Literature DB >> 33992037

Targeted Deletion of Los1 Homologue Affects the Production of a Recombinant Model Protein in Pichia pastoris.

Najmeh Zarei1, Hosnieh Ghasemi1, Mahsa Nayebhashemi1, Mozhgan Zahmatkesh1, Monire Jamalkhah2, Nafiseh Moeinian1, Zahra Mohammadi1, Somayeh Enayati1, Vahid Khalaj1.   

Abstract

Background: The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris is an appealing production host for a variety of recombinant proteins, including biologics. In this sense, various genetic- and non-genetic-based techniques have been implemented to improve the production efficiency of this expression platform. Loss of supression (Los1) encodes a non-essential nuclear tRNA exporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which its deletion extends replicative lifespan. Herein, a los1-deficient strain of P. pastoris was generated and characterized.
Methods: A gene disruption cassette was prepared and transformed into an anti-CD22-expressing strain of P. pastoris. A δ los1 mutant was isolated and confirmed. The drug sensitivity of the mutant was also assessed. The growth pattern and the level of anti-CD22 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) expression were compared between the parent and mutant strains. Resuults: The los1 homologue was found to be a non-essential gene in P. pastoris. Furthermore, the susceptibility of los1 deletion strain to protein synthesis inhibitors was altered. This strain showed an approximately 1.85-fold increase in the extracellular level of anti-CD22 scFv (p < 0.05). The maximum concentrations of total proteins secreted by δ los1 and parent strains were 125 mg/L and 68 mg/L, respectively.
Conclusion: The presented data suggest that the targeted disruption of los1 homologue in P. pastoris can result in a higher expression level of our target protein. Findings of this study may improve the current strategies used in optimizing the productivity of recombinant P. pastoris strains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Longevity; Pichia pastoris; Recombinant proteins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33992037      PMCID: PMC8334395          DOI: 10.52547/ibj.25.4.255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran Biomed J        ISSN: 1028-852X


INTRODUCTION

The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris is frequently used for the high level production of recombinant proteins, especially where the Escherichia coli system fails to deliver correctly folded functional proteins, or the Saccharomyces cerevisiae system produces hyper-mannosylated inactive proteins[[1]]. The recent development of glycoengineered Pichia strains generating human-like glycan pattern, along with the adaptation of new genome editing tools, such as CRISPR system, has offered further advantages for the industrial application of Pichia platform[[2],[3]]. Available reports indicate the highest amount of intracellular (22 g/L) and extracellular (18 g/L) protein expression levels in P. pastoris[[4]]. As a matter of fact, not all proteins are produced at such a high level, and the amount of protein expression depends largely on the intrinsic properties of the target protein. Fortunately, in many cases, the initial expression levels can greatly be improved by the manipulation of host genome or culture conditions. The genetic manipulation of host cells using targeted gene deletion or overexpression has been one of the most important optimization approaches that can affect the quantity and quality of a desired protein product[[5]]. The production of recombinant proteins in P. pastoris is a growth-dependent process[[6]] such that host cell engineering for cell lifespan extension is considered as a promising strategy in increasing the yield of recombinant protein production. Cell aging can affect both protein synthesis and degradation, by altering the components of the translation machinery, as well as the intracellular distribution of newly synthesized proteins[[7],[8]]. In this sense, the manipulation of aging process may alter the final yield of recombinant products during the mass production procedures. The budding yeast, S. cerevisiae, has been an excellent model for aging and lifespan-related studies. Both RLS (the number of daughter cells generated by a mother cell before replicative senescence) and CLS (the survival time of a yeast cell in non-dividing condition) have already been defined, and molecular mechanisms involved in the yeast lifespan have been investigated in details[[9],[10]]. So far, several genes identified in yeast have been shown to be able to modulate the aging process through different mechanisms[[11],[12]]. Los1 (loss of supression), as a non-essential gene in S. cerevisiae, encodes a nuclear tRNA exporter, and its deletion robustly increases lifespan in this organism[[12]]. As a member of the conserved β-importin family, Los1 dictates the direction of tRNA transport across nuclear pores using the nuclear-cytoplasmic gradient of RanGTP[[13]]. Considering the conserved mechanisms influencing the lifespan and aging among eukaryotes[[12],[14],[15]], herein, we report the inactivation of Los1 gene homologue, in P. pastoris using a site-directed disruption construct. The impact of this deletion on the viability and growth of the deletant was monitored, and the production yield of a model recombinant protein, anti-CD22 scFv, was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains, plasmids, and culture conditions E. coli Top 10F′ was employed as a host for DNA manipulations, and P. pastoris strain GS115 (his4) with mut+ phenotype (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for protein expression studies. pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega, Madison, USA) was applied for cloning of PCR products, and the pSH67 plasmid, carrying G418 resistance gene (KanMX), as a yeast selection marker, was utilized as an intermediate vector for assembling the los1 disruption cassette (Fig. 1). E. coli Top 10F′ was cultured in Luria-Bertani medium (in w/v; 1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 1% NaCl, pH 7.0) at 37 °C. Ampicillin was added to the LB medium for plasmid selection at the final concentration of 100 μg/ml. The yeast P. pastoris strain was grown in YPD medium (in w/v; 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% dextrose), whereas YPD plates containing G418 (300 μg/mL or as indicated) were used for the selection of G418-positive P. pastoris transformants. The BMGY was prepared with 2% peptone, 1% yeast extract, 1% glycerol, 1.34% yeast nitrogen base, with ammonium sulfate but without amino acids, and 4 × 10-5% biotin in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer. The preparation of BMMY was carried out the same as BMGY, except for the replacement of glycerol with 0.5 % methanol.
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the various constructs used in the study. (A) pSH67, (B) pSH67-Los1-KO, and (C) replacement of Los1 gene by KanMX through the homologous recombination. The positions of primers used in the preparation of the disruption cassette or confirmatory PCRs are shown by arrows

