Literature DB >> 31412460

Estimating domestic well locations and populations served in the contiguous U.S. for years 2000 and 2010.

Tyler D Johnson1, Kenneth Belitz2, Melissa A Lombard3.   

Abstract

Domestic wells provide drinking water supply for approximately 40 million people in the United States. Knowing the location of these wells, and the populations they serve, is important for identifying heavily used aquifers, locations susceptible to contamination, and populations potentially impacted by poor-quality groundwater. The 1990 census was the last nationally consistent survey of a home's source of water, and has not been surveyed since. This paper presents a method for projecting the population dependent on domestic wells for years after 1990, using information from the 1990 census along with population data from subsequent censuses. The method is based on the "domestic ratio" at the census block-group level, defined here as the number of households dependent on domestic wells divided by the total population. Analysis of 1990 data (>220,000 block-groups) indicates that the domestic ratio is a function of the household density. As household density increases, the domestic ratio decreases, once a household density threshold is met. The 1990 data were used to develop a relationship between household density and the domestic ratio. The fitted model, along with household density data from 2000 and 2010, was used to estimate domestic ratios for each decadal year. In turn, the number of households dependent on domestic wells was estimated at the block-group level for 2000 and 2010. High-resolution census-block population data were used to refine the spatial distribution of domestic-well usage and to convert the data into population numbers. The results are presented in two downloadable raster datasets for each decadal year. It is estimated that the total population using domestic-well water in the contiguous U.S. increased 1.5% from 1990 to 2000 to a total of 37.25 million people and increased slightly from 2000 to 2010 to 37.29 million people. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Census; Cumulative distribution function; Data-binning; Domestic well; Private well; Water use

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31412460     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  8 in total

1.  In utero exposure to arsenite contributes to metabolic and reproductive dysfunction in male offspring of CD-1 mice.

Authors:  Karina F Rodriguez; Namya Mellouk; Erica K Ungewitter; Barbara Nicol; Chang Liu; Paula R Brown; Cynthia J Willson; Humphrey H-C Yao
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Regional Scale Assessment of Shallow Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination from Unconventional Hydrocarbon Extraction.

Authors:  Mario A Soriano; Nicole C Deziel; James E Saiers
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 11.357

3.  Natural and Anthropogenic Processes Affecting Domestic Groundwater Quality within the Northwestern Appalachian Basin.

Authors:  H G Siegel; M A Soriano; C J Clark; N P Johnson; H G Wulsin; N C Deziel; D L Plata; T H Darrah; J E Saiers
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 11.357

4.  Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Catherine M Bulka; Molly Scannell Bryan; Melissa A Lombard; Scott M Bartell; Daniel K Jones; Paul M Bradley; Veronica M Vieira; Debra T Silverman; Michael Focazio; Patricia L Toccalino; Johnni Daniel; Lorraine C Backer; Joseph D Ayotte; Matthew O Gribble; Maria Argos
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 13.352

5.  Examining Relationships Between Groundwater Nitrate Concentrations in Drinking Water and Landscape Characteristics to Understand Health Risks.

Authors:  Q F Hamlin; S L Martin; A D Kendall; D W Hyndman
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2022-05-01

6.  Associations between private well water and community water supply arsenic concentrations in the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Maya Spaur; Melissa A Lombard; Joseph D Ayotte; David E Harvey; Benjamin C Bostick; Steven N Chillrud; Ana Navas-Acien; Anne E Nigra
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 10.753

7.  Methods for Estimating Locations of Housing Units Served by Private Domestic Wells in the United States Applied to 2010.

Authors:  Andrew Murray; Alexander Hall; James Weaver; Fran Kremer
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2021-10

8.  Machine Learning Models of Arsenic in Private Wells Throughout the Conterminous United States As a Tool for Exposure Assessment in Human Health Studies.

Authors:  Melissa A Lombard; Molly Scannell Bryan; Daniel K Jones; Catherine Bulka; Paul M Bradley; Lorraine C Backer; Michael J Focazio; Debra T Silverman; Patricia Toccalino; Maria Argos; Matthew O Gribble; Joseph D Ayotte
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 9.028

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.