Literature DB >> 31270472

Molecular interactions underlying liquid-liquid phase separation of the FUS low-complexity domain.

Anastasia C Murthy1, Gregory L Dignon2, Yelena Kan3,4, Gül H Zerze2,5, Sapun H Parekh4,6, Jeetain Mittal7, Nicolas L Fawzi8.   

Abstract

The low-complexity domain of the RNA-binding protein FUS (FUS LC) mediates liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), but the interactions between the repetitive SYGQ-rich sequence of FUS LC that stabilize the liquid phase are not known in detail. By combining NMR and Raman spectroscopy, mutagenesis, and molecular simulation, we demonstrate that heterogeneous interactions involving all residue types underlie LLPS of human FUS LC. We find no evidence that FUS LC adopts conformations with traditional secondary structure elements in the condensed phase; rather, it maintains conformational heterogeneity. We show that hydrogen bonding, π/sp2, and hydrophobic interactions all contribute to stabilizing LLPS of FUS LC. In addition to contributions from tyrosine residues, we find that glutamine residues also participate in contacts leading to LLPS of FUS LC. These results support a model in which FUS LC forms dynamic, multivalent interactions via multiple residue types and remains disordered in the densely packed liquid phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31270472      PMCID: PMC6613800          DOI: 10.1038/s41594-019-0250-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol        ISSN: 1545-9985            Impact factor:   15.369


  58 in total

1.  Probing exchange kinetics and atomic resolution dynamics in high-molecular-weight complexes using dark-state exchange saturation transfer NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Nicolas L Fawzi; Jinfa Ying; Dennis A Torchia; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  CPMG sequences with enhanced sensitivity to chemical exchange.

Authors:  C Wang; M J Grey; A G Palmer
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  A yeast functional screen predicts new candidate ALS disease genes.

Authors:  Julien Couthouis; Michael P Hart; James Shorter; Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez; Renske Erion; Rachel Oristano; Annie X Liu; Daniel Ramos; Niti Jethava; Divya Hosangadi; James Epstein; Ashley Chiang; Zamia Diaz; Tadashi Nakaya; Fadia Ibrahim; Hyung-Jun Kim; Jennifer A Solski; Kelly L Williams; Jelena Mojsilovic-Petrovic; Caroline Ingre; Kevin Boylan; Neill R Graff-Radford; Dennis W Dickson; Dana Clay-Falcone; Lauren Elman; Leo McCluskey; Robert Greene; Robert G Kalb; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski; Albert Ludolph; Wim Robberecht; Peter M Andersen; Garth A Nicholson; Ian P Blair; Oliver D King; Nancy M Bonini; Vivianna Van Deerlin; Rosa Rademakers; Zissimos Mourelatos; Aaron D Gitler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes.

Authors:  F Delaglio; S Grzesiek; G W Vuister; G Zhu; J Pfeifer; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  FUS/TLS forms cytoplasmic aggregates, inhibits cell growth and interacts with TDP-43 in a yeast model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Dmitry Kryndushkin; Reed B Wickner; Frank Shewmaker
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 14.870

6.  Phase behaviour of disordered proteins underlying low density and high permeability of liquid organelles.

Authors:  Ming-Tzo Wei; Shana Elbaum-Garfinkle; Alex S Holehouse; Carlos Chih-Hsiung Chen; Marina Feric; Craig B Arnold; Rodney D Priestley; Rohit V Pappu; Clifford P Brangwynne
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 24.427

7.  Atomic-resolution dynamics on the surface of amyloid-β protofibrils probed by solution NMR.

Authors:  Nicolas L Fawzi; Jinfa Ying; Rodolfo Ghirlando; Dennis A Torchia; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Phase transition of a disordered nuage protein generates environmentally responsive membraneless organelles.

Authors:  Timothy J Nott; Evangelia Petsalaki; Patrick Farber; Dylan Jervis; Eden Fussner; Anne Plochowietz; Timothy D Craggs; David P Bazett-Jones; Tony Pawson; Julie D Forman-Kay; Andrew J Baldwin
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Intrinsically disordered sequences enable modulation of protein phase separation through distributed tyrosine motifs.

Authors:  Yuan Lin; Simon L Currie; Michael K Rosen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Tau protein liquid-liquid phase separation can initiate tau aggregation.

Authors:  Susanne Wegmann; Bahareh Eftekharzadeh; Katharina Tepper; Katarzyna M Zoltowska; Rachel E Bennett; Simon Dujardin; Pawel R Laskowski; Danny MacKenzie; Tarun Kamath; Caitlin Commins; Charles Vanderburg; Allyson D Roe; Zhanyun Fan; Amandine M Molliex; Amayra Hernandez-Vega; Daniel Muller; Anthony A Hyman; Eckhard Mandelkow; J Paul Taylor; Bradley T Hyman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  133 in total

1.  Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Physiology and Pathophysiology of the Nervous System.

Authors:  Yasunori Hayashi; Lenzie K Ford; Luana Fioriti; Leeanne McGurk; Mingjie Zhang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Micellar TIA1 with folded RNA binding domains as a model for reversible stress granule formation.

Authors:  Keith J Fritzsching; Yizhuo Yang; Emily M Pogue; Joseph B Rayman; Eric R Kandel; Ann E McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Interaction hot spots for phase separation revealed by NMR studies of a CAPRIN1 condensed phase.

Authors:  Tae Hun Kim; Brandon J Payliss; Michael L Nosella; Ian T W Lee; Yuki Toyama; Julie D Forman-Kay; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparative roles of charge, π, and hydrophobic interactions in sequence-dependent phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Suman Das; Yi-Hsuan Lin; Robert M Vernon; Julie D Forman-Kay; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Refining All-Atom Protein Force Fields for Polar-Rich, Prion-like, Low-Complexity Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Wai Shing Tang; Nicolas L Fawzi; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  The (un)structural biology of biomolecular liquid-liquid phase separation using NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Anastasia C Murthy; Nicolas L Fawzi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Identifying sequence perturbations to an intrinsically disordered protein that determine its phase-separation behavior.

Authors:  Benjamin S Schuster; Gregory L Dignon; Wai Shing Tang; Fleurie M Kelley; Aishwarya Kanchi Ranganath; Craig N Jahnke; Alison G Simpkins; Roshan Mammen Regy; Daniel A Hammer; Matthew C Good; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Biomolecular condensates at the nexus of cellular stress, protein aggregation disease and ageing.

Authors:  Simon Alberti; Anthony A Hyman
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 9.  Biomolecular Phase Separation: From Molecular Driving Forces to Macroscopic Properties.

Authors:  Gregory L Dignon; Robert B Best; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 12.703

10.  Hydropathy Patterning Complements Charge Patterning to Describe Conformational Preferences of Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Wenwei Zheng; Gregory Dignon; Matthew Brown; Young C Kim; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 6.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.