From the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium.

Authors:  Jamie E Collins; Elena Losina; Michael C Nevitt; Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi; John A Lynch; Jeffrey N Katz; C Kent Kwoh; Virginia B Kraus; David J Hunter
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.995

9.  The bulge sign - a simple physical examination for identifying progressive knee osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Andrew J Teichtahl; Anita E Wluka; Sultana Monira Hussain; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Prediction of medial tibiofemoral compartment joint space loss progression using volumetric cartilage measurements: Data from the FNIH OA biomarkers consortium.

Authors:  Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; David J Hunter; Erik B Dam; Bashir Zikria; C Kent Kwoh; Shadpour Demehri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.