| Literature DB >> 33235331 |
Veronica A Wang1, MyDzung T Chu1, Lucy Chie2, Symielle A Gaston3, Chandra L Jackson3,4, Nicole Newendorp5, Elanah Uretsky6, Robin E Dodson7, Gary Adamkiewicz1, Tamarra James-Todd8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Personal care products (PCPs) are an important source of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) linked to adverse reproductive health outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Asian Americans; Asian Continental Ancestry Group; acculturation; cosmetics; endocrine disruptors; personal care products
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33235331 PMCID: PMC7954893 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-020-00279-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol ISSN: 1559-0631 Impact factor: 5.563
Summary of sociodemographic characteristics and acculturation measures overall and by latent class
| Total (n=227) | High PCP users (n=192) | Moderate PCP users (n=35) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32.7 (6.7) | 32.5 (6.6) | 34.1 (7.1) | |
| Median (IQR) | 24.0 (20.0–29.0) | 23.5 (20.0–29.0) | 25.8 (21.0–31.5) |
| Range | 5.0–44.2 | 5.0–44.2 | 15.0–42.0 |
| Median (IQR) | 7.0 (3.0–11.0) | 7.0 (3.8–11.0) | 4.0 (1.8–10.5) |
| Range | 0.2–34.0 | 0.2–34.0 | 0.3–26.0 |
| < High School | 50 (22.1) | 39 (20.5) | 11 (31.4) |
| High School | 83 (36.4) | 69 (36.3) | 13 (37.1) |
| > High School | 93 (41.0) | 81 (42.6) | 11 (31.4) |
| Don’t know | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Overall | 88 (38.8) | 81 (42.2) | 7 (20.0) |
| With friends | 55 (24.2) | 50 (26.0) | 5 (14.3) |
| At home | 20 (8.8) | 19 (9.9) | 1 (2.9) |
SD=standard deviation; IQR=interquartile range
Fig. 1:Black bars denote the probability of using each PCP type in the last 48 hours among high PCP users (left panel) and moderate PCP users (right panel). Abbreviations: P1, crème rinse/conditioner; P2: shampoo; P3: perfume/cologne; P4: bar soap/body wash; P5: liquid hand soap; P6: lotion/moisturizer; P7: colored cosmetics; P8: sunscreen; P9: nail polish
English language acculturation measures as predictors of high PCP user versus moderate PCP user class*.
| Speaks English (any versus none) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall OR (95% CI) | With friends OR (95% CI) | At home OR (95% CI) | |
| Model 1[ | 2.92 (1.28, 7.56) | 2.11 (0.84, 6.46) | 3.73 (0.74, 68.21) |
| Model 2[ | 2.61 (1.12, 6.84) | 1.83 (0.70, 5.71) | 3.39 (0.65, 62.27) |
| Model 3[ | 2.77 (1.10, 7.76) | 1.80 (0.66, 5.77) | 3.22 (0.60, 59.75) |
unadjusted
adjusted for age at US entry and site location
adjusted for age at US entry, site location, length of US residence, and educational attainment
High PCP users class included 192 women, and moderate PCP users class included 35 women based on the latent class analyses conducted.
Associations between English language acculturation measures and individual product type usage
| Speaks English (any versus none) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall OR (95% CI) | With friends OR (95% CI) | At home OR (95% CI) | |
| Crème rinse/conditioner | 1.43 (0.73, 2.84) | 1.32 (0.62, 2.79) | 0.84 (0.30, 2.35) |
| Shampoo | 1.92 (0.64, 5.75) | 1.21 (0.39, 3.78) | 0.92 (0.18, 4.65) |
| Perfume/cologne | 1.96 (0.93, 4.09) | 2.79 (1.31, 5.97) | 3.78 (1.36, 10.53) |
| Bar soap/body wash | 1.78 (0.59, 5.43) | 1.99 (0.53, 7.42) | NE |
| Liquid hand soap | 2.90 (1.00, 8.46) | 2.75 (0.70, 10.72) | NE |
| Lotion/moisturizer | 1.21 (0.59, 2.48) | 0.69 (0.33, 1.46) | 0.66 (0.23, 1.90) |
| Colored cosmetics | 1.69 (0.83, 3.43) | 1.07 (0.51, 2.27) | 0.99 (0.33, 2.93) |
| Sunscreen | 1.57 (0.83, 2.97) | 1.07 (0.55, 2.09) | 1.45 (0.54, 3.87) |
| Nail polish | 2.06 (0.79, 5.40) | 3.61 (1.39, 9.33) | 2.71 (0.82, 8.98) |
All models adjusted for age at US entry, site location, length of US residence, and educational attainment.
NE: non-estimable – model could not converge because usage groups were unbalance