Literature DB >> 9514016

Cancellation model of pitch perception.

A de Cheveigné1.   

Abstract

A model of pitch perception is presented involving an array of delay lines and inhibitory gating neurons. In response to a periodic sound, a minimum appears in the pattern of outputs of the inhibitory neurons at a lag equal to the period of the sound. The position of this minimum is the cue to pitch. The model is similar to the autocorrelation model of pitch, multiplication being replaced by an operation similar to subtraction, and maxima by minima. The two models account for a wide class of pitch phenomena in very much the same way. The principal goal of this paper is to demonstrate this fact. Several features of the cancellation model may be to its advantage: it is closely related to the operation of harmonic cancellation that can account for segregation of concurrent harmonic stimuli, it can be generalized to explain the perception of multiple pitches, and it shows a greater degree of sensitivity to phase than autocorrelation, which may allow it to explain certain phenomena that autocorrelation cannot account for.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9514016     DOI: 10.1121/1.423232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Joshua G W Bernstein; Hector Penagos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  An autocorrelation model with place dependence to account for the effect of harmonic number on fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization.

Authors:  Anna Dreyer; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Inhibition in the auditory brainstem enhances signal representation and regulates gain in complex acoustic environments.

Authors:  Christian Keine; Rudolf Rübsamen; Bernhard Englitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Pitch of complex tones: rate-place and interspike interval representations in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Processing pitch in a nonhuman mammal (Chinchilla laniger).

Authors:  William P Shofner; Megan Chaney
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  The role of harmonic resolvability in pitch perception in a vocal nonhuman primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Xindong Song; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Simultaneous consonance in music perception and composition.

Authors:  Peter M C Harrison; Marcus T Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.