Literature DB >> 25449801

Ultrasound and microbubble mediated drug delivery: acoustic pressure as determinant for uptake via membrane pores or endocytosis.

Ine De Cock1, Elisa Zagato2, Kevin Braeckmans2, Ying Luan3, Nico de Jong3, Stefaan C De Smedt4, Ine Lentacker2.   

Abstract

Although promising results are achieved in ultrasound mediated drug delivery, its underlying biophysical mechanisms remain to be elucidated. Pore formation as well as endocytosis has been reported during ultrasound application. Due to the plethora of ultrasound settings used in literature, it is extremely difficult to draw conclusions on which mechanism is actually involved. To our knowledge, we are the first to show that acoustic pressure influences which route of drug uptake is addressed, by inducing different microbubble-cell interactions. To investigate this, FITC-dextrans were used as model drugs and their uptake was analyzed by flow cytometry. In fluorescence intensity plots, two subpopulations arose in cells with FITC-dextran uptake after ultrasound application, corresponding to cells having either low or high uptake. Following separation of the subpopulations by FACS sorting, confocal images indicated that the low uptake population showed endocytic uptake. The high uptake population represented uptake via pores. Moreover, the distribution of the subpopulations shifted to the high uptake population with increasing acoustic pressure. Real-time confocal recordings during ultrasound revealed that membrane deformation by microbubbles may be the trigger for endocytosis via mechanostimulation of the cytoskeleton. Pore formation was shown to be caused by microbubbles propelled towards the cell. These results provide a better insight in the role of acoustic pressure in microbubble-cell interactions and the possible consequences for drug uptake. In addition, it pinpoints the need for a more rational, microbubble behavior based choice of acoustic parameters in ultrasound mediated drug delivery experiments.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic pressure; Drug delivery; Endocytosis; Microbubbles; Sonoporation; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25449801     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  46 in total

Review 1.  In vitro methods to study bubble-cell interactions: Fundamentals and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Ine De Cock; Constantin C Coussios; Ine Lentacker; Séverine Le Gac; Eleanor Stride; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Laser-Activated Polymeric Microcapsules for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy: In Vitro Feasibility.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Tom van Rooij; Ilya Skachkov; Emilie Blazejewski; Gert Veldhuis; Nico de Jong; Klazina Kooiman; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Layered acoustofluidic resonators for the simultaneous optical and acoustic characterisation of cavitation dynamics, microstreaming, and biological effects.

Authors:  V Pereno; M Aron; O Vince; C Mannaris; A Seth; M de Saint Victor; G Lajoinie; M Versluis; C Coussios; D Carugo; E Stride
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Effects of the microbubble shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-mediated drug delivery to the brain.

Authors:  Shih-Ying Wu; Cherry C Chen; Yao-Sheng Tung; Oluyemi O Olumolade; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Mechanistic Insight into Sonoporation with Ultrasound-Stimulated Polymer Microbubbles.

Authors:  Brandon L Helfield; Xucai Chen; Bin Qin; Simon C Watkins; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Ultrasound-induced molecular delivery to erythrocytes using a microfluidic system.

Authors:  Connor S Centner; Emily M Murphy; Mariah C Priddy; John T Moore; Brett R Janis; Michael A Menze; Andrew P DeFilippis; Jonathan A Kopechek
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Ultrasound Imaging of Microbubble Activity during Sonoporation Pulse Sequences.

Authors:  Sara Keller; Matthew Bruce; Michalakis A Averkiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Multiparameter evaluation of in vivo gene delivery using ultrasound-guided, microbubble-enhanced sonoporation.

Authors:  Galina Shapiro; Andrew W Wong; Maxim Bez; Fang Yang; Sarah Tam; Lisa Even; Dmitriy Sheyn; Shiran Ben-David; Wafa Tawackoli; Gadi Pelled; Katherine W Ferrara; Dan Gazit
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Microbubbles and ultrasound increase intraventricular polyplex gene transfer to the brain.

Authors:  James-Kevin Y Tan; Binhan Pham; Yujin Zong; Camilo Perez; Don O Maris; Ashton Hemphill; Carol H Miao; Thomas J Matula; Pierre D Mourad; Hua Wei; Drew L Sellers; Philip J Horner; Suzie H Pun
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 9.776

10.  Prolonging pulse duration in ultrasound-mediated gene delivery lowers acoustic pressure threshold for efficient gene transfer to cells and small animals.

Authors:  Dominic M Tran; James Harrang; Shuxian Song; Jeremy Chen; Bryn M Smith; Carol H Miao
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.