Identification of homologue in For the identification of the Los1 homologue in P. pastoris, the amino acid sequence of S. cerevisiae Los1 was retrieved from the UniProt database, and a protein blast against fungal database was performed (https://www.uniprot.org/). Similar searches were also carried out at http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov and http://pichiagenome-ext.boku.ac.at/. Phylogenomic databases such as eggNOG (http://eggnogdb.embl.de), HOGENOM (http://hogenom.univ-lyon1.fr/), OrthoDB (https://www.orthodb.org/) and Inparanoid (http:// inparanoid.sbc.su.se/cgi-bin/index.cgi) were also used to investigate the presence of the Los1 homologue in P. pastoris. Nuclear localization signal sequence was predicted using an online software (http://mleg.cse.sc. edu/seqNLS/). Preparation of gene disruption cassette The target gene disruption construct was prepared using standard PCR and cloning protocols, and the final cassette was validated by restriction mapping and DNA sequencing[[16]]. Briefly, to facilitate homologous recombination, a 1000-bp upstream and a 1000-bp downstream flanking regions of Los1 homologue in P. pastoris were amplified using specific primer sets KO-UP_F/R and KO_DW_F/R, harboring SacI/PvuII and XbaI/BglII restriction sites, respectively (Table 1). The amplified fragments were sequentially subcloned into pSH67, the upstream and downstream of KanMX selection marker, to create the pSH67-los1-KO construct (Fig. 1A and 1B).
Table 1

Primers used in this study

Primer Sequence
KO_UP_F CAGCTG_ATAGCACCTTCCTCGTTC
KO_UP_R GAGCTC_TAGCAGTGGGTGGTGAACT
KO_DW_F AGATCT_GTGACTTATGAGAATAAGT
KO_DW_R TCTAGA_AGATGCGCTTTCAAGCAA
Kan_FGACATGGAGGCCCAGAATAC
Kan_RCAGTATAGCGACCAGCA
1030_UP_LosCTTCCAGCCTTAACCTTGC
Kan-diagTCGATTCGATACTAACGCC

Restriction site sequences are underlined.

