Angkana Lekagul1, Viroj Tangcharoensathien2, Shunmay Yeung3. 1. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; International Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand. Electronic address: angkana@ihpp.thaigov.net. 2. International Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand. 3. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Overuse of antimicrobials in both humans and animals is recognized as one of the main drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR); and the optimisation of their use has been advocated as a key strategy for dealing with AMR. The measurement of antimicrobial use is vital for the design, monitoring and evaluation of such strategies. This systematic review describes and compares methods and measurements used to quantify antimicrobial use in pigs in order to inform efforts to standardize measurement. METHODS: The peer-reviewed literature was systematically searched using four online databases: MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review included: articles published in English, involving pigs of any age and types of production, providing quantitative data on antimicrobial use, containing a clear description of the methodology, and having moderate to high rank in the quality assessment. RESULTS: Of 2,362 abstracts reviewed, a total of 25 studies were included based on the eligibility criteria. All studies were published between 2001 and 2017. Twenty of the studies were conducted in eight European countries. Twelve studies estimated antimicrobial use and eight studies were primarily methodological papers comparing different methods or variables, or developing new methods. The two main sources of antimicrobial use data were farm surveys and national sales data. A large variety of units of measurement was found. In this review, the ten measurements identified were categorized into four groups: 1) antimicrobials use measured by milligrams of active substance per animal weight; 2) antimicrobials use measured by daily dose per weight at treatment; 3) antimicrobial use measured by daily dose per treatment period; and 4) antimicrobials use measured by daily dose per period at risk of treatment. CONCLUSION: There is no global standardized measurement of antimicrobial use in pigs. Given the importance of monitoring the use antimicrobials, we recommend that at a minimum, all countries should develop macro-level monitoring using national sales data and report use by milligram of active ingredients per Population Correcting Unit. Monitoring in specific animal species requires the development of systems to capture prescription at national or farm level. Findings from monitoring antimicrobial use may help to guide effective interventions for optimising use of antimicrobials, as recommended by the WHO Global Action Plan on AMR.
BACKGROUND: Overuse of antimicrobials in both humans and animals is recognized as one of the main drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR); and the optimisation of their use has been advocated as a key strategy for dealing with AMR. The measurement of antimicrobial use is vital for the design, monitoring and evaluation of such strategies. This systematic review describes and compares methods and measurements used to quantify antimicrobial use in pigs in order to inform efforts to standardize measurement. METHODS: The peer-reviewed literature was systematically searched using four online databases: MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review included: articles published in English, involving pigs of any age and types of production, providing quantitative data on antimicrobial use, containing a clear description of the methodology, and having moderate to high rank in the quality assessment. RESULTS: Of 2,362 abstracts reviewed, a total of 25 studies were included based on the eligibility criteria. All studies were published between 2001 and 2017. Twenty of the studies were conducted in eight European countries. Twelve studies estimated antimicrobial use and eight studies were primarily methodological papers comparing different methods or variables, or developing new methods. The two main sources of antimicrobial use data were farm surveys and national sales data. A large variety of units of measurement was found. In this review, the ten measurements identified were categorized into four groups: 1) antimicrobials use measured by milligrams of active substance per animal weight; 2) antimicrobials use measured by daily dose per weight at treatment; 3) antimicrobial use measured by daily dose per treatment period; and 4) antimicrobials use measured by daily dose per period at risk of treatment. CONCLUSION: There is no global standardized measurement of antimicrobial use in pigs. Given the importance of monitoring the use antimicrobials, we recommend that at a minimum, all countries should develop macro-level monitoring using national sales data and report use by milligram of active ingredients per Population Correcting Unit. Monitoring in specific animal species requires the development of systems to capture prescription at national or farm level. Findings from monitoring antimicrobial use may help to guide effective interventions for optimising use of antimicrobials, as recommended by the WHO Global Action Plan on AMR.
Authors: Angelina L Bosman; Anne E Deckert; Carolee A Carson; Richard J Reid-Smith; Zvonimir Poljak; Scott A McEwen Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: Shawn Ting; Abrao Pereira; Amalia de Jesus Alves; Salvador Fernandes; Cristina da Costa Soares; Felix Joanico Soares; Onofre da Costa Henrique; Steven Davis; Jennifer Yan; Joshua R Francis; Tamsin S Barnes; Joanita Bendita da Costa Jong Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2021-04-12
Authors: Christa Ewers; Anno de Jong; Ellen Prenger-Berninghoff; Farid El Garch; Ursula Leidner; Sumeet K Tiwari; Torsten Semmler Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Agnès Waret-Szkuta; Victor Coelho; Lucie Collineau; Anne Hémonic; Claire Buy; Maxime Treff; Didier Raboisson Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2019-12-04
Authors: Lorcan O'Neill; Maria Rodrigues da Costa; Finola Leonard; James Gibbons; Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz; Gerard McCutcheon; Edgar García Manzanilla Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2020-10-13