Literature DB >> 33951211

Preliminary report on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike mutation T478K.

Simone Di Giacomo1, Daniele Mercatelli1, Amir Rakhimov1, Federico M Giorgi1.   

Abstract

Several severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have emerged, posing a renewed threat to coronavirus disease 2019 containment and to vaccine and drug efficacy. In this study, we analyzed more than 1,000,000 SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences deposited up to April 27, 2021, on the GISAID public repository, and identified a novel T478K mutation located on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. The mutation is structurally located in the region of interaction with human receptor ACE2 and was detected in 11,435 distinct cases. We show that T478K has appeared and risen in frequency since January 2021, predominantly in Mexico and the United States, but we could also detect it in several European countries.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; S:T478K; SARS-CoV-2; Spike; Spike:T478K; T478K; genomic surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33951211      PMCID: PMC8242375          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   20.693


INTRODUCTION

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), the etiological cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is responsible for the most severe pandemic outbreak of the current century. Naturally, it is the object of unprecedented scientific scrutiny, with more than one million SARS‐CoV‐2 genomic sequences having been generated and publicly shared since December 2019. This avalanche of data was made possible, thanks to the efforts of thousands of contributing laboratories across the World, and collected by the GISAID initiative database. This currently allows to run nearly real‐time operations of genomic surveillance, by scrutinizing the evolution of the virus temporally and geographically. In the first 17 months since the appearance of SARS‐CoV‐2, genomic surveillance has proven itself fundamental in tracking viral outbreaks and in identifying potential new variants of clinical concern. One of these is the variant B.1.1.7, characterized by 18 mutations over the reference genomic sequence (NCBI entry NC_045512.2, most notably a mutation A23063T, causing an aminoacidic change N501Y in the viral Spike protein interaction domain with human receptor angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The interaction with ACE2, a surface protein expressed in human respiratory epithelial cells, is one of the key mechanisms for viral entry in the host, and it is a molecular mechanism directly connected with host specificity, early transmissibility, and higher viral infectivity. N501Y is only one of the 9 Spike mutations of variant B.1.1.7, also characterized by mutations in polyprotein open reading frame (ORF1a), proteins ORF8, and nucleocapsid (N). Another mutation in the Spike protein, D614G, was prevalent in early 2020 and is currently present in more than 90% of all circulating SARS‐CoV‐2s; this mutation is not located in the interaction domain with ACE2, but it has been associated with increased entry efficiency into human host cells. The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention defined “variants of concern” all those mutations and lineages, which have been associated with an increase in transmissibility and virulence, a decrease in the effectiveness of social and public health measures targeting the virus, and in general all mutations potentially affecting COVID‐19 epidemiology. Virtually all variants of concern contain mutations in the SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike protein, such as variant B.1.351 (Spike mutations K417N, E484K, N501Y, D614G, and A701V) and variants B.1.427/B.1.429 (Spike mutations S13I, W152C, L452R, and D614G), and many of these reside on the receptor‐binding domain (RBD), a region located between residues 350–550 of Spike and directly binding to the human ACE2.6, 12 Recombinant vaccines comprising the Spike RBD induced potent antibody response in immunized animal models, such as mice, rabbits, and primates. On the other hand, mutations in the RBD can improve viral affinity to ACE2 and the evasion from neutralization antibodies.8, 14, 15, 16 A recently published clinical study has shown also a decreased vaccine efficacy against the lineage B.1.351 (carrying Spike mutations E484K and N501Y), testifying the need to track and monitor all SARS‐CoV‐2 mutations, with a particular accent on those affecting the Spike RBD. In this short communication, we will show a report on a novel SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike mutation, T478K, which is also located at the interface of the Spike/ACE2 interaction, and it is worryingly rising in prevalence among SARS‐CoV‐2 sequences collected since the beginning of 2021.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We downloaded all publicly available SARS‐CoV‐2 genomic sequences from the GISAID database on April 27, 2021. This yielded 1,180,571 samples, annotated with features, such as collection date, region of origin, age, and sex of the infected patient. Only viruses collected from human hosts were kept for further processing, discarding, for example, environmental samples or viruses obtained from other mammals. We compared all these sequences with the SARS‐CoV‐2 Wuhan genome NC_045512.2, using a gene annotation file in GFF3 format available as Supplementary File 1. This provided 27,388,937 mutations when compared with the reference. These nucleotide mutations were then converted in corresponding cumulative effects on protein sequence using the Coronapp pipeline. The 3D rendering of the location of S:T478K in the SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike/Human ACE2 complex was based on the crystal structure from, deposited in the Protein Data Bank entry 6VW1. Comparison between wild‐type and mutant Spike was performed using the Pymol suite with the adaptive Poisson–Boltzmann Solver plugin. All statistical analysis, algorithms, and plotting were implemented with the R software.

