Literature DB >> 33967283

Choosing which metrics to use when reporting antimicrobial use information to veterinarians in the Canadian swine industry.

Angelina L Bosman1, Anne E Deckert1, Carolee A Carson1, Richard J Reid-Smith1, Zvonimir Poljak1, Scott A McEwen1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences for various metrics and denominators among Canadian swine veterinarians, in order to improve reporting of antimicrobial use (AMU) information to these stakeholders and to facilitate enhanced stewardship decisions. An online survey was made available to swine veterinarians across Canada; 12 responses (estimated response rate 17.6%) were submitted and analyzed. Responses represented veterinarians from every major pig-producing province and from a range of year of graduation from veterinary college. Participants self-evaluated their understanding of dose-based metrics as higher than weight- and frequency-based metrics and interpreted most results of AMU analyses correctly. Participants preferred dose-based metrics over others, and had various objectives for AMU information, including improving AMU on their clients' farms and enabling comparisons with other farms. The results are useful to those making decisions about which AMU metrics to use in reports targeted to swine veterinarians. Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33967283      PMCID: PMC8048206     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Vet J        ISSN: 0008-5286            Impact factor:   1.008


  11 in total

Review 1.  Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sindre Rolstad; John Adler; Anna Rydén
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Quantitative and qualitative antimicrobial usage patterns in farrow-to-finish pig herds in Belgium, France, Germany and Sweden.

Authors:  M Sjölund; M Postma; L Collineau; S Lösken; A Backhans; C Belloc; U Emanuelson; E Groβe Beilage; K Stärk; J Dewulf
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Unconditional and conditional incentives differentially improved general practitioners' participation in an online survey: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jane M Young; Anna O'Halloran; Claire McAulay; Marie Pirotta; Kirsty Forsdike; Ingrid Stacey; David Currow
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Reported antibiotic use in 90 swine farms in Alberta.

Authors:  Andrijana Rajić; Richard Reid-Smith; Anne E Deckert; Catherine E Dewey; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  Metrics for quantifying antimicrobial use in beef feedlots.

Authors:  Katharine M Benedict; Sheryl P Gow; Richard J Reid-Smith; Calvin W Booker; Paul S Morley
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 6.  Evaluation of metrics for benchmarking antimicrobial use in the UK dairy industry.

Authors:  Harriet L Mills; Andrea Turner; Lisa Morgans; Jonathan Massey; Hannah Schubert; Gwen Rees; David Barrett; Andrew Dowsey; Kristen K Reyher
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 7.  Guidance on the Selection of Appropriate Indicators for Quantification of Antimicrobial Usage in Humans and Animals.

Authors:  L Collineau; C Belloc; K D C Stärk; A Hémonic; M Postma; J Dewulf; C Chauvin
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 2.702

8.  Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.

Authors:  Inese Grava-Gubins; Sarah Scott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  The use of antimicrobials in global pig production: A systematic review of methods for quantification.

Authors:  Angkana Lekagul; Viroj Tangcharoensathien; Shunmay Yeung
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  Consumption of antimicrobials in pigs, veal calves, and broilers in the Netherlands: quantitative results of nationwide collection of data in 2011.

Authors:  Marian E H Bos; Femke J Taverne; Ingeborg M van Geijlswijk; Johan W Mouton; Dik J Mevius; Dick J J Heederik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Antimicrobial use in lactating sows, piglets, nursery, and grower-finisher pigs on swine farms in Ontario, Canada during 2017 and 2018.

Authors:  Angelina L Bosman; Anne E Deckert; Carolee A Carson; Zvonimir Poljak; Richard J Reid-Smith; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-04-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.