Transformation of and selection of disruptant clones The pSH67-Los1-KO construct was double-digested with XhoI/PvuII enzymes, and the linearized Los1-KO fragment, containing KanMX and flanking los1 up and down sequences, was purified from agarose gel and used to transform the competent P. pastoris GS115 strain, expressing scFv, according to the Invitrogen protocol. Briefly, the competent P. pastoris GS115 cells were prepared by successive cultivation in YPD broth medium, followed by sequential washing steps using ice-cold water and sorbitol. The los1-KO fragment (5 µg in 10 μL of dH2O) was mixed with 80 μL of competent cells and subjected to electroporation, using a Gene Pulser Xcell™ device (Biorad, USA; settings: 1,500 charging voltage, 25-μF capacitance, and 200-Ω resistance). G418-resistant colonies were selected on YPD agar medium containing 300 μg/mL of G418 at 30 °C. Next, the large transformant colonies were purified by re-streaking on YPD plates, containing 300 μg/mL of G418. The selected transformants were analyzed for the occurrence of homologous recombination through diagnostic PCRs using different specific primer sets. To design these primers, we selected a sequence from the Pichia genome, suited at the 30-bp upstream of the UP fragment, used in the KO construct (1030_UP_Los, Table 1). This sequence was absent from the los1-KO construct and was thus used as the forward primer. A primer targeting the 5’ end of the KanMX gene (Kan_F, Table 1) was used as the reverse primer, for the first round of screening. For further confirmation, the second diagnostic PCR was performed using a primer designed for the 100-bp region, at the 3’ end of the KanMX gene (Kanـdiag, Table 1) and primer 1030_UP_Los. The correct deletion transformants were designated as δ los1GS115/scFv. Primers used in this study Restriction site sequences are underlined. Preparation of growth curves For investigating the effect of los1 inactivation on the growth of different strains used in this study, a single colony of GS115, GS115/scFv, and δ los1GS115/scFv was picked and grown in 5 ml of YPD. The cultivation was started with an OD600 of 1.0, and sampling and OD determination were performed at the following time: 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 h. The same protocol was carried out in BMMY expression culture medium. Schematic diagram of the various constructs used in the study. (A) pSH67, (B) pSH67-Los1-KO, and (C) replacement of Los1 gene by KanMX through the homologous recombination. The positions of primers used in the preparation of the disruption cassette or confirmatory PCRs are shown by arrows Evaluation of cell viability using trypan blue test For more accurate determination of growth patterns, in addition to OD measurements, the number of live cells was counted using trypan blue staining method, followed by light microscopy observation at specific time points of 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours. Determination of chemical sensitivity The in vitro susceptibility of δ los1GS115/scFv to some antifungal agents (hygromycin, itraconazole, nystatin), as well as protein synthesis affecting compounds, rapamycin and cycloheximide, was assessed by measuring MICs based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Guidelines, with some modifications[[17]]. Briefly, a total of 103 yeast cells were inoculated onto each well of a 96-well microtiter plate containing RPMI-1640 medium, enriched with 2% glucose and buffered to pH 7.0 with 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid. The plates were incubated at 30 oC, and MICs were assessed at a final compound concentration range of 0-200 µg/mL after 24 and 48 hours. Expression of anti-CD22 scFv in GS115/scFv strain Single colonies of los1 deletion strain were grown individually in 25 mL of BMGY medium at 30 °C, 250 rpm for 16–18 h to reach an OD600 of 2 to 6 (log phase growth). Thereafter, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3,000 ×g at room temperature for 5 min. To induce protein expression, the pellets were resuspended in 100–200 mL of BMMY medium to an OD600 of 1.0 and grown at 30 °C, while shaking at 250 rpm. Fresh methanol (100%) was added, every 24 h, to a concentration of 0.5% to compensate for losses from evaporation and metabolism. The medium (25 mL) from each culture was harvested every 24 h and centrifuged 5800 ×g at 4 °C for 10 min. To detect the recombinant protein, the culture supernatants