RESULTS

In total, we could detect the Spike:T478K (S:T478K) mutation in 11,435 distinct patients as of April 27, 2021, more than twice the number observed one month before, on March 26, 2021 (4214). The majority of these mutations (20,205 samples, Figure 1A and Figure S1) are associated with PANGOLIN lineage B.1.1.519; S:T478K is present in 97.0% of B.1.1.519 cases. The remaining S:T478K events are distributed in small numbers (N < 250) in other lineages phylogenetically not derived from B.1.1.519, supporting the hypothesis that this mutation has arisen more than once in distinct events. S:T478K is also present in 68 out of 85 (80%) reported samples from the B.1.214.3; however, the low total number of cases for this lineage do not make it a variant of concern yet.
Figure 1

(A) Prevalence of Spike mutation T478K in PANGO lineages. The top 10 lineages are reported, sorted by number of S:T478K samples over a total number of lineage samples. The discrete number of S:T478K is reported on top of each bar. Most S:T478K‐carrying samples are classified in the B.1.1.519 lineage. (B) Frequency of sequenced severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) genomes carrying the S:T478K mutation, divided into 10 years age ranges. The total number of S:T478K patients for the specified age range is reported on top of the bars. (C) Pie chart showing the distribution of S:T478K by patient sex. (D) Number of S:T478K samples over total samples sequenced from each country. The 10 countries with higher frequency (in percentage) are shown. Discrete numbers of S:T478K are reported on top of each bar. (E) Geographic global projection of S:T478K cases detected in each country. The color scale indicates the number of SARS‐CoV‐2 genomes carrying the S:T478K mutation, in logarithm‐10 scale

(A) Prevalence of Spike mutation T478K in PANGO lineages. The top 10 lineages are reported, sorted by number of S:T478K samples over a total number of lineage samples. The discrete number of S:T478K is reported on top of each bar. Most S:T478K‐carrying samples are classified in the B.1.1.519 lineage. (B) Frequency of sequenced severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) genomes carrying the S:T478K mutation, divided into 10 years age ranges. The total number of S:T478K patients for the specified age range is reported on top of the bars. (C) Pie chart showing the distribution of S:T478K by patient sex. (D) Number of S:T478K samples over total samples sequenced from each country. The 10 countries with higher frequency (in percentage) are shown. Discrete numbers of S:T478K are reported on top of each bar. (E) Geographic global projection of S:T478K cases detected in each country. The color scale indicates the number of SARS‐CoV‐2 genomes carrying the S:T478K mutation, in logarithm‐10 scale S:T478K does not seem to be significantly associated with patient age (one‐way analysis of variance test p > .1, Figure 1B and Figure S2), nor with patient sex (Figure 1C). The geographic distribution of S:T478K (Figure 1D and Figure S3) shows a noticeable prevalence in Mexico, where it constitutes 52.8% (3202 distinct cases) of all sequenced SARS‐CoV‐2 genomes. We could detect S:T478K mutations in 7133 samples from the United States of America, totaling 2.7% of all genomes generated in the country. The S:T478K is therefore primarily present in North America, constituting more than 50% of all the sequences generated in Mexico (Figure 1D and Figure S4). S:t478k has been detected also in European countries, such as Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland (Figure 1E and Table S1). One of the reasons of concern about S:T478K is that it is rapidly growing over time, both in the number of detected samples (Figure 2A) and in prevalence, calculated as the number of cases over the total number of sequenced genomes (Figure 2B). We detected this growth starting at the beginning of 2021, and S:T478K is, at the time of writing (April 27, 2021) characterizing more than 2.0% of all sequenced SARS‐CoV‐2. As a comparison, we show the growth observed for Spike mutations S:N501Y, which rose in November 2020 (Figure 2C), and S:D614G, which exponentially grew in frequency starting from February 2020 (Figure 2D).
Figure 2

