Literature DB >> 28822238

The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern.

Ami R Zota1, Bhavna Shamasunder2.   

Abstract

The obstetrics-gynecology community has issued a call to action to prevent toxic environmental chemical exposures and their threats to healthy human reproduction. Recent committee opinions recognize that vulnerable and underserved women may be impacted disproportionately by environmental chemical exposures and recommend that reproductive health professionals champion policies that secure environmental justice. Beauty product use is an understudied source of environmental chemical exposures. Beauty products can include reproductive and developmental toxicants such as phthalates and heavy metals; however, disclosure requirements are limited and inconsistent. Compared with white women, women of color have higher levels of beauty product-related environmental chemicals in their bodies, independent of socioeconomic status. Even small exposures to toxic chemicals during critical periods of development (such as pregnancy) can trigger adverse health consequences (such as impacts on fertility and pregnancy, neurodevelopment, and cancer). In this commentary, we seek to highlight the connections between environmental justice and beauty product-related chemical exposures. We describe racial/ethnic differences in beauty product use (such as skin lighteners, hair straighteners, and feminine hygiene products) and the potential chemical exposures and health risks that are associated with these products. We also discuss how targeted advertising can take advantage of mainstream beauty norms to influence the use of these products. Reproductive health professionals can use this information to advance environmental justice by being prepared to counsel patients who have questions about toxic environmental exposures from beauty care products and other sources. Researchers and healthcare providers can also promote health-protective policies such as improved ingredient testing and disclosure for the beauty product industry. Future clinical and public health research should consider beauty product use as a factor that may shape health inequities in women's reproductive health across the life course.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cosmetics; endocrine-disrupting chemicals; environmental justice; health disparity; toxic environmental chemicals

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28822238      PMCID: PMC5614862          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  53 in total

Review 1.  Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities.

Authors:  Robert J Brulle; David N Pellow
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Characterizing workplace exposures in Vietnamese women working in California nail salons.

Authors:  Thu Quach; Robert Gunier; Alisha Tran; Julie Von Behren; Phuong-An Doan-Billings; Kim-Dung Nguyen; Linda Okahara; Benjamin Yee-Bun Lui; Mychi Nguyen; Jessica Huynh; Peggy Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Understanding the cumulative impacts of inequalities in environmental health: implications for policy.

Authors:  Rachel Morello-Frosch; Miriam Zuk; Michael Jerrett; Bhavna Shamasunder; Amy D Kyle
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.

Authors:  Zinzi D Bailey; Nancy Krieger; Madina Agénor; Jasmine Graves; Natalia Linos; Mary T Bassett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The globalization of whitening: prevalence of skin lighteners (or bleachers) use and its social correlates among university students in 26 countries.

Authors:  Karl Peltzer; Supa Pengpid; Caryl James
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.736

6.  Personal care products that contain estrogens or xenoestrogens may increase breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Maryann Donovan; Chandra M Tiwary; Deborah Axelrod; Annie J Sasco; Lovell Jones; Richard Hajek; Erin Sauber; Jean Kuo; Devra L Davis
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 1.538

7.  Association between Body Powder Use and Ovarian Cancer: The African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES).

Authors:  Joellen M Schildkraut; Sarah E Abbott; Anthony J Alberg; Elisa V Bandera; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Melissa L Bondy; Michele L Cote; Ellen Funkhouser; Lauren C Peres; Edward S Peters; Ann G Schwartz; Paul Terry; Sydnee Crankshaw; Fabian Camacho; Frances Wang; Patricia G Moorman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Prenatal Stress as a Modifier of Associations between Phthalate Exposure and Reproductive Development: results from a Multicentre Pregnancy Cohort Study.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Lauren E Parlett; Sheela Sathyanarayana; J Bruce Redmon; Ruby H N Nguyen; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Genital powder use and risk of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 8,525 cases and 9,859 controls.

Authors:  Kathryn L Terry; Stalo Karageorgi; Yurii B Shvetsov; Melissa A Merritt; Galina Lurie; Pamela J Thompson; Michael E Carney; Rachel Palmieri Weber; Lucy Akushevich; Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic; Kara Cushing-Haugen; Weiva Sieh; Kirsten Moysich; Jennifer A Doherty; Christina M Nagle; Andrew Berchuck; Celeste L Pearce; Malcolm Pike; Roberta B Ness; Penelope M Webb; Mary Anne Rossing; Joellen Schildkraut; Harvey Risch; Marc T Goodman
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2013-06-12

10.  Prenatal phthalate exposure is associated with childhood behavior and executive functioning.

Authors:  Stephanie M Engel; Amir Miodovnik; Richard L Canfield; Chenbo Zhu; Manori J Silva; Antonia M Calafat; Mary S Wolff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  54 in total

1.  Association of self-reported personal care product use with blood glucose levels measured during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Andrea Bellavia; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Jennifer B Ford; Myra Keller; John Petrozza; Paige L Williams; Russ Hauser; Tamarra James-Todd
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  Social Determinants of Placental Health and Future Disease Risks for Babies.

Authors:  Kent L Thornburg; Janne Boone-Heinonen; Amy M Valent
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Phthalates exposure and uterine fibroid burden among women undergoing surgical treatment for fibroids: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ami R Zota; Ruth J Geller; Antonia M Calafat; Cherie Q Marfori; Andrea A Baccarelli; Gaby N Moawad
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Synthetic Chemicals and Cardiometabolic Health Across the Life Course Among Vulnerable Populations: a Review of the Literature from 2018 to 2019.

Authors:  Symielle A Gaston; Linda S Birnbaum; Chandra L Jackson
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2020-03

5.  Skin lighteners and hair relaxers as risk factors for breast cancer: results from the Ghana breast health study.

Authors:  Louise A Brinton; Jonine D Figueroa; Daniel Ansong; Kofi M Nyarko; Seth Wiafe; Joel Yarney; Richard Biritwum; Michelle Brotzman; Jake E Thistle; Ernest Adjei; Francis Aitpillah; Florence Dedey; Lawrence Edusei; Nicholas Titiloye; Baffour Awuah; Joe Nat Clegg-Lamptey; Beatrice Wiafe-Addai; Verna Vanderpuye
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Racial/ethnic disparities in disease burden and costs related to exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the United States: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Teresa M Attina; Julia Malits; Mrudula Naidu; Leonardo Trasande
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 7.  Joint Impact of Synthetic Chemical and Non-chemical Stressors on Children's Health.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Amy M Padula
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2019-12

8.  Integrating Intersectionality Into the Exposome Paradigm: A Novel Approach to Racial Inequities in Uterine Fibroids.

Authors:  Ami R Zota; Brianna N VanNoy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  The role of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in uterine fibroid pathogenesis.

Authors:  Maria Victoria Bariani; Roshni Rangaswamy; Hiba Siblini; Qiwei Yang; Ayman Al-Hendy; Ami R Zota
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Maternal use of personal care products during pregnancy and risk of testicular germ cell tumors in sons.

Authors:  Armen A Ghazarian; Britton Trabert; Kim Robien; Barry I Graubard; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 6.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.