were concentrated using an Amicon® Stirred Cell (Merck, USA) and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis Culture supernatant samples were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 12% polyacrylamide gel according to the current protocols. The gels were stained with Coomassie Blue R-250, and the protein lanes were scanned, and the expression levels of the target scFv were evaluated through the intensity measurements of protein bands using a gel image analysis software (Quantity OneTM, ver. 4.6.3; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Western blot analysis was performed in accordance with standard protocols[[16]] using a mouse horse-radish peroxidase-labeled monoclonal antibody against the 6× His-tag (Invitrogen). Finally, positive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham Life Sciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). In each experiment, the total amount of extracellular proteins was assessed by standard Bradford method. Comparison of anti-CD22 scFv expression at different times in GS115/scFv and GS115/scFv strains In order to compare the expression levels of anti-CD22 scFv in mutant and parental strains, we induced expression in GS115/scFv and δ los1GS115/scFv single clones, as per the Invitrogen protocol under controlled conditions. The cells were grown in BMGY medium overnight and then transferred to BMMY medium (150 ml) with the same OD = 1.0 and incubated under exactly the same conditions. At specific time points (12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 h) after incubation, culture sampling was performed. The supernatant was separated by centrifugation at 5800 ×g at 4 °C for 10 min. Equal volumes of supernatants from both clones were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and the resolved proteins were visualized by Coomassie Blue Staining. The relative amounts of the target recombinant scFv were determined through the densitometry analysis of SDS-PAGE gels. Statistical analysis The results were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 2). Data were analyzed by double-tail Student’s t-test. The differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Sequence analysis of homologue Los1 sequence from S. cerevisiae (Uniprot: P33418) was compared with the P. pastoris genome using BLASTp (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), and the top scoring match (Protein ID:XP_002491537.1) was selected for further analysis. This open reading frame, annotated as Exportin-T in UniProt (C4R183_KOMPG) and KEGG (K14288) databases, contains 1071 amino acids, with a theoretical pI of 5.5 and a molecular weight of ~123 kDa. Nuclear localization signal prediction identified the residues 21-64 as the potential nuclear targeting signal. The Los1-encoding sequence in Pichia genome is located on chromosome 2 (NC_012964.1 nucleotides 1,157,057..1,160,334) and contains 3216 nucleotides. Confirmatory PCRs on the genomic DNA of los1 disruption mutant of P. pastoris. Lane 1, PCR product amplified by 1030_UP/ Kan_F primer set (2500 bp); lane 2, PCR product with 1030_UP/Kan-diag primers (1100 bp); lane 3, PCR product with actin primers (as a control; 500 bp); lane 4, PCR with 1030_UP/KO_DW_R primers amplified the disruption construct as a 3.6-kb fragment due to the insertion of KanMX; lane 5, DNA marker homologue as a non-essential gene in The los1-KO fragment was successfully assembled in pSH67 and confirmed by restriction mapping and sequencing (data not shown). Transformation of P. pastoris strain by los1-KO construct resulted in several G418-resistant colonies. Colony PCR screening was carried out on 26 transformants using designed specific primers (Table 1). A successful gene disruption event was verified by PCR amplification of a 2500-bp fragment, with 1030_UP_Los/Kan_F primers (Fig. 2, lane 1). This event was further confirmed by the second PCR using Kan-diag/1030_UP_Los primers, which resulted in a 1100-bp PCR product (Fig. 2, lane 2) Also, in the case of correct replacement (gene disruption, Fig. 1C), a 3600-bp fragment was expected to be amplified by the 1030_UP_Los/KO_DW_R primers in the disrupted genome, as opposed to a 4600-bp fragment, in the parent strain (Fig. 2, lane 4). Five los1 gen-disrupted strains were isolated via the above screening steps, and all were able to grow normally on YPD agar, indicating that the los1 gene is non-essential for the viability of P. pastoris.
Fig. 2

