Literature DB >> 33978290

Low amounts of heavy water increase the phase separation propensity of a fragment of the androgen receptor activation domain.

Stasė Bielskutė1,2, Carla Garcia-Cabau1,2, Marta Frigolé-Vivas1,2, Elzbieta Szulc1,2, Eva De Mol1,2, Mireia Pesarrodona1,2, Jesús García1,2, Xavier Salvatella1,2,3.   

Abstract

The phase equilibria of intrinsically disordered proteins are exquisitely sensitive to changes in solution conditions and this can be used to investigate the driving forces of phase separation in vitro as well as the biological roles of phase transitions in live cells. Here we investigate how using D2 O as co-solvent in an aqueous buffer changes the phase equilibrium of a fragment of the activation domain of the androgen receptor, a transcription factor that plays a role in the development of the male phenotype and is a therapeutic target for castration resistant prostate cancer. We show how replacing even small fractions of H2 O with D2 O increases the propensity of this fragment to undergo liquid-liquid phase separation, likely reflecting a stabilization of the hydrophobic interactions that drive condensation. Our results indicate that it is necessary to take this effect into consideration when studying phase separation phenomena with biophysical methods that require using D2 O as a co-solvent. In addition, they suggest that additions of D2 O may be used to enhance phase separation phenomena in cells, facilitating their observation.
© 2021 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D2O; LCST; NMR; androgen receptor; intrinsically disordered protein; liquid-liquid phase separation; transcription factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33978290      PMCID: PMC8197436          DOI: 10.1002/pro.4110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.993


  41 in total

1.  Characterization of the two coactivator-interacting surfaces of the androgen receptor and their relative role in transcriptional control.

Authors:  Valerie Christiaens; Charlotte L Bevan; Leen Callewaert; Anna Haelens; Guy Verrijdt; Wilfried Rombauts; Frank Claessens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains.

Authors:  Erik W Martin; Alex S Holehouse; Ivan Peran; Mina Farag; J Jeremias Incicco; Anne Bremer; Christy R Grace; Andrea Soranno; Rohit V Pappu; Tanja Mittag
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Relationship of Sequence and Phase Separation in Protein Low-Complexity Regions.

Authors:  Erik W Martin; Tanja Mittag
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes.

Authors:  F Delaglio; S Grzesiek; G W Vuister; G Zhu; J Pfeifer; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Suppression of microtubule dynamic instability and treadmilling by deuterium oxide.

Authors:  D Panda; G Chakrabarti; J Hudson; K Pigg; H P Miller; L Wilson; R H Himes
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 6.  Intranuclear organization and function of the androgen receptor.

Authors:  Ben E Black; Bryce M Paschal
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.015

7.  Regulation of Androgen Receptor Activity by Transient Interactions of Its Transactivation Domain with General Transcription Regulators.

Authors:  Eva De Mol; Elzbieta Szulc; Claudio Di Sanza; Paula Martínez-Cristóbal; Carlos W Bertoncini; R Bryn Fenwick; Marta Frigolé-Vivas; Marianela Masín; Irene Hunter; Víctor Buzón; Isabelle Brun-Heath; Jesús García; Gianni De Fabritiis; Eva Estébanez-Perpiñá; Iain J McEwan; Ángel R Nebreda; Xavier Salvatella
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Molecular interactions underlying liquid-liquid phase separation of the FUS low-complexity domain.

Authors:  Anastasia C Murthy; Gregory L Dignon; Yelena Kan; Gül H Zerze; Sapun H Parekh; Jeetain Mittal; Nicolas L Fawzi
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  Residue-specific identification of phase separation hot spots of Alzheimer's-related protein tau.

Authors:  Susmitha Ambadipudi; Jithender G Reddy; Jacek Biernat; Eckhard Mandelkow; Markus Zweckstetter
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Cancer Mutations of the Tumor Suppressor SPOP Disrupt the Formation of Active, Phase-Separated Compartments.

Authors:  Jill J Bouchard; Joel H Otero; Daniel C Scott; Elzbieta Szulc; Erik W Martin; Nafiseh Sabri; Daniele Granata; Melissa R Marzahn; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Xavier Salvatella; Brenda A Schulman; Tanja Mittag
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 19.328

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Learning the chemical grammar of biomolecular condensates.

Authors:  Henry R Kilgore; Richard A Young
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 16.174

2.  Topological dynamics of an intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain of the human androgen receptor.

Authors:  Vahid Sheikhhassani; Barbara Scalvini; Julian Ng; Laurens W H J Heling; Yosri Ayache; Tom M J Evers; Eva Estébanez-Perpiñá; Iain J McEwan; Alireza Mashaghi
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Low amounts of heavy water increase the phase separation propensity of a fragment of the androgen receptor activation domain.

Authors:  Stasė Bielskutė; Carla Garcia-Cabau; Marta Frigolé-Vivas; Elzbieta Szulc; Eva De Mol; Mireia Pesarrodona; Jesús García; Xavier Salvatella
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Temporal and spatial characterisation of protein liquid-liquid phase separation using NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jack E Bramham; Alexander P Golovanov
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 17.694

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.