Literature DB >> 16990673

Microbubble contrast agent with focused ultrasound to create brain lesions at low power levels: MR imaging and histologic study in rabbits.

Nathan J McDannold1, Natalia I Vykhodtseva, Kullervo Hynynen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based thermometry for predicting the onset and spatial extent of lesions produced by focused ultrasound combined with a microbubble contrast agent (Optison; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wis) and to compare the resulting induced temperature increase and threshold for damage with those in studies performed without the agent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The experiments were approved by the animal care committee. Fifty-three locations in the brains of 15 rabbits were sonicated with various exposure parameters by using a 1.5-MHz focused ultrasound transducer. MR imaging was used to map the temperature rise and, along with light microscopy, to examine the lesions. Diameters of isotherms created from thermometry were compared with the resulting lesions by using Bland-Altman analysis and linear regression. The minimum acoustic power necessary for lesion creation was determined, and the apparent temperature threshold for damage was calculated with probit analysis. These thresholds were compared with prior work performed without the contrast agent. The heating induced with the microbubbles was compared with that in sonications performed without them by using a t test.
RESULTS: The MR imaging-mapped temperature distributions matched the shape of the lesions. The diameters of isotherms correlated well with diameters measured at contrast material-enhanced MR imaging (mean difference between measurements, 0.0 mm +/- 0.5; R = 0.93). The temperature increase with microbubbles was statistically larger (P < .01) than for sonications performed without microbubbles. In some locations (mostly continuous wave exposures), damage was observed along the ultrasound beam path. The time-averaged acoustic power damage threshold was reduced by 91% for 10-second exposures when compared with earlier studies performed without microbubbles. The probability of producing lesions was 50% at a temperature increase of 5.9 degrees C, 5.5 degrees C lower than was observed earlier without the agent.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging-based temperature measurements appeared to correlate with focused ultrasound-induced lesions in the brain when microbubbles were present, even though the temperature appeared to be below the threshold for thermal damage. (c) RSNA, 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16990673     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2411051170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  65 in total

1.  Generation and detection of plasmonic nanobubbles in zebrafish.

Authors:  E Y Lukianova-Hleb; C Santiago; D S Wagner; J H Hafner; D O Lapotko
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.874

2.  Ultrasound-mediated tumor imaging and nanotherapy using drug loaded, block copolymer stabilized perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Natalya Rapoport; Kweon-Ho Nam; Roohi Gupta; Zhongao Gao; Praveena Mohan; Allison Payne; Nick Todd; Xin Liu; Taeho Kim; Jill Shea; Courtney Scaife; Dennis L Parker; Eun-Kee Jeong; Anne M Kennedy
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Blood-brain barrier: real-time feedback-controlled focused ultrasound disruption by using an acoustic emissions-based controller.

Authors:  Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Ultrasound enhanced drug delivery to the brain and central nervous system.

Authors:  Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.914

5.  Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature.

Authors:  Gregory J Czarnota; Raffi Karshafian; Peter N Burns; Shun Wong; Azza Al Mahrouki; Justin W Lee; Amanda Caissie; William Tran; Christina Kim; Melissa Furukawa; Emily Wong; Anoja Giles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Enhancing cell kill in vitro from hyperthermia through pre-sensitizing with ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  A review of low-intensity ultrasound for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrew K W Wood; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Cavitation-enhanced nonthermal ablation in deep brain targets: feasibility in a large animal model.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Ferenc Jolesz; Margaret Livingstone; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Targeted drug delivery with focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening using acoustically-activated nanodroplets.

Authors:  Cherry C Chen; Paul S Sheeran; Shih-Ying Wu; Oluyemi O Olumolade; Paul A Dayton; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 10.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Muna Aryal; Costas D Arvanitis; Phillip M Alexander; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.