Confirmatory PCRs on the genomic DNA of los1 disruption mutant of P. pastoris. Lane 1, PCR product amplified by 1030_UP/ Kan_F primer set (2500 bp); lane 2, PCR product with 1030_UP/Kan-diag primers (1100 bp); lane 3, PCR product with actin primers (as a control; 500 bp); lane 4, PCR with 1030_UP/KO_DW_R primers amplified the disruption construct as a 3.6-kb fragment due to the insertion of KanMX; lane 5, DNA marker

Effect of inactivation on the growth curve of GS115/scFv The growth pattern of GS115/scFv and δ los1GS115/scFv strains were examined and compared to the wild type GS115, in both YPD and BMMY media. The results demonstrated that both examined strains followed a similar sigmoidal pattern of growth in the two media. However, as shown in Figures 3, the initial growth rate of the δ los1GS115/scFv was slower than that of the parental GS115/scFv and wild type GS115 strains. In this regard, the final OD achieved by the δ los1GS115/scFv strain was higher than the other two strains. In YPD medium, maximum OD600 of about 25 was reached at 72 h, while the maximum OD600 for δ los1GS115/scFv was about 33 at 120 h. The same trend was observed during the growth in BMMY medium. The maximum ODs for GS115/scFv, GS115, and δ los1GS115/scFv clones in BMMY were 22, 23, and 29, respectively.
Fig. 3

Growth curve of δ los1GS115/scFv compared to GS115/scFv and GS115 in (A) YPD and (B) BMMY media. X-axis represents sampling intervals of 24 hours

Effect of disruption on the viability of GS115/scFv strain The bar chart in Figure 4 shows the effect of los1 disruption on the viability of the cells. These results indicate an increase in the number of viable δ los1GS115/scFv up to 120 hours and GS115/scFv up to 72 hours of growth, followed by an approximately 15% decrease per every 24 h. The number of live δ los1GS115/scFv cells was less than that of GS115/scFv in the first 72 hours. Subsequently, at 96 h, a sharp rise was observed in the number of viable δ los1GS115/scFv cells compared to the parental GS115/scFv, which was followed by a general increase in the number of live δ los1GS115/scFv cells, thereafter.
Fig. 4

Evaluation of viability of δ los1GS115/scFv in comparison to GS115/scFv cells

Growth curve of δ los1GS115/scFv compared to GS115/scFv and GS115 in (A) YPD and (B) BMMY media. X-axis represents sampling intervals of 24 hours Evaluation of viability of δ los1GS115/scFv in comparison to GS115/scFv cells Altered chemical susceptibility of δ GS115/scFv Although we did not observe any significant differences in MICs measured for several antifungal agents, including hygromycin, itraconazole, and nystatin, the susceptibility to rapamycin and cycloheximide was markedly different between δ los1GS115/scFv and the parent strain such that the los1 mutant strain was more sensitive to rapamycin (MIC = 0.62 µg/ml) as compared to the parent strain (MIC = 2.5 µg/ml) and more resistant to cycloheximide (MIC of 50 µg/ml vs. 25 µg/ml). Expression of anti-CD22 by GS115/scFv A single colony of δ los1 P. pastoris was selected, and the expression of the anti-CD22 scFv was induced by methanol as described above. The 72-h culture supernatant was collected, concentrated and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. A single protein band around 30 kDa was clearly observed in the culture medium of GS115/scFv and δ los1GS115/scFv, while the same band was absent from the culture supernatant of GS115 cells, transfected with the control plasmid (pPICZαA; Fig. 5). To confirm the expression of scFv, cell-free supernatants were further analyzed by Western blot analysis using mouse anti-6× His-tag antibody. The results demonstrated that anti-6×-His antibody positively reacted with a protein band of similar molecular weight observed in SDS-PAGE. Again, no similar bands were detected in the negative control (Fig. 5). These findings showed that the anti-CD22 scFv was successfully expressed in the recombinant δ los1GS115/scFv strain, and los1 inactivation did not interfere with anti-CD22 scFv production in P. pastoris.
Fig. 5

Analysis of proteins presented in the culture supernatants. Lanes 1-4, SDS-PAGE analysis; lane 1, protein bands of δ los1GS115/scFv culture supernatant; lane 2, protein marker; lane 3, supernatant of GS115 culture; lane 4, supernatant of GS115/scFv; lane 5, 6, and 7 indicate Western blot analysis on the supernatant of GS115, GS115/scFv, and δ los1GS115/scFv, respectively. Lanes 6 and 7 show positive signals with the expected size of ~30 kDa

gene disruption on anti-CD22 scFv expression levels The increase in the extracellular production of anti-CD22 scFv over time was clearly found in both δ los1 and parent GS115/scFv strains, except for δ los1GS115/scFv clone, where the expression levels started to increase slowly during the first 72 hours and then continued with a steeper slope (Figs. 6 and 7). In the GS115/scFv clone, the highest level of extracellular anti-CD22 scFv appeared at 72 hours and then gradually declined. However, in δ los1GS115/scFv clone, the peak expression of the secreted scFv was achieved at 120 hours, which declined thereafter. As depicted in Figure 8, the δ los1GS115/scFv strain showed about 1.85-fold increase in the extracellular level of anti-CD22 scFv, compared to the parent GS115/scFv strain (p < 0.05). A similar pattern was also observed for total secreted proteins (Fig. 9). The maximum concentrations of total proteins secreted by δ los1GS115/scFv and GS115/scFv strain were 125 mg/L and 68 mg/L, respectively (Fig. 10).
Fig. 6

