Literature DB >> 33957140

Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in use of endocrine-disrupting chemical-associated personal care product categories among pregnant women.

Emma V Preston1, Marissa Chan1, Katerina Nozhenko1, Andrea Bellavia1, Marissa C Grenon1, David E Cantonwine2, Thomas F McElrath2, Tamarra James-Todd3.   

Abstract

Personal care products (PCPs) are important and modifiable sources of exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Research is limited on how EDC-associated PCP use differs by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES), particularly during the sensitive period of pregnancy. We investigated differences in PCP use by race/ethnicity and SES among 497 participants in the LIFECODES pregnancy cohort (Boston, Massachusetts). Participants self-reported race/ethnicity, SES indicators (maternal education; insurance status), and recent PCP use via questionnaire at ≤4 prenatal visits. We evaluated trimester-specific differences in use of individual PCP categories by race/ethnicity and SES indicators. We used Poisson regression to estimate trimester-specific mean total product categories used by race/ethnicity and SES indicators. In the first trimester, compared to non-Hispanic White women, Hispanic women reported higher use of hair gel (45% vs. 28%), perfume (75% vs. 39%), and "other" hair products (37% vs. 19%). Compared to women with a college degree, women without a college degree reported higher use of perfume (79% vs. 41%) and bar soap (74% vs. 56%); patterns were similar for insurance status. The estimated mean total product categories used was significantly lower in Asian compared to non-Hispanic White women in all trimesters (e.g., Trimester 1: 4.8 vs. 6.7 categories; p<0.001). Patterns of PCP use differed by race/ethnicity and SES, with implications for potentially modifiable differential EDC exposure and associated pregnancy outcomes.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Personal care products; Pregnancy; Race/ethnicity; Socioeconomic status

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33957140      PMCID: PMC8886956          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   8.431


  60 in total

1.  Distribution and predictors of urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites and phenols among pregnant women in the Healthy Start Study.

Authors:  Kristen J Polinski; Dana Dabelea; Richard F Hamman; John L Adgate; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Anne P Starling
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  A survey of use of hormone/placenta-containing hair preparations by parents and/or children attending pediatric clinics.

Authors:  C M Tiwary
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Urinary triclosan concentrations during pregnancy and birth outcomes.

Authors:  Taylor M Etzel; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Aimin Chen; Bruce P Lanphear; David A Savitz; Kimberly Yolton; Joseph M Braun
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Effect of neighbourhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based study.

Authors:  Zhong-Cheng Luo; Russell Wilkins; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern.

Authors:  Ami R Zota; Bhavna Shamasunder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Racial Disparities in Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Psychosocial Stress.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Corette B Parker; Marian Willinger; Deborah A Wing; Robert M Silver; Ronald J Wapner; Hyagriv N Simhan; Samuel Parry; Brian M Mercer; David M Haas; Alan M Peaceman; Shannon Hunter; Pathik Wadhwa; Michal A Elovitz; Tatiana Foroud; George Saade; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Racial disparity in maternal phthalates exposure; Association with racial disparity in fetal growth and birth outcomes.

Authors:  Michael S Bloom; Abby G Wenzel; John W Brock; John R Kucklick; Rebecca J Wineland; Lori Cruze; Elizabeth R Unal; Recai M Yucel; Assem Jiyessova; Roger B Newman
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  A survey of phthalates and parabens in personal care products from the United States and its implications for human exposure.

Authors:  Ying Guo; Kurunthachalam Kannan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Association between insurance type and pregnancy outcomes in women diagnosed with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Authors:  Karen S Greiner; Rosa J Speranza; Monica Rincón; Sridivya S Beeraka; Richard M Burwick
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2018-09-26

10.  Acculturation and endocrine disrupting chemical-associated personal care product use among US-based foreign-born Chinese women of reproductive age.

Authors:  Veronica A Wang; MyDzung T Chu; Lucy Chie; Symielle A Gaston; Chandra L Jackson; Nicole Newendorp; Elanah Uretsky; Robin E Dodson; Gary Adamkiewicz; Tamarra James-Todd
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.563

View more
  1 in total

1.  Endocrine disrupting chemical-associated hair product use during pregnancy and gestational age at delivery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Emma V Preston; Victoria Fruh; Shruthi Mahalingaiah; Tamarra James-Todd; Marlee R Quinn; Michele R Hacker; Blair J Wylie; Karen O'Brien
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 5.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.