(A) Number of sequenced SARS‐CoV‐2 genomes carrying S:T478K mutation over time, measured weekly. (B) Prevalence over time of S:T478K in the SARS‐CoV‐2 population, measured as the number of S:T478K genomes over the total number of sequenced genomes. (C) Prevalence over time of S:N501Y in the SARS‐CoV‐2 population. (D) Prevalence over time of S:D614G in the SARS‐CoV‐2 population. SATRS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

(A) Number of sequenced SARS‐CoV‐2 genomes carrying S:T478K mutation over time, measured weekly. (B) Prevalence over time of S:T478K in the SARS‐CoV‐2 population, measured as the number of S:T478K genomes over the total number of sequenced genomes. (C) Prevalence over time of S:N501Y in the SARS‐CoV‐2 population. (D) Prevalence over time of S:D614G in the SARS‐CoV‐2 population. SATRS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 The location of S:T478K is within the interaction domain with the human receptor ACE2, roughly encompassing amino acids 350 to 550 of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike protein. In particular, the position of S:T478K is on the interface with ACE2, as shown by crystal structures of the complex (Figure 3A). The amino acid change from the polar but uncharged threonine (T) to a basic, charged lysine (K) is predicted to increase the electrostatic potential of Spike to a more positive surface, in a region directly contacting ACE2 (Figure 3B). Also, the larger side chain of lysine is predicted to increase the steric hindrance of the mutant, possibly further affecting the Spike/ACE2 interaction (Figure 3C).
Figure 3

(A) 3D representation of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike/Human ACE2 interacting complex, derived from the crystal structure from. (B) Representation of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike electrostatic potential calculated with the Adaptive Poisson–Boltzmann Solver (APBS) program implemented in PyMOL. Molecular surface was colored according to the molecular electrostatic potential (ranging from −2.0 [red] to 2.0 [blue]) in T478 (reference, above) and in K478 (more recent mutation, below). (C) 3D detail of structural superposition of WT SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD and S:T478K. T478 side chains are colored in cyan, while K478 side chains are colored in red. ACE2, angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2; RBD, receptor‐binding domain; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; WT, wild‐type

(A) 3D representation of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike/Human ACE2 interacting complex, derived from the crystal structure from. (B) Representation of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike electrostatic potential calculated with the Adaptive Poisson–Boltzmann Solver (APBS) program implemented in PyMOL. Molecular surface was colored according to the molecular electrostatic potential (ranging from −2.0 [red] to 2.0 [blue]) in T478 (reference, above) and in K478 (more recent mutation, below). (C) 3D detail of structural superposition of WT SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD and S:T478K. T478 side chains are colored in cyan, while K478 side chains are colored in red. ACE2, angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2; RBD, receptor‐binding domain; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; WT, wild‐type S:T478K is frequently co‐occurring with three other Spike mutations located outside the canonical ACE2 interaction region. One is D614G (99.83% co‐occurrence), one of the founding events of SARS‐CoV‐2 lineage B, currently the most diffused Worldwide (Table 1). The other two are P681H and T732A, with 93.8% and 88.7% co‐occurrence with S:T478K, respectively (Table 1). We could detect S:T478K in copresence with other Spike mutations as well, but currently all at much lower frequencies (<4%). The Spike S:T478K mutation is frequently co‐existing also with mutations in other proteins, such as the diffused two‐aa Nucleocapsid mutation N:RG203KR, and mutations in nonstructural proteins (NSPs) derived from the polyprotein encoded ORF1, which include for example the viral RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase NSP12 (Table 2).
Table 1

Ten SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike mutations most frequently co‐occurring with S:T478K

Number of cases Percentage
S:D614G1142899.83
S:P681H1073993.81
S:T732A1015788.73
S:L5F4393.84
S:L452R2412.11
S:P681R2241.96
S:D950N2221.94
S:T19R2151.88
S:E1561741.52
S:E154A1491.3

Note: We report the number of genomes where both mutations are present, and the percentage over the total number of samples where S:T478K is reported.