SDS-PAGE analysis of culture supernatant of δ los1GS115/scFv after 72 h (1), 96 h (2), 120 h (3), 144 h (4), and 168 h, and (5) protein bands of ~30 kDa indicating the expression of recombinant anti-CD22 scFv

Fig. 7

Evaluation of anti-CD22 scFv expression levels at different times (every 24 h) in δ los1GS115/scFv and GS115/scFv

Fig. 8

The maximum concentration of anti-CD22 scFv expressed by δ los1GS115/scFv compared to GS115/scFv

Fig. 9

Evaluation of total protein concentration expression at different times (every 24 h) in δ los1GS115/scFv and GS115/scFv

Fig. 10

The maximum total extracellular protein concentration produced by δ los1GS115/scFv compared to GS115/scFv

DISCUSSION

Over the last decades, P. pastoris has emerged as a highly popular expression system for the recombinant production of various heterologous proteins[[18]]. More than 700 recombinant proteins have so far been expressed in P. pastoris, and more than 70 protein products are in the final stages of research before entering the market[[19]]. Available reports indicate that P. pastoris is able to produce up to 20-30 g/L of recombinant proteins[[4]]. The ability of this organism to produce high amounts of protein, as w ell as the FDA approval for certain biopharmaceutical products derived from this yeast system, has made P. pastoris a valuable host for industrial-scale heterologous protein production[[2]]. Analysis of proteins presented in the culture supernatants. Lanes 1-4, SDS-PAGE analysis; lane 1, protein bands of δ los1GS115/scFv culture supernatant; lane 2, protein marker; lane 3, supernatant of GS115 culture; lane 4, supernatant of GS115/scFv; lane 5, 6, and 7 indicate Western blot analysis on the supernatant of GS115, GS115/scFv, and δ los1GS115/scFv, respectively. Lanes 6 and 7 show positive signals with the expected size of ~30 kDa SDS-PAGE analysis of culture supernatant of δ los1GS115/scFv after 72 h (1), 96 h (2), 120 h (3), 144 h (4), and 168 h, and (5) protein bands of ~30 kDa indicating the expression of recombinant anti-CD22 scFv Despite the impressive advantages, some degrees of process optimization are required to achieve the maximum yield of the target proteins, using the Pichia platform. The recombinant protein production in P. pastoris is a growth-dependent process[[6]]. In this regard, running the production process under the high cell density condition can result in increased volumetric productivity[[20]]. Meanwhile, viable cell volume, as a fundamental bioprocess parameter, has been the subject of different studies, as any alteration in this variable can affect the quality and quantity of the final product[[21]-[23]]. To this end, strategies leading to the extension of the lifespan or delay in the aging process may effectively increase the viable cell densities. Up to now, many environmental and genetic factors are known that affect the RLS in yeast. Some well-studied interventions, like dietary restrictions, as well as mutations mimicking low nutrient availability[[8],[24]], deletion of some UPR target genes[[8]], and reduced target of rapamycin (TOR) and protein kinase A signaling[[25]], have been effective in lifespan modulations. Further to the above points, many studies have demonstrated the relationship between lifespan (particularly RLS), aging, and protein production[[8],[26],[27]]. The effectiveness of proteostasis control systems, which regulate the production and quality of the proteins in the cell, is diminished with age, giving rise to the accumulation of damaged proteins, which in turn inhibit cell functionality and efficient protein production[[28]]. Anisimova et al.[[8]] have clearly discussed that every step in the protein lifecycle, most notably protein synthesis and degradation, is relevant to the aging process. Several studies have demonstrated that the overall level of protein production is reduced with age[[8],[28],[29]]. Other investigations highlighted the reduced ribosome abundance, as well as attenuated activity and levels of major initiation and elongation factors[[30],[31]]. Aging can also affect the ability of cells in controlling the intracellular distribution of newly synthesized proteins[[8]]. Considering the negative effects of aging on the yield and quality of protein products in the cell, in the present study, we investigated the effect of los1 gene inactivation on the anti-CD22 scFv production level, in P. pastoris. Evaluation of anti-CD22 scFv expression levels at different times (every 24 h) in δ los1GS115/scFv and GS115/scFv The maximum concentration of anti-CD22 scFv expressed by δ los1GS115/scFv compared to GS115/scFv Los1 is supposed to be the main