Pegah Askari1,2, Ivan E Dimitrov1,3, Sandeep K Ganji4,5, Vivek Tiwari1, Michael Levy6, Toral R Patel6,7,8, Edward Pan7,9, Bruce E Mickey6,9,10, Craig R Malloy1,5,11, Elizabeth A Maher7,9,10,12, Changho Choi1,5,9. 1. Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. 2. Joint Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering at University of Texas Arlington and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, USA. 3. Philips Healthcare, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 4. Philips Healthcare, Andover, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. 6. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. 7. Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. 9. Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. 10. Annette G. Strauss Center for Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. 11. Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, USA. 12. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: 1 H MRS provides a noninvasive tool for identifying mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH). Quantification of the prominent 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) resonance at 2.25 ppm is often confounded by the lipid resonance at the same frequency in tumors with elevated lipids. We propose a new spectral fitting approach to separate these overlapped signals, therefore, improving 2HG evaluation. METHODS: TE 97 ms PRESS was acquired at 3T from 42 glioma patients. New lipid basis sets were created, in which the small lipid 2.25-ppm signal strength was preset with reference to the lipid signal at 0.9 ppm, incorporating published fat relaxation data. LCModel fitting using the new lipid bases (Fitting method 2) was conducted along with fitting using the LCModel built-in lipid basis set (Fitting method 1), in which the lipid 2.25-ppm signal is assessed with reference to the lipid 1.3-ppm signal. In-house basis spectra of low-molecular-weight metabolites were used in both fitting methods. RESULTS: Fitting method 2 showed marked improvement in identifying IDH mutational status compared with Fitting method 1. 2HG estimates from Fitting method 2 were overall smaller than those from Fitting method 1, which was because of differential assignment of the signal at 2.25 ppm to lipids. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, Fitting method 2 provided a complete distinction between IDH mutation and wild-type whereas Fitting method 1 did not. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that 1 H MR spectral fitting using the new lipid basis set provides a robust fitting strategy that improves 2HG evaluation in brain tumors with elevated lipids.
PURPOSE: 1 H MRS provides a noninvasive tool for identifying mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH). Quantification of the prominent 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) resonance at 2.25 ppm is often confounded by the lipid resonance at the same frequency in tumors with elevated lipids. We propose a new spectral fitting approach to separate these overlapped signals, therefore, improving 2HG evaluation. METHODS: TE 97 ms PRESS was acquired at 3T from 42 glioma patients. New lipid basis sets were created, in which the small lipid 2.25-ppm signal strength was preset with reference to the lipid signal at 0.9 ppm, incorporating published fat relaxation data. LCModel fitting using the new lipid bases (Fitting method 2) was conducted along with fitting using the LCModel built-in lipid basis set (Fitting method 1), in which the lipid 2.25-ppm signal is assessed with reference to the lipid 1.3-ppm signal. In-house basis spectra of low-molecular-weight metabolites were used in both fitting methods. RESULTS: Fitting method 2 showed marked improvement in identifying IDH mutational status compared with Fitting method 1. 2HG estimates from Fitting method 2 were overall smaller than those from Fitting method 1, which was because of differential assignment of the signal at 2.25 ppm to lipids. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, Fitting method 2 provided a complete distinction between IDH mutation and wild-type whereas Fitting method 1 did not. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that 1 H MR spectral fitting using the new lipid basis set provides a robust fitting strategy that improves 2HG evaluation in brain tumors with elevated lipids.
Authors: Ivan E Dimitrov; Deborah Douglas; Jimin Ren; Nadine B Smith; Andrew G Webb; A Dean Sherry; Craig R Malloy Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Akshay Madan; Sandeep K Ganji; Zhongxu An; Kevin S Choe; Marco C Pinho; Robert M Bachoo; Elizabeth M Maher; Changho Choi Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ovidiu C Andronesi; Grace S Kim; Elizabeth Gerstner; Tracy Batchelor; Aria A Tzika; Valeria R Fantin; Matthew G Vander Heiden; A Gregory Sorensen Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Alan J Wright; Greg A Fellows; John R Griffiths; M Wilson; B Anthony Bell; Franklyn A Howe Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler Journal: Science Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Changho Choi; Sandeep K Ganji; Ralph J DeBerardinis; Kimmo J Hatanpaa; Dinesh Rakheja; Zoltan Kovacs; Xiao-Li Yang; Tomoyuki Mashimo; Jack M Raisanen; Isaac Marin-Valencia; Juan M Pascual; Christopher J Madden; Bruce E Mickey; Craig R Malloy; Robert M Bachoo; Elizabeth A Maher Journal: Nat Med Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Elisabeth Bumes; Claudia Fellner; Franz A Fellner; Karin Fleischanderl; Martina Häckl; Stefan Lenz; Ralf Linker; Tim Mirus; Peter J Oefner; Christian Paar; Martin Andreas Proescholdt; Markus J Riemenschneider; Katharina Rosengarth; Serge Weis; Christina Wendl; Sibylle Wimmer; Peter Hau; Wolfram Gronwald; Markus Hutterer Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 6.575