Abbreviation: SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Table 2

Ten SARS‐CoV‐2 non‐Spike mutations most frequently co‐occurring with S:T478K

Number of cases Percentage
NSP12b:P314L1131098.8
NSP4:T492I1071693.61
NSP6:I49V1069293.4
NSP3:P141S1068793.36
N:RG203KR1062292.79
NSP9:T35I1015088.67
ORF8:L4P161714.13
N:Q418H10529.19
NSP2:T44I10449.12
ORF8:A65V6165.38

Note: We report the number of genomes where both mutations are present, and the percentage over the total number of samples where S:7478 K is reported.

Abbreviation: N, nucleocapsid protein; NSP, nonstructural protein; ORF, open reading frame; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Ten SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike mutations most frequently co‐occurring with S:T478K Note: We report the number of genomes where both mutations are present, and the percentage over the total number of samples where S:T478K is reported. Abbreviation: SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Ten SARS‐CoV‐2 non‐Spike mutations most frequently co‐occurring with S:T478K Note: We report the number of genomes where both mutations are present, and the percentage over the total number of samples where S:7478 K is reported. Abbreviation: N, nucleocapsid protein; NSP, nonstructural protein; ORF, open reading frame; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

DISCUSSION

In this short communication, we report the distribution of the Spike mutation S:T478K and its recent growth in prevalence in the SARS‐CoV‐2 population. While there is currently no report of association of this variant with clinical features, S:T478K's rapid growth may indicate an increased adaption of SARS‐CoV‐2 variants carrying it, particularly lineage B.1.1.519. The distribution of this mutation, which emerged from the B.1 lineage carrying S:D614G, but is independent of the S:N501Y mutation, is higher in North America, but we could detect it also in several European countries. T478K has been detected in other phylogenetically non‐derived lineages from B.1.1.519, supporting the hypothesis that this mutation arose more than once in distinct events. Since the highest abundance of this mutation seems to be in Mexico and USA, this may allow to hypothesize a founder effect in which a chance founder event was followed by natural selection progression, since the frequency of the mutation has, slowly but steadily, increased in the first months of 2021. The location of S:T478K in the interaction complex with human ACE2 may affect the affinity with human cells and therefore influence viral infectivity. An in silico molecular dynamics study on the protein structure of Spike has predicted that the T478K mutation, substituting a non‐charged amino acid (Threonine) with a positive one (Lysine) may significantly alter the electrostatic surface of the protein (Figure 3), and therefore the interaction with ACE2, drugs, or antibodies, and that the effect can be increased if combined by other co‐occurring Spike mutations (see Table 1). Another experiment showed that T478K and T478R mutants were enriched when SARS‐CoV‐2 viral cultures were tested against weak neutralizing antibodies, highlighting, at least in vitro, a possible genetic route the virus can follow to escape immune recognition. Everything considered, we believe that the continued genetical and clinical monitoring of S:T478K and other Spike mutations are of paramount importance to better understand COVID‐19 and be able to better counteract its future developments.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Simone Di Giacomo and Federico M. Giorgi contributed to conceptualization. Federico M. Giorgi contributed to funding acquisition and writing—original draft preparation. Daniele Mercatelli and Simone Di Giacomo contributed to writing—review and editing. Amir Rakhimov and Federico M. Giorgi contributed to Methodology. Daniele Mercatelli, Simone Di Giacomo, and Federico M. Giorgi contributed to validation. Amir Rakhimov and Federico M. Giorgi provided software. All authors contributed to the study and approved the final version of the manuscript. Supporting information. Click here for additional data file. Supporting information. Click here for additional data file. Supporting information. Click here for additional data file. Supporting information. Click here for additional data file. Supporting information. Click here for additional data file. Supporting information. Click here for additional data file. Supporting information. Click here for additional data file.
  24 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  PyMOL and Inkscape Bridge the Data and the Data Visualization.

