Literature DB >> 21538631

MR-visible lipids and the tumor microenvironment.

E James Delikatny1, Sanjeev Chawla, Daniel-Joseph Leung, Harish Poptani.   

Abstract

MR-visible lipids or mobile lipids are defined as lipids that are observable using proton MRS in cells and tissues. These MR-visible lipids are composed of triglycerides and cholesterol esters that accumulate in neutral lipid droplets, where their MR visibility is conferred as a result of the increased molecular motion available in this unique physical environment. This review discusses the factors that lead to the biogenesis of MR-visible lipids in cancer cells and in other cell types, such as immune cells and fibroblasts. We focus on the accumulations of mobile lipids that are inducible in cultured cells by a number of stresses, including culture conditions, and in response to activating stimuli or apoptotic cell death induced by anticancer drugs. This is compared with animal tumor models, where increases in mobile lipids are observed in response to chemo- and radiotherapy, and to human tumors, where mobile lipids are observed predominantly in high-grade brain tumors and in regions of necrosis. Conducive conditions for mobile lipid formation in the tumor microenvironment are discussed, including low pH, oxygen availability and the presence of inflammatory cells. It is concluded that MR-visible lipids appear in cancer cells and human tumors as a stress response. Mobile lipids stored as neutral lipid droplets may play a role in the detoxification of the cell or act as an alternative energy source, especially in cancer cells, which often grow in ischemic/hypoxic environments. The role of MR-visible lipids in cancer diagnosis and the assessment of the treatment response in both animal models of cancer and human brain tumors is also discussed. Although technical limitations exist in the accurate detection of intratumoral mobile lipids, early increases in mobile lipids after therapeutic interventions may be useful as a potential biomarker for the assessment of treatment response in cancer.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21538631      PMCID: PMC3640643          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  154 in total

1.  1-H and 13-C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of the lipids in normal and SV 40 virus-transformed hamster embryo fibroblast membranes.

Authors:  C L Nicolau; W Dietrich; M R Steiner; S Steiner; J L Melnick
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-03-25

2.  Proton MR spectroscopy and preoperative diagnostic accuracy: an evaluation of intracranial mass lesions characterized by stereotactic biopsy findings.

Authors:  I M Burtscher; G Skagerberg; B Geijer; E Englund; F Ståhlberg; S Holtås
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Histochemical probes for the detection of hypoxic tumour cells.

Authors:  I Freitas; P Pontiggia; S Barni; V Bertone; M Parente; A Novarina; G Roveta; G Gerzeli; P Stoward
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 4.  Tumor pH and its measurement.

Authors:  Xiaomeng Zhang; Yuxiang Lin; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Biogenesis of cytoplasmic lipid droplets: from the lipid ester globule in the membrane to the visible structure.

Authors:  Yuki Ohsaki; Jinglei Cheng; Michitaka Suzuki; Yuki Shinohara; Akikazu Fujita; Toyoshi Fujimoto
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-10-21

6.  A role for taurine in mitochondrial function.

Authors:  Svend Høime Hansen; Mogens Larsen Andersen; Claus Cornett; Robert Gradinaru; Niels Grunnet
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 8.410

7.  Preinvasive and invasive cervical cancer: an ex vivo proton magic angle spinning magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Marrita M Mahon; Nandita M deSouza; Roberto Dina; W Patrick Soutter; G Angus McIndoe; Andreanna D Williams; I Jane Cox
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  In vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro one- and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of an intracerebral glioma in rat brain: assignment of resonances.

Authors:  C Rémy; C Arús; A Ziegler; E S Lai; A Moreno; Y Le Fur; M Décorps
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.372

9.  Modulation of MR-visible mobile lipid levels by cell culture conditions and correlations with chemotactic response.

Authors:  E J Delikatny; C M Lander; T M Jeitner; R Hancock; C E Mountford
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1996-01-17       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Lipid droplet biogenesis induced by stress involves triacylglycerol synthesis that depends on group VIA phospholipase A2.

Authors:  Albert Gubern; Miquel Barceló-Torns; Javier Casas; David Barneda; Roser Masgrau; Fernando Picatoste; Jesús Balsinde; María A Balboa; Enrique Claro
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  The dynamic roles of intracellular lipid droplets: from archaea to mammals.

Authors:  Denis J Murphy
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 2.  Acidosis and cancer: from mechanism to neutralization.

Authors:  Arig Ibrahim-Hashim; Veronica Estrella
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 9.264

3.  Malignancy prediction among tissues from Oral SCC patients including neck invasions: a 1H HRMAS NMR based metabolomic study.

Authors:  Anup Paul; Shatakshi Srivastava; Raja Roy; Akshay Anand; Kushagra Gaurav; Nuzhat Husain; Sudha Jain; Abhinav A Sonkar
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.290

4.  Hepatic lipid composition differs between ob/ob and ob/+ control mice as determined by using in vivo localized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Qiong Ye; Carsten Friedrich Danzer; Alexander Fuchs; Christian Wolfrum; Markus Rudin
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Direct inhibition of choline kinase by a near-infrared fluorescent carbocyanine.

Authors:  Sean P Arlauckas; Anatoliy V Popov; Edward J Delikatny
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  OKN-007 decreases tumor necrosis and tumor cell proliferation and increases apoptosis in a preclinical F98 rat glioma model.

Authors:  Patricia Coutinho de Souza; Krithika Balasubramanian; Charity Njoku; Natalyia Smith; David L Gillespie; Andrea Schwager; Osama Abdullah; Jerry W Ritchey; Kar-Ming Fung; Debra Saunders; Randy L Jensen; Rheal A Towner
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Preliminary observations and clinical value of lipid peak in high-grade uterine sarcomas using in vivo proton MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Mayumi Takeuchi; Kenji Matsuzaki; Masafumi Harada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Quantitative in vivo proton MR spectroscopic assessment of lipid metabolism: Value for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  Sunitha B Thakur; Joao V Horvat; Ileana Hancu; Olivia M Sutton; Blanca Bernard-Davila; Michael Weber; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Adele Marino; Daly Avendano; Doris Leithner; Sandra Brennan; Dilip Giri; Elizabeth Manderski; Elizabeth A Morris; Katja Pinker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Metabolic profile of PML lesions in patients with and without IRIS: an observational study.

Authors:  Sarah Gheuens; Long Ngo; Xiaoen Wang; David C Alsop; Robert E Lenkinski; Igor J Koralnik
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  Emerging MRI Techniques to Redefine Treatment Response in Patients With Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Fabrício Guimarães Gonçalves; Sanjeev Chawla; Suyash Mohan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.