Literature DB >> 27435645

Quantitative and qualitative antimicrobial usage patterns in farrow-to-finish pig herds in Belgium, France, Germany and Sweden.

M Sjölund1, M Postma2, L Collineau3, S Lösken4, A Backhans5, C Belloc6, U Emanuelson5, E Groβe Beilage4, K Stärk7, J Dewulf2.   

Abstract

Data on sales of antimicrobials using a standardised methodology have shown that there are vast differences between countries in amounts of antimicrobials sold for food-producing animals, but these data do not provide insight on how sales are distributed by species and age groups. The aim of this study was to compare herd level antimicrobial usage for pigs by age category, antimicrobial class and administration route for farrow-to-finish herds in four EU countries. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 227 farrow-to-finish pig herds with at least 100 sows and 500 finishing pigs in Belgium (n=47), France (n=60), Germany (n=60) and Sweden (n=60). Detailed information about the antimicrobial consumption for breeding and growing pigs was collected. Antimicrobial usage was quantified as active substance expressed as mg and then converted to treatment incidence (TI) based on Defined Daily Doses Animal per 1000 pig-days at risk. TIs varied between and within countries, herds and age groups. The Swedish herds had the lowest and the German herds the highest overall use. Most treatments were applied to weaned piglets except in the Swedish herds where treatments of suckling piglets were most frequent. Antimicrobials were most often applied through feed or water except in the Swedish herds where parenteral treatments were most frequent. Aminopenicillins was the antimicrobial class most commonly used. Use of third and fourth generation cephalosporins constituted 11% of use for the Belgian herds, which was higher compared to the other countries. There was a significant (p<0.01) association between the within-herd antimicrobial use across different age categories. This study has shown that there were large differences in antimicrobial use for pigs between countries, herds and age groups in farrow-to-finish herds of similar size when actual consumption data were compared. Collecting detailed usage data can be used to efficiently target high users in order to reduce antimicrobial consumption.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic; Antimicrobial consumption; Pig; Treatment incidence; Use

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27435645     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  37 in total

1.  Choosing which metrics to use when reporting antimicrobial use information to veterinarians in the Canadian swine industry.

Authors:  Angelina L Bosman; Anne E Deckert; Carolee A Carson; Richard J Reid-Smith; Zvonimir Poljak; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Stable antibiotic resistance and rapid human adaptation in livestock-associated MRSA.

Authors:  Marta Matuszewska; Gemma G R Murray; Xiaoliang Ba; Rhiannon Wood; Mark A Holmes; Lucy A Weinert
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  The association between measurements of antimicrobial use and resistance in the faeces microbiota of finisher batches.

Authors:  V D Andersen; L V DE Knegt; P Munk; M S Jensen; Y Agersø; F M Aarestrup; H Vigre
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Application of multiblock modelling to identify key drivers for antimicrobial use in pig production in four European countries.

Authors:  L Collineau; S Bougeard; A Backhans; J Dewulf; U Emanuelson; E Grosse Beilage; A Lehébel; S Lösken; M Postma; M Sjölund; K D C Stärk; V H M Visschers; C Belloc
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Antibiotic drug usage in pigs in Germany-Are the class profiles changing?

Authors:  Franziska Schaekel; Thomas May; Julia Seiler; Maria Hartmann; Lothar Kreienbrock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Antimicrobial use in Swedish farrow-to-finish pig herds is related to farmer characteristics.

Authors:  Annette Backhans; Marie Sjölund; Ann Lindberg; Ulf Emanuelson
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-08-01

7.  Comparison of Antimicrobial Consumption Patterns in the Swiss and Danish Cattle and Swine Production (2007-2013).

Authors:  Luís P Carmo; Liza R Nielsen; Lis Alban; Cedric R Müntener; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Ioannis Magouras
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

8.  Challenges facing the veterinary profession in Ireland: 2. On-farm use of veterinary antimicrobials.

Authors:  Manuel Magalhães-Sant'Ana; Simon J More; David B Morton; Alison J Hanlon
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.146

9.  Comparison of Quantification Methods to Estimate Farm-Level Usage of Antimicrobials Other than in Medicated Feed in Dairy Farms from Québec, Canada.

Authors:  Hélène Lardé; David Francoz; Jean-Philippe Roy; Jonathan Massé; Marie Archambault; Marie-Ève Paradis; Simon Dufour
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-20

10.  Reliable estimation of antimicrobial use and its evolution between 2010 and 2013 in French swine farms.

Authors:  Anne Hémonic; Claire Chauvin; Didier Delzescaux; Fabien Verliat; Isabelle Corrégé
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.