Authors:  Shuguang Yuan; H C Stephen Chan; Slawomir Filipek; Horst Vogel
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jurrus; Dave Engel; Keith Star; Kyle Monson; Juan Brandi; Lisa E Felberg; David H Brookes; Leighton Wilson; Jiahui Chen; Karina Liles; Minju Chun; Peter Li; David W Gohara; Todd Dolinsky; Robert Konecny; David R Koes; Jens Erik Nielsen; Teresa Head-Gordon; Weihua Geng; Robert Krasny; Guo-Wei Wei; Michael J Holst; J Andrew McCammon; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  SARS-CoV-2 immune evasion by the B.1.427/B.1.429 variant of concern.

Authors:  Matthew McCallum; Jessica Bassi; Anna De Marco; Alex Chen; Alexandra C Walls; Julia Di Iulio; M Alejandra Tortorici; Mary-Jane Navarro; Chiara Silacci-Fregni; Christian Saliba; Kaitlin R Sprouse; Maria Agostini; Dora Pinto; Katja Culap; Siro Bianchi; Stefano Jaconi; Elisabetta Cameroni; John E Bowen; Sasha W Tilles; Matteo Samuele Pizzuto; Sonja Bernasconi Guastalla; Giovanni Bona; Alessandra Franzetti Pellanda; Christian Garzoni; Wesley C Van Voorhis; Laura E Rosen; Gyorgy Snell; Amalio Telenti; Herbert W Virgin; Luca Piccoli; Davide Corti; David Veesler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 spike 69/70 deletion, E484K and N501Y variants by BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited sera.

Authors:  Xuping Xie; Yang Liu; Jianying Liu; Xianwen Zhang; Jing Zou; Camila R Fontes-Garfias; Hongjie Xia; Kena A Swanson; Mark Cutler; David Cooper; Vineet D Menachery; Scott C Weaver; Philip R Dormitzer; Pei-Yong Shi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Structural genetics of circulating variants affecting the SARS-CoV-2 spike/human ACE2 complex.

Authors:  Francesco Ortuso; Daniele Mercatelli; Pietro Hiram Guzzi; Federico Manuel Giorgi
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 5.235

7.  E484K mutation in SARS-CoV-2 RBD enhances binding affinity with hACE2 but reduces interactions with neutralizing antibodies and nanobodies: Binding free energy calculation studies.

Authors:  Wei Bu Wang; Yu Liang; Yu Qin Jin; Jing Zhang; Ji Guo Su; Qi Ming Li
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.518

8.  Affinity maturation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies confers potency, breadth, and resilience to viral escape mutations.

Authors:  Frauke Muecksch; Yiska Weisblum; Christopher O Barnes; Fabian Schmidt; Dennis Schaefer-Babajew; Zijun Wang; Julio C C Lorenzi; Andrew I Flyak; Andrew T DeLaitsch; Kathryn E Huey-Tubman; Shurong Hou; Celia A Schiffer; Christian Gaebler; Justin Da Silva; Daniel Poston; Shlomo Finkin; Alice Cho; Melissa Cipolla; Thiago Y Oliveira; Katrina G Millard; Victor Ramos; Anna Gazumyan; Magdalena Rutkowska; Marina Caskey; Michel C Nussenzweig; Pamela J Bjorkman; Theodora Hatziioannou; Paul D Bieniasz
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 31.745

9.  Coronapp: A web application to annotate and monitor SARS-CoV-2 mutations.

Authors:  Daniele Mercatelli; Luca Triboli; Eleonora Fornasari; Forest Ray; Federico M Giorgi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 20.693

View more
  46 in total

1.  Phylogenomics and population genomics of SARS-CoV-2 in Mexico during the pre-vaccination stage reveals variants of interest B.1.1.28.4 and B.1.1.222 or B.1.1.519 and the nucleocapsid mutation S194L associated with symptoms.