exportin for pre-tRNA-containing intron in yeast. Although the efficient transfer of tRNAs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm is vital for protein synthesis, los1 is not essential in yeast S. cerevisiae, and its deletion increases the yeast life span by 60%[[12]]. Consistent with data available for S. cerevisiae and some other fungal species[[32],[33]], the Pichia los1 homologue was found to be a non-essential gene, indicating the existence of a functional redundancy in tRNA export in P. pastoris. It has been well documented that following the inactivation of los1, the nuclear retention of tRNA autonomously signals the activation of several pathways, leading to the extension of lifespan[[12]]. Evaluation of total protein concentration expression at different times (every 24 h) in δ los1GS115/scFv and GS115/scFv In the present study, we observed a slower growth rate for δ los1GS115/scFv in comparison to the GS115/scFv, which in turn resulted in decreased levels of protein expression. This slow behavior may be due to the tRNAs limitations, which can reduce protein translation and growth rates in the early stages of the production process[[34]]. However, after 72 h, we observed a sudden increase in the growth rate, deduced from the OD values of culture media. The anti-CD22 scFv protein expression levels, produced by the δ los1GS115/scFv strain at different times, also followed a similar pattern to the growth curve with a final yield of ~1.85-fold higher than that of the parent strain. Since the amount of productivity in yeast cells is a function of cell density and specific production rate, the absence of los1 activity can enhance the final production yield via increasing the viability and subsequently, cell density. The maximum total extracellular protein concentration produced by δ los1GS115/scFv compared to GS115/scFv Buchetics et al.[[35]] have reported that the over-expression of the B-type cyclin CLB2 in P. pastoris shifted the cell population to the G2/M phase, in which a higher proportion of cells are in the budding state. This manipulation led to higher secretion efficiencies of different recombinant proteins, even at lower growth rates, where the wild-type cells usually show low secretion rates. As the los1 deletion in yeast results in increasing RLS (the number of buds a mother can produce before replication ceases), it can be speculated that the absence of los1 activity may increase the budding state of δlos1GS115/scFv cells, which in turn causes the higher extracellular production of the target protein over time. Moreover, Puxbaum and colleagues[[36]] have recently shown that the bud is a specific site for the protein secretion, and those manipulations, which keep more cells in the bud state, promotes a higher secretion efficiency. To test whether the deletion of los1 has any effect on the chemical susceptibility of the yeast, MIC levels were determined for different compounds. Among them, the los1 disruption strain was more sensitive to rapamycin, in comparison to the parental strain. Rapamycin has now emerged as an attractive therapeutic strategy with immunosuppressant properties. In addition, rapamycin has been proposed as a calorie restriction mimetic to extend the lifespan of various organisms. These rapamycin actions are mediated through the inhibition of the mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase and its downstream signaling pathways[[37]]. Doi et al.[[38]] carried out a chemical genomics screen for rapamycin-sensitive mutants using the genome deletion library, which covers 95.3% of all non-essential fission yeast genes and confirmed 59 mutants to be rapamycin sensitive. Among these mutants, los1-mutants scored as moderately sensitive to rapamycin, an observation that is consistent with our results. Cycloheximide is a potent inhibitor of protein synthesis, which acts through binding the 60S ribosomal subunit and arresting protein translation[[39],[40]]. In this study, we found that δ los1GS115/scFv was more resistant to cycloheximide, as compared with the wild type strain. This resistance can be due to the reduced activity of protein translation machinery in los1 disruptant, making it less sensitive to the inhibitory effects of cycloheximide. In conclusion, we demonstrated that los1 homologue is not essential for the viability of the yeast P. pastoris. However, the targeted disruption of this gene caused a higher expression level of our protein model. Our findings may serve the recombinant protein industry, where P. pastoris is used as a production host.
  37 in total

Review 1.  Ageing and the regulation of protein synthesis: a balancing act?

