Literature DB >> 27592024

Guidance on the Selection of Appropriate Indicators for Quantification of Antimicrobial Usage in Humans and Animals.

L Collineau1,2, C Belloc2, K D C Stärk1, A Hémonic3, M Postma4, J Dewulf4, C Chauvin5.   

Abstract

An increasing variety of indicators of antimicrobial usage has become available in human and veterinary medicine, with no consensus on the most appropriate indicators to be used. The objective of this review is therefore to provide guidance on the selection of indicators, intended for those aiming to quantify antimicrobial usage based on sales, deliveries or reimbursement data. Depending on the study objective, different requirements apply to antimicrobial usage quantification in terms of resolution, comprehensiveness, stability over time, ability to assess exposure and comparability. If the aim is to monitor antimicrobial usage trends, it is crucial to use a robust quantification system that allows stability over time in terms of required data and provided output; to compare usage between different species or countries, comparability must be ensured between the different populations. If data are used for benchmarking, the system comprehensiveness is particularly crucial, while data collected to study the association between usage and resistance should express the exposure level and duration as a measurement of the exerted selection pressure. Antimicrobial usage is generally described as the number of technical units consumed normalized by the population at risk of being treated in a defined period. The technical units vary from number of packages to number of individuals treated daily by adding different levels of complexity such as daily dose or weight at treatment. These technical units are then related to a description of the population at risk, based either on biomass or number of individuals. Conventions and assumptions are needed for all of these calculation steps. However, there is a clear lack of standardization, resulting in poor transparency and comparability. By combining study requirements with available approaches to quantify antimicrobial usage, we provide suggestions on the most appropriate indicators and data sources to be used for a given study objective.
© 2016 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotics; antimicrobial consumption; quantification; technical units

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27592024     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  48 in total

1.  Choosing which metrics to use when reporting antimicrobial use information to veterinarians in the Canadian swine industry.

Authors:  Angelina L Bosman; Anne E Deckert; Carolee A Carson; Richard J Reid-Smith; Zvonimir Poljak; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Analysis of antimicrobial sales data of the main distributor in Quebec from 2016 to 2019: An estimate of usage in dairy cattle, horses, and small animals.

Authors:  Jasmin Laroche; Cécile Ferrouillet; Luc DesCôteaux
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.075

3.  The association between measurements of antimicrobial use and resistance in the faeces microbiota of finisher batches.

Authors:  V D Andersen; L V DE Knegt; P Munk; M S Jensen; Y Agersø; F M Aarestrup; H Vigre
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Validation of the register-based lifetime antimicrobial usage measurement for finisher batches based on comparison with recorded antimicrobial usage at farm level.

Authors:  V D Andersen; P Munk; L V de Knegt; M S Jensen; F M Aarestrup; H Vigre
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Why Antibiotic Use Data in Animals Needs to Be Collected and How This Can Be Facilitated.

Authors:  Jorge Pinto Ferreira
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-12

6.  The impact of interventions to improve the quality of prescribing and use of antibiotics in primary care patients with respiratory tract infections: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Nahara Anani Martínez-González; Samuel Coenen; Andreas Plate; Annelies Colliers; Thomas Rosemann; Oliver Senn; Stefan Neuner-Jehle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Antimicrobial use surveillance in broiler chicken flocks in Canada, 2013-2015.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; David F Léger; Carolee A Carson; Sheryl P Gow; Angelina Bosman; Rebecca J Irwin; Richard J Reid-Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of Quantification Methods to Estimate Farm-Level Usage of Antimicrobials Other than in Medicated Feed in Dairy Farms from Québec, Canada.

Authors:  Hélène Lardé; David Francoz; Jean-Philippe Roy; Jonathan Massé; Marie Archambault; Marie-Ève Paradis; Simon Dufour
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-20

9.  Antimicrobial consumption on Austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records.

Authors:  Clair L Firth; Annemarie Käsbohrer; Corina Schleicher; Klemens Fuchs; Christa Egger-Danner; Martin Mayerhofer; Hermann Schobesberger; Josef Köfer; Walter Obritzhauser
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015.

Authors:  Eili Y Klein; Thomas P Van Boeckel; Elena M Martinez; Suraj Pant; Sumanth Gandra; Simon A Levin; Herman Goossens; Ramanan Laxminarayan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.