Authors:  Francisco Barona-Gómez; Luis Delaye; Erik Díaz-Valenzuela; Fabien Plisson; Arely Cruz-Pérez; Mauricio Díaz-Sánchez; Christian A García-Sepúlveda; Alejandro Sanchez-Flores; Rafael Pérez-Abreu; Francisco J Valencia-Valdespino; Natali Vega-Magaña; José Francisco Muñoz-Valle; Octavio Patricio García-González; Sofía Bernal-Silva; Andreu Comas-García; Angélica Cibrián-Jaramillo
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2021-11

2.  Clinical features of children with coronavirus disease 2019 caused by Delta variant infection.

Authors:  Jun-Feng Sheng; Lan Shao; Yu-Lin Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 3.  Structural and functional insights into the spike protein mutations of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Authors:  Deepali Gupta; Priyanka Sharma; Mandeep Singh; Mukesh Kumar; A S Ethayathulla; Punit Kaur
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Vaccines efficacy to SARS-CoV-2 variants require holistic knowledge of viral immunology and protein biochemistry.

Authors:  Sachin Kumar
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.526

5.  Neutralizing antibody activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants in gestational age-matched mother-infant dyads after infection or vaccination.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsui; Lin Li; Mary Prahl; Arianna G Cassidy; Nida Ozarslan; Yarden Golan; Veronica J Gonzalez; Christine Y Lin; Unurzul Jigmeddagva; Megan A Chidboy; Mauricio Montano; Taha Y Taha; Mir M Khalid; Bharath Sreekumar; Jennifer M Hayashi; Pei-Yi Chen; G Renuka Kumar; Lakshmi Warrier; Alan Hb Wu; Dongli Song; Priya Jegatheesan; Daljeet S Rai; Balaji Govindaswami; Jordan Needens; Monica Rincon; Leslie Myatt; Ifeyinwa V Asiodu; Valerie J Flaherman; Yalda Afshar; Vanessa L Jacoby; Amy P Murtha; Joshua F Robinson; Melanie Ott; Warner C Greene; Stephanie L Gaw
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-06-22

6.  Effects of Spike Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern on Human or Animal ACE2-Mediated Virus Entry and Neutralization.

Authors:  Yunjeong Kim; Natasha N Gaudreault; David A Meekins; Krishani D Perera; Dashzeveg Bold; Jessie D Trujillo; Igor Morozov; Chester D McDowell; Kyeong-Ok Chang; Juergen A Richt
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-31

7.  Increased Receptor Affinity and Reduced Recognition by Specific Antibodies Contribute to Immune Escape of SARS-CoV-2 Variant Omicron.

Authors:  Anne-Cathrine S Vogt; Gilles Augusto; Byron Martina; Xinyue Chang; Gheyath Nasrallah; Daniel E Speiser; Monique Vogel; Martin F Bachmann; Mona O Mohsen
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-09

8.  Preliminary report on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike mutation T478K.

Authors:  Simone Di Giacomo; Daniele Mercatelli; Amir Rakhimov; Federico M Giorgi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 20.693

9.  Nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 is a potential target for developing new generation of vaccine.

Authors:  Weixu Feng; Yunru Xiang; Lianpeng Wu; Zhuo Chen; Qingfeng Li; Jun Chen; Yanru Guo; Dandan Xia; Na Chen; Lifang Zhang; Shanli Zhu; Kong-Nan Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.124

10.  The Delta SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern Induces Distinct Pathogenic Patterns of Respiratory Disease in K18-hACE2 Transgenic Mice Compared to the Ancestral Strain from Wuhan.

Authors:  Ali Zaid; Adam Taylor; Suresh Mahalingam; Xiang Liu; Helen Mostafavi; Wern Hann Ng; Joseph R Freitas; Nicholas J C King
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 7.786

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.