Authors:  Nektarios Tavernarakis
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 2.  A Ribosomal Perspective on Proteostasis and Aging.

Authors:  Kristan K Steffen; Andrew Dillin
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 3.  Dietary interventions to extend life span and health span based on calorie restriction.

Authors:  Robin K Minor; Joanne S Allard; Caitlin M Younts; Theresa M Ward; Rafael de Cabo
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 4.  Cultivation strategies to enhance productivity of Pichia pastoris: A review.

Authors:  V Looser; B Bruhlmann; F Bumbak; C Stenger; M Costa; A Camattari; D Fotiadis; K Kovar
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 14.227

5.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Replicative Lifespan in 4,698 Single-Gene Deletion Strains Uncovers Conserved Mechanisms of Aging.

Authors:  Mark A McCormick; Joe R Delaney; Mitsuhiro Tsuchiya; Scott Tsuchiyama; Anna Shemorry; Sylvia Sim; Annie Chia-Zong Chou; Umema Ahmed; Daniel Carr; Christopher J Murakami; Jennifer Schleit; George L Sutphin; Brian M Wasko; Christopher F Bennett; Adrienne M Wang; Brady Olsen; Richard P Beyer; Theodor K Bammler; Donna Prunkard; Simon C Johnson; Juniper K Pennypacker; Elroy An; Arieanna Anies; Anthony S Castanza; Eunice Choi; Nick Dang; Shiena Enerio; Marissa Fletcher; Lindsay Fox; Sarani Goswami; Sean A Higgins; Molly A Holmberg; Di Hu; Jessica Hui; Monika Jelic; Ki-Soo Jeong; Elijah Johnston; Emily O Kerr; Jin Kim; Diana Kim; Katie Kirkland; Shannon Klum; Soumya Kotireddy; Eric Liao; Michael Lim; Michael S Lin; Winston C Lo; Dan Lockshon; Hillary A Miller; Richard M Moller; Brian Muller; Jonathan Oakes; Diana N Pak; Zhao Jun Peng; Kim M Pham; Tom G Pollard; Prarthana Pradeep; Dillon Pruett; Dilreet Rai; Brett Robison; Ariana A Rodriguez; Bopharoth Ros; Michael Sage; Manpreet K Singh; Erica D Smith; Katie Snead; Amrita Solanky; Benjamin L Spector; Kristan K Steffen; Bie Nga Tchao; Marc K Ting; Helen Vander Wende; Dennis Wang; K Linnea Welton; Eric A Westman; Rachel B Brem; Xin-Guang Liu; Yousin Suh; Zhongjun Zhou; Matt Kaeberlein; Brian K Kennedy
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 6.  tRNA dynamics between the nucleus, cytoplasm and mitochondrial surface: Location, location, location.

Authors:  Kunal Chatterjee; Regina T Nostramo; Yao Wan; Anita K Hopper
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.490

Review 7.  CRISPR/Cas system for yeast genome engineering: advances and applications.

Authors:  Vratislav Stovicek; Carina Holkenbrink; Irina Borodina
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Insights into the Conserved Regulatory Mechanisms of Human and Yeast Aging.

Authors:  Rashmi Dahiya; Taj Mohammad; Mohamed F Alajmi; Md Tabish Rehman; Gulam Mustafa Hasan; Afzal Hussain; Md Imtaiyaz Hassan
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-06-09

9.  Production of a recombinant peroxidase in different glyco-engineered Pichia pastoris strains: a morphological and physiological comparison.

Authors:  Alexander Pekarsky; Lukas Veiter; Vignesh Rajamanickam; Christoph Herwig; Clemens Grünwald-Gruber; Friedrich Altmann; Oliver Spadiut
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 5.328

Review 10.  Recent developments in yeast aging.

Authors:  Matt Kaeberlein; Christopher R Burtner; Brian K Kennedy
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.