Literature DB >> 30389002

The use of antimicrobials in global pig production: A systematic review of methods for quantification.

Angkana Lekagul1, Viroj Tangcharoensathien2, Shunmay Yeung3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overuse of antimicrobials in both humans and animals is recognized as one of the main drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR); and the optimisation of their use has been advocated as a key strategy for dealing with AMR. The measurement of antimicrobial use is vital for the design, monitoring and evaluation of such strategies. This systematic review describes and compares methods and measurements used to quantify antimicrobial use in pigs in order to inform efforts to standardize measurement.
METHODS: The peer-reviewed literature was systematically searched using four online databases: MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review included: articles published in English, involving pigs of any age and types of production, providing quantitative data on antimicrobial use, containing a clear description of the methodology, and having moderate to high rank in the quality assessment.
RESULTS: Of 2,362 abstracts reviewed, a total of 25 studies were included based on the eligibility criteria. All studies were published between 2001 and 2017. Twenty of the studies were conducted in eight European countries. Twelve studies estimated antimicrobial use and eight studies were primarily methodological papers comparing different methods or variables, or developing new methods. The two main sources of antimicrobial use data were farm surveys and national sales data. A large variety of units of measurement was found. In this review, the ten measurements identified were categorized into four groups: 1) antimicrobials use measured by milligrams of active substance per animal weight; 2) antimicrobials use measured by daily dose per weight at treatment; 3) antimicrobial use measured by daily dose per treatment period; and 4) antimicrobials use measured by daily dose per period at risk of treatment.
CONCLUSION: There is no global standardized measurement of antimicrobial use in pigs. Given the importance of monitoring the use antimicrobials, we recommend that at a minimum, all countries should develop macro-level monitoring using national sales data and report use by milligram of active ingredients per Population Correcting Unit. Monitoring in specific animal species requires the development of systems to capture prescription at national or farm level. Findings from monitoring antimicrobial use may help to guide effective interventions for optimising use of antimicrobials, as recommended by the WHO Global Action Plan on AMR.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30389002     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  13 in total

1.  Choosing which metrics to use when reporting antimicrobial use information to veterinarians in the Canadian swine industry.

Authors:  Angelina L Bosman; Anne E Deckert; Carolee A Carson; Richard J Reid-Smith; Zvonimir Poljak; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Calculation of Antimicrobial Use Indicators in Beef Feedlots-Effects of Choice of Metric and Standardized Values.

Authors:  Stephanie A Brault; Sherry J Hannon; Sheryl P Gow; Simon J G Otto; Calvin W Booker; Paul S Morley
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-10-09

3.  Sales data as a measure of antibiotics usage: Concepts, examples and discussion of influencing factors.

Authors:  Roswitha Merle; Borris Meyer-Kühling
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-21

4.  Antimicrobial Usage Among Different Age Categories and Herd Sizes in Swiss Farrow-to-Finish Farms.

Authors:  Thomas Echtermann; Cedric Muentener; Xaver Sidler; Dolf Kuemmerlen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-12-15

5.  Antimicrobial Use in Animals in Timor-Leste Based on Veterinary Antimicrobial Imports between 2016 and 2019.

Authors:  Shawn Ting; Abrao Pereira; Amalia de Jesus Alves; Salvador Fernandes; Cristina da Costa Soares; Felix Joanico Soares; Onofre da Costa Henrique; Steven Davis; Jennifer Yan; Joshua R Francis; Tamsin S Barnes; Joanita Bendita da Costa Jong
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-12

6.  Genomic Diversity and Virulence Potential of ESBL- and AmpC-β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Strains From Healthy Food Animals Across Europe.

Authors:  Christa Ewers; Anno de Jong; Ellen Prenger-Berninghoff; Farid El Garch; Ursula Leidner; Sumeet K Tiwari; Torsten Semmler
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review.

Authors:  Angkana Lekagul; Viroj Tangcharoensathien; Shunmay Yeung
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-06

8.  How antibiotics are used in pig farming: a mixed-methods study of pig farmers, feed mills and veterinarians in Thailand.

Authors:  Angkana Lekagul; Viroj Tangcharoensathien; Anne Mills; Jonathan Rushton; Shunmay Yeung
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-28

9.  How Input Parameters and Calculation Rules Influence On-Farm Antimicrobial Use Indicators in Animals.

Authors:  Agnès Waret-Szkuta; Victor Coelho; Lucie Collineau; Anne Hémonic; Claire Buy; Maxime Treff; Didier Raboisson
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-12-04

10.  Does the Use of Different Indicators to Benchmark Antimicrobial Use Affect Farm Ranking?

Authors:  Lorcan O'Neill; Maria Rodrigues da Costa; Finola Leonard; James Gibbons; Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz; Gerard McCutcheon; Edgar García Manzanilla
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.